Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
New article:
Spider-Man Theory: The MCU Already Has The Perfect Venom Candidate
The question of if Venom is or isn’t part of the MCU still lingers, but it may be better for it to be separate – if only because Marvel’s already got the perfect Symbiote analog. The morally-complicated alien “Symbiote” who typically originates as part of the Spider-Man mythos will arrive in 2018 theaters for a solo feature from Sony starring Tom Hardy as an investigative journalist who becomes the “host” for the alien creature of the title.

The film, which has been in development in some form or another as far back as Spider-Man 3 in 2007, had been planned (along with Gina Prince-Blythewood’s Silver & Black) as part of Sony’s spin-off universe of features based on tertiary Spider-Man characters before the deal was struck to reconnect Peter Parker’s relaunched adventures to the official Marvel Cinematic Universe. It remains unclear (and unconfirmed) whether or not Venom or any of these spin-off features will be officially connected to either Spider-Man or the MCU-proper, and rumors persist that the decision may rest both on how the films are received and yet-to-be-formed opinions of Marvel heavy-hitters like Kevin Feige.

What makes that unusual is that, while Venom remains a somewhat divisive figure in the Spider-Man fandom, there’s no denying that he remains one of Marvel’s most recognizable and popular characters in terms of merchandise sales. So it’s somewhat surprising that the studio would let its first MCU-era (if not necessarily MCU-connected) film appearance be in a mid-budget early-October release controlled by another company. But is it possible (whether it’s the plan or not) that Marvel already has a more interesting take on Venom – one that would both be a unique 21st Century reinvention of the core concept but also closer to the original Symbiote storyline than the Sony film seems to be – already waiting in Spider-Man: Homecoming?

Even among Spider-Man villains, Venom’s origin story is convoluted and absurd. As part of the hype for the original 1980s Secret Wars crossover, some of the Marvel heroes who were zapped off to outer space for the event series returned to their main series sporting radically-changed costumes and team-compositions in subsequent issues in order to encourage readers to go back and learn what happened. For Spidey, the big change was a slick new black and white “alien” suit with an unlimited webbing supply, shape-shifting costume-change powers and other cool gimmicks.

However, in what turned into one of the most memorable long-term storylines in the character’s history, the “costume” turned out to be a living, sentient organism (discovered in what was essentially a cosmic vending machine during Secret Wars) with parasitic tendencies called a Symbiote, which developed a jealous obsession with Peter Parker that led to him having violent episodes as Spider-Man and deciding to separate himself from the creature permanently. Eventually, the Symbiote found a new host in Eddie Brock, a disgraced journalist who blamed Peter Parker for his career ending, and they bonded to become Venom – who hates Spider-Man but has been otherwise known to see itself as a “lethal protector” superhero in its own right.

The plot of Sony’s Venom movie has been kept under wraps for the most part, but looks to diverge fairly radically from both the original comics or previous incarnations of the character, with Hardy’s version of Eddie Brock being a good guy journalist who becomes bonded to Venom while investigating the nefarious doings of the Life Foundation. While the origin story appears wholly changed (seemingly removing Spider-Man himself from equation entirely, though it’s possible some tangential connection could end up being a surprise twist) it seems likely that the change has an understandable aim: getting Venom more quickly into the “anti-hero” version of the character many younger fans are more familiar with.

But while that’s all well and good for Venom, it seems a shame that Tom Holland’s Spider-Manwould potentially be robbed of not only a classic Spidey storyline but one uniquely well-suited to his “kid figuring things out” take on Peter Parker. The brilliance of the Symbiote suit story, even before Venom shows up, is that it literalizes the core thematic struggle of the main character’s life: Peter always feels like his duties in the Spidey-suit are symbolically pulling him away from his family, friends, love-life, etc – what if the suit started actually physically dragging him off against his will for real? It’s a brilliantly creepy idea, loaded with extra metaphoric layers about addiction and identity that one can see Holland making great use of – too bad it’s already been claimed by someone else’s movie.

Or is it?

