Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[RockVolnutt]

Bob doesn't seem to understand politics on a local level. I think he thinks only Congressional reps and the presidency matter. While I could be wrong there Bob's political ideology is so ill defined and stupid it's hard to say.

Why should he when the Superior Future has no borders and an all powerful world government? Submit or be Obsolete.

 

[Jetpack Himmler]

His not so subtle dig at Wonder Woman for “not being as terrible as other DC films”. The movie was pretty damn good and more entertaining than recent MCU films, Blobbo. Your MCU fanboy is coming out again.

Bob must be salty over the fact that Marvel was not able to shit out a Captain Marvel film before WB released Wonder Woman and he cannot shit all over it because a woman directed it. Not that it stopped other people like this guy I consider "Bob-lite" who carped on Petty Jenkins, but would call you a racist if you criticized Ryan Coogler.

That said, I quite enjoyed Wonder Woman. Gal Gadot can come off as wooden at times, but she pours more effort into the role than a lot of the actresses in the MCU who act like they are in it for the paycheque. It had a nice story arc for Diana and that "No Man's Land" scene is one of the most iconic and inspiring I have seen in the genre. Bob and his acolytes can go fuck themselves if they give it backhanded "praise" for not sucking as bad as other DCEU films.

 

[Chan the Wizard]

I hate to say it, but Bob's right on this one. Salva is a convicted pedophile and the fact that he continues to receive work is mind-boggling. And his work is mediocre at best. Jeepers Creepers, while having an interesting concept, also has tons of flaws that prevent it from being far better then it actually is.

Jeepers Creepers, like all of Salva’s films, has serious pedophile themes.
Like the fact the monster tracks the teenage boy by smelling a pair of his briefs.

I really hate Salva, all of his work is incredibly creepy when you know what to look for, he went to prison for raping one of the boys that acted in Clownhouse and he should not be working in the field at all when there are better, non-pedo directors.

 

[LordofCringe7206]

Jeepers Creepers, like all of Salva’s films, has serious pedophile themes.
Like the fact the monster tracks the teenage boy by smelling a pair of his briefs.

You know, I never realized that until you just said it. The more I think about it, your absolutely right.

 

[Brother Wind]

Imagine someone dissing South Carolina-style barbecue sauce.

Well they'd have to be from like Korea, Kansas, or Texas. Although, I'm pretty fond of Kansas's sweeter style.

Getting on topic, but I don't know if you're really off topic talking about food and Bob. I think his brother is also Stupid Liberal

 

[Gordon Cole]

"How can I make #ChangeTheChannel about me?"

Only he can sperg about wrasslin' while going to bat for postmodernism.

I hate to say it, but Bob's right on this one. Salva is a convicted pedophile and the fact that he continues to receive work is mind-boggling. And his work is mediocre at best. Jeepers Creepers, while having an interesting concept, also has tons of flaws that prevent it from being far better then it actually is.

I don't disagree, I'm just making fun of him saying that he made nothing worthwhile despite being more of a director than Bob'll ever be.

 

[The Nothingness]

"How can I make #ChangeTheChannel about me?"

Considering it was a cast of one, is that really something you want to pat yourself on the back for?

 

[UglyOldJafar]

For a Bonus, tweet all of that shit to Boston's local CPS office and let them know that Chris Chipman is allowing someone with these backwards views access to his young, impressionable daughter.

I know this is not very civil to say, but.... fuck you.
If you want to make Bob suffer by making his family tell him to grow up or piss off because he is acting like an awful human being, that is okay.
I draw a line however at trying to make a person suffer whose major crime at this point is simply to be related to that asshole. And I am not just talking here about Bob's brother, but also the little girl who could be separated by her parents who seem to genuinely take good care for her aside of letting her hang out with uncle "kill the farmers".
You want to see Bob suffer? Send him a birthday cake and let nature take its course. But do not go for his family.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

I know this is not very civil to say, but.... fuck you.
If you want to make Bob suffer by making his family tell him to grow up or piss off because he is acting like an awful human being, that is okay.
I draw a line however at trying to make a person suffer whose major crime at this point is simply to be related to that asshole. And I am not just talking here about Bob's brother, but also the little girl who could be separated by her parents who seem to genuinely take good care for her aside of letting her hang out with uncle "kill the farmers".
You want to see Bob suffer? Send him a birthday cake and let nature take its course. But do not go for his family.

This is the same reason I feel sorry for all the random people who got involved in Chris sagas. Mary Lee Walsh doesn't deserve emails saying JULAY or whatever.

 

[RockVolnutt]

I find it strange that Bob calls wrestling "geek culture". Putting aside any issues with that term, I'm pretty sure it's more associated with rednecks and is maybe one step below sperging about NASCAR.

 

[UglyOldJafar]

I find it strange that Bob calls wrestling "geek culture". Putting aside any issues with that term, I'm pretty sure it's more associated with rednecks and is maybe one step below sperging about NASCAR.

Is there even anything to sperg about in NASCAR?
As for the wrestling geek out, let me propose something: If you want to get him annoyed people, just send him links to that Wrestling Episode of South Park. We all know he wants to see Trey and Matt dead.

