- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
Yes, but the technology gap is closing, so Africans are a lot harder to conquer than they were when they mostly only had spears. If the European powers had had to face large armies or militias all equipped with modern rifles and guerilla warfare tactics (as in, say, the Portuguese colonies during the Colonial War, which ended in the colonies' independence after the Portuguese Army was unable to fully suppress them), they'd have been far more hesitant to commit to conquering Africa as opposed to just trading with it.
The population dynamics have changed as well. Europe had a bigger population than Africa until the 1990s, and now Africa's is over twice as large. It's a lot harder to face a rebellion that's multiple times bigger. A revolt in, say, Ethiopia (population 100 million or so) could be millions strong. 19th century Africa was very sparsely populated by comparison.
Given that I'm a member of the National Raygun Association I'm hardly going to argue against this. They should be armed.
Though i would love to see Bob try and deal with a "guns keep Africa from being recolonized" argument.