If Spider-Man: Homecoming can be said to have a prime directive outside of storytelling (and “add more Iron Man“) it’s racking up fanboy-points hitting details that fans have complained for years were missing from previous incarnations of the character. Perhaps most notably among such complaints is the tendency of Peter to constantly tell jokes and talk to himself via interior-monologue, a famous fixture of the comics that previous live-action incarnations dialed back significantly – mostly because monologuing out loud in such circumstances can look awkward in live-action (as can omniscient voiceover narration). Homecoming opts to solve this problem via Spider-Man’s newly-reestablished linked to the MCU, gifting the new Tony Stark-designed high-tech Spider-suit with its own J.A.R.V.I.S-like A.I. that Peter names “Karen.”


Much like J.A.R.V.I.S. was even before he was the Vision (the voice is provided by actress Jennifer Connelly, Vision-actor Paul Bettany’s real-life wife), Karen appears to be not simply artificially-intelligent but also quasi-sentient, making jokes and showing apparent concern for Peter’s emotional state – excitedly asking “Is that Liz?” (whom Peter had been asking for advice about) and encouraging him to kiss her. She’s also capable of taking control of the suit and acting independently of Peter (or at the command of others, like Tony or Happy Hogan).

In other words, from a certain perspective, Karen could be said to already be something very much like the original pre-Venom Symbiote entity: a manifestation of Peter’s Spider-Man side incarnated within his suit that helps him do his crimefighting and, in a very real sense, serves as a kind of co-pilot for the Spider-Man identity (unlike J.A.R.V.IS., which inhabited the entirety of Tony Stark’s personal data network even before he constructed the Iron Man armor, Karen appears to be native to the Spider-Man suit).

If her programming were to “go bad” in some way – something Avengers: Age of Ultron and Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. already established precedence for in the MCU – activating his more lethal weaponry without being asked to, withholding information, acting possessive of his time/attention, etc, she’d effectively be on her way to becoming a high-tech reimagining of the classic comics’ Venom… especially if she were to be spurned and take up with a new “host” to get back at Peter. Also notable, the “nanobot armors” currently employed by both Iron Man and Black Panther function in a manner not terribly different from the Symbiote suit’s traditional living liquid form.

The practical pieces necessary to tell a version of the Symbiote/Venom storyline which (save for the lack of a Secret Wars to return from) closer in tone, spirit and detail to the original comics version effectively popped into being the moment Ned disabled the “Training Wheels Protocols” in Homecoming. But how might it actually work, should anyone at Marvel Studios somehow have considered it?

Surely the most different thing about a Venom that starts out as Karen is Connelly’s distinctly feminine-identified voice, which can only add an unavoidable layer of creepiness to the “spurned jealous partner” aspect of Venom’s characterization. Is the evil suit now some more explicit variant of a jealous ex? A stalker? Given the relentless focus on the MCU Spidey’s teenage-ness, will Peter be scolded for not being upfront with his armor about the friend-zone? Or maybe Karen-Venom is, at first, more like an overprotective maternal figure.

In any context, the most pressing question would likely end up being whether the “final” version of Venom (i.e. someone else wearing the presumably now-scary-monster-faced version of the suit) is played by a male or female actor in this scenario. On the one hand, Connelly herself stepping in front of the camera as a female take on Eddie (Edith? Edie?) Brock could be a welcome shakeup, on the other hand, the traditional “tough guy” Eddie playing out the “We are Venom” double-act with a female-voiced living-suit has fascinating dramatic implications.

None of this, of course, is a terribly likely scenario. For all the talk of Sony’s relative autonomy with the Spider-Man properties outside of the crossover material, few genuinely believe that the fiscally-troubled studio would be permitted to shoot a whole Tom Hardy vehicle featuring a character Disney/Marvel-proper had actual plans for in the near future. But, should the spectacle of Hardy morphing into a toothy CGI prune-juice monster to flip motorcycle-henchmen in industrial parks somehow not morph into the billion-dollar multi-feature franchise someone at Sony appears to think it will, it’s possible the Marvel Cinematic Universe could end up tasked with breathing new life into Venom – and if so, Karen might be as good a place to start as any.
https://screenrant.com/venom-mcu-sp...ial-Distribution&utm_campaign=SR-TW&view=list

TL;DR: He wants the suit from Homecoming to act as Peter's Venom.
 
