Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
How do these babbies deal with something like Breaking Bad or even, to go back a bit, Six Feet Under, or other shows where all the characters are at best deeply flawed and at worst, outright monsters? Does the idea of character development even exist to these people? If your character is perfect from the start, where the fuck do you go from there?

Forget Breaking Bad. I don't even know how these morons process Star Wars or Harry Potter or the rest of the shit they claim they like. Because even in those things where the heroes are heroic bad things still happen to the good guys, which usually makes them all freak the fuck out. It seems like all these people want is a TV show where every episode is just 45 minutes of a small, cute, tuff brown gurl smashing her way through hordes of faceless bad guys without any kind of humanity or tension. Then at the end of the season she kisses the other small, cute, tuff brown gurl.
 
Even non-SJW vidya and cartoon spergs show signs of occasionally watching something that isn't Mario or anime or whatever. Why with SJWs is it always not just children's media, but the most infantile children's media imaginable? Meanwhile they attribute all kinds of depth to it that just isn't there, while completely ignoring any media that actually does have depth.

Children's media has the ability to indoctrinate people when they're young, whereas more adult-themed shows are for people who are capable of making their own decisions, and thus don't need to handhold their audience as much (not to say it doesn't happen).
 
Bob has his Detroit review up:
* Complains some more about "Tacky both sides-ism", and how the film manages to avoid it, because how dare people and ideas be flawed.
* He complains about the film not being "insightful" enough for his tastes and pandering to whitey. Because he's an expert on this apparently.
* Final score: 2 1/2 stars.

 
Bob's actually justified in writing someone off. Cue the flying pigs.
TALKING.JPG

TALKING0.JPG


Look at those major cosmopolitan havens like Detroit or the South Side of Chicago, they're the future.
BestPlaces.JPG


I can, because I'm not a sociopath who get triggered by op-eds.
BlazingHatred.JPG
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Flexo and Mola Ram
Off topic, but that was the treaty that kept the Protestant and Catholic member states of the Holy Roman Empire from killing each other, right?

Or... wait. No. I mean, yes. It did that, but it effectively dissolved the Empire.

Yep and pretty much established the modern concept of nations as we know it today. Before this borders of a nation were more like... suggestions. That was the start of codifying them.

So one could say back in the 1640s nations were the "superior future."

Bob has another rant, and it's more monotonous than ever:
"...versus their parents' generations' in what they don't realize (or won't accept) was an unfair earlier era, and asking "What happened?"..."

Ok, :powerlevel: time.

I actually would read Bob's blog way back before he would ever start doing videos. (Yes, I have been enjoying this thread since page 15 because of that.) Part of why I was quit was because of stuff like the above. He would be on a point that was alllllllllmost right, then zoom off into insanity.

Now he's gotten worse.

Like above. Yeah, back during the baby boomer era, around the 50s-70s? He's right, it was an unfair era. Only not because of racism*, but because of a little thing called WORLD WAR TWO. When your nation is the only one left with a manufacturing base while everybody's is blown to hell, you're going to enjoy a bit of an economic advantage until everybody else rebuilds and their workers grow out of diapers. (It also helped that a few who escaped the war then decided to destroy their manufacturing by communism.) Also, most of the USA's competition back then would have been other white and oriental nations.

*Well ok, there was racism back then but blacks were still improving economically at the time as well. If he wants to talk about policies propping up the white man against a black competitor let's see him address ye olde minimum wage laws and union contracts.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Asa_Spades60
His own audience seems to be turning against him and I love it.

This is why it is always wise to keep your trap shut about your political beliefs, unless your job pertains to it. You are going to isolate potential audience members and furthermore, you could cultivate a truly toxic fanbase that might eat you alive once you do something against what they like.
 
The sad thing is Bob is probably just chalking that up to people being racist homophobes afraid of the superior future. I'm sure even if his Patreon drops to under $1,000, he would just blame republicans and racists.
Does that mean we can claim the Republicans were funding Bob all along?
 
Look at those major cosmopolitan havens like Detroit or the South Side of Chicago, they're the future.
View attachment 256606

I'm always baffled by SJWs' fetishization of "diversity", as if it were a moral imperative. Ok, you may argue that diversity leads to a proliferation of viewpoints which we can learn from, but this contradicts with another obsession of SJWs -- cultural appropriation. You can observe all the diverse, international cultures "in the best places of the US", but if you make use of their ideas you're damned to SJW hell. On the other hand, pee o'sees can never make use of whities culture because there is literally none; all whities have is money, which of course pee o' sees deserve a share automatically -- but if it is money they want we don't have to let them into the First World: why not just leave them in their shithole countries and pump international aids there?
 
And also the latest from SJW Mario that implicitly calls out Bob. That he ended up retweeting:
View attachment 256818
Has anyone tried to call Bob a bigot because he's fond of an Italian stereotype and Italians having a history of being discriminated against in the US? He'd probably deny it like how he thinks the Odyssey shitstorm was a false flag but it'd be funny to see him try to justify his Mario love with SJWisms.
 
Last edited:
What?

Who's afraid of post-industrial technology? FFS, literally everyone has a smartphone and some sort of social media account.

Bob pulled that straight out of his ass.
He thinks literally everyone outside of the coastal states is literally a society of Judge Hawthorne's and Goody Osburns.

Like, he unironically believes Nebraska still practices witchburnings. I'm certain of it. If I told Moviebob they hanged a woman because she used a hairdryer he'd actually believe me.
 
Has anyone tried to call Bob a bigot because he's fond of an Italian stereotype and Italians having a history of being discriminated against in the US? He'd probably see through it like how he thinks the Odyssey shitstorm was a false flag but it'd be funny to see him try to justify his Mario love with SJWisms.
Don't forget Mario games frequently use the damsel in distress trope which is a SJW no no. I always wondered how Bob deals with a franchise he likes being so problematic to his ideology.
 
Does Bob actually think that shitkickers and rednecks were legitimately afraid of being replaced by robots years from now and that's why they voted for Trump?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back