 

[Boss HM-2]

Only he can sperg about wrasslin' while going to bat for postmodernism.
View attachment 422372

He talks about postmodern narratives in wrestling yet doesn't realize that Braun is full-on babyface (his last couple of feuds involved Elias and the BAR, both heels).
Postmodernism takes on wrestling aren't even new either; Here's an essay about French wrestling in the 50's written by none other than Roland "Death of the Author" Barthes himself.

 

[BR55]

He also only cares about the Supreme Court having ultra liberal judges in there. Hence why he bitches at you to vote for Democrats, no matter if they fuck you over.

Chinatown is also one of the most iconic American films of the New Hollywood Era. Terrific performances and a flawless script is what makes it so iconic. That movie has a more cultural impact than Black Panther.

Oh Bob you are such a fucking Drone. "Elect people for no other reason than what political Party they are a part off". Yes sir Bob is a Thinking American Who Matters all right.

 

[Gordon Cole]

I like how the randy realized his mistake, and Bob looks like the asshole.

And you're leaving a legacy of diabetes and moronic opinions about capeshit.

Is he gonna cry about Sears going out of business next?

 

[AZ 594]

Is he gonna cry about Sears going out of business next?
View attachment 422434

It's a little disturbing seeing him have this much emotional attachment over a store while calling for the genocide of real people.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

He also only cares about the Supreme Court having ultra liberal judges in there. Hence why he bitches at you to vote for Democrats, no matter if they fuck you over.

Chinatown is also one of the most iconic American films of the New Hollywood Era. Terrific performances and a flawless script is what makes it so iconic. That movie has a more cultural impact than Black Panther.

The Supreme Court doesn't make amendments, it interprets them. Repealing an amendment requires passing a new one, and that involves getting a 2/3 majority in both houses of Congress, then ratification by 3/4 of the states - as in, the legislative branch. So, no, Bob, the judicial branch isn't everything, and getting 3/4 of the states to repeal part of the Bill of Rights is fantasy. You can't do that with just the "superior" states.

 

[Kyria the Great]

The Supreme Court doesn't make amendments, it interprets them. Repealing an amendment requires passing a new one, and that involves getting a 2/3 majority in both houses of Congress, then ratification by 3/4 of the states - as in, the legislative branch. So, no, Bob, the judicial branch isn't everything, and getting 3/4 of the states to repeal part of the Bill of Rights is fantasy. You can't do that with just the "superior" states.

Especially when Illinois, California, and New York try to overplay their power and you have a president that makes a tax overhaul plan that fucks over their upper middle residents so it is best for the "superior States" to play civil or far worse and more creative penalties can come into effect.

 

[RockVolnutt]

The Supreme Court doesn't make amendments, it interprets them. Repealing an amendment requires passing a new one, and that involves getting a 2/3 majority in both houses of Congress, then ratification by 3/4 of the states - as in, the legislative branch. So, no, Bob, the judicial branch isn't everything, and getting 3/4 of the states to repeal part of the Bill of Rights is fantasy. You can't do that with just the "superior" states.

I wonder how popular "We need to get rid of the 2nd amendment" is among Democrats since I've seen more arguing about regulation of guns. Have a feeling it'd almost as much of a pipe dream as Bob's :autism: belief that Democrats will willingly create the "Superior Future" where the US and thus their positions/power don't exist.

 

[Mola Ram]

The Supreme Court doesn't make amendments, it interprets them. Repealing an amendment requires passing a new one, and that involves getting a 2/3 majority in both houses of Congress, then ratification by 3/4 of the states - as in, the legislative branch. So, no, Bob, the judicial branch isn't everything, and getting 3/4 of the states to repeal part of the Bill of Rights is fantasy. You can't do that with just the "superior" states.

To be fair, I don't think Bob really makes that argument. What he's doing, I think, is pushing the view that the 2d Amendment will be a dead letter with enough left wing jurists on the Court. And he's not wrong -- all they'd have to do is overturn Heller, then come up with their own preferred interpretation of what the 2d is supposed to apply to. This just happened in Bob's own Massachusetts, where a district judge (and, sigh, a Reagan appointee) held that the 2d Amendment does not cover AR-15s.

 

[Flexo]

The Supreme Court doesn't make amendments, it interprets them. Repealing an amendment requires passing a new one, and that involves getting a 2/3 majority in both houses of Congress, then ratification by 3/4 of the states - as in, the legislative branch. So, no, Bob, the judicial branch isn't everything, and getting 3/4 of the states to repeal part of the Bill of Rights is fantasy. You can't do that with just the "superior" states.

I rated you optimistic because...

To be fair, I don't think Bob really makes that argument. What he's doing, I think, is pushing the view that the 2d Amendment will be a dead letter with enough left wing jurists on the Court. And he's not wrong -- all they'd have to do is overturn Heller, then come up with their own preferred interpretation of what the 2d is supposed to apply to. This just happened in Bob's own Massachusetts, where a district judge (and, sigh, a Reagan appointee) held that the 2d Amendment does not cover AR-15s.

Oh. Well Mola Ram beat me to it. It seems nowadays a lot of democrats are taking the position on the constitution an old democrat president did on the supreme court: "let them enforce it."

Sad part is, that won't end well for the country. (i.e. If places like California can be sanctuary states for illegal immigrants, other states might wonder why they can't be sanctuary states for say... illegal guns.)