New article:

https://screenrant.com/venom-mcu-sp...ial-Distribution&utm_campaign=SR-TW&view=list

TL;DR: He wants the suit from Homecoming to act as Peter's Venom.
Bob's a fucking moron. He's essentially begging for Spiderman to be held hostage by the suit, a thing that was actually done in the Iron Man comics during an arc when Tony's newest model of suit gained a deeper sense of self and became obsessed with him and protecting him. He also proves he knows jackshit about the symbiote given it wasn't just a 'jilted lover'; it was an alien abomination that also had its own dark urges and a fucked sense of morality that bonded with a good at heart guy down on his luck and a deep abiding hatred for Spiderman ruining his life.

He's also desperately thirstposting for a Mary Jane Venom; it's that obvious.
 
New article:

https://screenrant.com/venom-mcu-sp...ial-Distribution&utm_campaign=SR-TW&view=list

TL;DR: He wants the suit from Homecoming to act as Peter's Venom.

Oh my god... he is such a fucking retard of colossal portions.

This entire article was written bad. Venom is not a divisive figure in the fandom. He remains one of the most popular characters in the Spider-Man universe and the Marvel universe as a whole. Just because you hate the character doesn't mean other people do Bob.

The origin story for Venom really isn't convoluted or absurd either. Pretty straightforward: an alien parasitic organism that needs to bond to a host to survive. It is called a symbiote, and it has terrible effects on the host. Peter Parker falls victim to it, but manages to free himself. The symbiote ends up acquiring a new host: Eddie Brock, a person who holds a grudge against Peter Parker for various reasons. The two combine to form Venom, a monstrous entity that provides quite possibly the biggest challenge to Spider-Man.

Lastly: no. No to everything else that comes with your proposal. Your idea is stupid, poorly thought out and actually far more absurd than the original Venom origin story. It is not a better telling of the Venom origin story, it's just a poor fan-fiction type idea for the character.

And while we of course have to wait to see what actually happens, but the Venom film is likely going to be a major success and your precious Disney corporation won't be able to get their greedy, slimy claws on it.
 
Oh my god... he is such a fucking exceptional individual of colossal portions.

This entire article was written bad. Venom is not a divisive figure in the fandom. He remains one of the most popular characters in the Spider-Man universe and the Marvel universe as a whole. Just because you hate the character doesn't mean other people do Bob.

The origin story for Venom really isn't convoluted or absurd either. Pretty straightforward: an alien parasitic organism that needs to bond to a host to survive. It is called a symbiote, and it has terrible effects on the host. Peter Parker falls victim to it, but manages to free himself. The symbiote ends up acquiring a new host: Eddie Brock, a person who holds a grudge against Peter Parker for various reasons. The two combine to form Venom, a monstrous entity that provides quite possibly the biggest challenge to Spider-Man.

Lastly: no. No to everything else that comes with your proposal. Your idea is stupid, poorly thought out and actually far more absurd than the original Venom origin story. It is not a better telling of the Venom origin story, it's just a poor fan-fiction type idea for the character.

And while we of course have to wait to see what actually happens, but the Venom film is likely going to be a major success and your precious Disney corporation won't be able to get their greedy, slimy claws on it.
And people read his slop!? It's obvious that he just gleaned a Wikipedia article and called it a day. Read the fucking comics and talk to people outside of your personal bubble, Fatty Fuhrer.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Mola Ram and Flexo
He also proves he knows jackshit about the symbiote given it wasn't just a 'jilted lover'; it was an alien abomination that also had its own dark urges and a fucked sense of morality that bonded with a good at heart guy down on his luck and a deep abiding hatred for Spiderman ruining his life.

TBF they retconned this when the guardians visited the symbiote homeworld. But come on, Chipman. Your fucking line of tweets are now deemed worthless after this article. He doesn't understand the shit he's talking about. He just parrots what the wikipedia article tells him with no insight on what makes the character, or the concept tick.

Once again don't insult the intelligence of long time comic book readers, Bob. You're NEVER winning that fight.
 
TBF they retconned this when the guardians visited the symbiote homeworld. But come on, Chipman. Your fucking line of tweets are now deemed worthless after this article. He doesn't understand the shit he's talking about. He just parrots what the wikipedia article tells him with no insight on what makes the character, or the concept tick.

Once again don't insult the intelligence of long time comic book readers, Bob. You're NEVER winning that fight.
That's the worst thing about Bob as a critic; no matter if he has seen a product or not, he pays no attention at all to it. Be it his beloved Mario to anything in comics, all he does is make inane headcanon horseshit that is rarely even close to what actually happens in it and then die on this hill of equine manure based on petty childish reasons and ego.
 
Well he was my favorite character as I love roguish characters with a sense of going their own way to solve their problems. I think Bob hates him because he is X-men, isn't owned by Disney yet, and most importantly hates morally grey characters.
Nah, I think this is pre Avengers. It's like the weirdest thing I noted even before I hated him. He's made a lot of snide comments about the Gambit movie and not understanding why people wanted it. Like everything he's saying about Venom. Replace that with Gambit.
 
Nah, I think this is pre Avengers. It's like the weirdest thing I noted even before I hated him. He's made a lot of snide comments about the Gambit movie and not understanding why people wanted it. Like everything he's saying about Venom. Replace that with Gambit.

I'm guessing everything Bob knows about Gambit came from that 1990's X-Men cartoon. All I remember from that was Gambit's attempts to woo Rogue (which Bob might see as problematic since they don't involve Gambit becoming a feminist, standing a respectful distance from the object of his attraction at all times, and practicing his hoverhand with every girl he takes a picture with. )

Also, Bob's "suggestions" for improving or rebooting 80's franchises are entertaining, but not for the reasons he thinks they are. Anyone who uses the name "Care Bears" with the term, "Paradise Lost Crossover" has got to be unhinged or deliberately trying to write the most random and epic of crackfics.
 
Also, Bob's "suggestions" for improving or rebooting 80's franchises are entertaining, but not for the reasons he thinks they are. Anyone who uses the name "Care Bears" with the term, "Paradise Lost Crossover" has got to be unhinged or deliberately trying to write the most random and epic of crackfics.
For all his talk about "forward not backward", Bob sure seems to be bankrupt and scared intellectual property wise and instead relies on remakes, reboots, and sequels. I feel he's too scared to come up with something new regardless if its a new IP or existing property.

Maybe that's why he has a love-boner for Disney right now, since their current strategy consists on property branding and endless amount of sequels, prequels, reboots, and remakes.
 
Continuing to miss the point.
MetGala.JPG
BadGuy.JPG


Finding out that the world doesn't give a shit about Mario 3.
VirtualSwitch.JPG
 
Finding out that the world doesn't give a shit about Mario 3.
virtualswitch-jpg.444573
I do sort of see his point; the problem with video game history as a whole is that it's not as easily accessible as say books or movies. You want to watch a movie from the 1940s? Just get the DVD. Classic book from the 1800s? Same thing. Video games on the other hand aren't that simple. If you want to play, say, Donkey Kong Country, you need to buy an actual SNES in order to play the game, or at least a device that can play the cartridge. This is why emulation has become so big, because it allows you to play virtually everything but at the cost of not playing it on a device (which is why I'm personally not a fan). So classic gaming boils down to buying the device and the game, purchasing and downloading it on a modern gaming platform, or just downloading a free emulator and a free ROM.

However, what I don't agree with is the idea that the industry is only keeping a few well-known available. Have you seen the PS2 classics section on PSN? Some of those games are cult classics that didn't sell well. Hell, Nintendo's done a really solid job with having obscure games on their Virtual Console. The issue then isn't so much just selling the big classic games and more to do with the ongoing debate about whether it's worth buying or just downloading it for free.
 
The issue then isn't so much just selling the big classic games and more to do with the ongoing debate about whether it's worth buying or just downloading it for free.

that and the question what people would consider a classic. And seeing how Bob's definition of a classic or masterpiece is somewhere between Mario Bros 3 and an Avenger movie, we can all assure that he most likely has no idea what a good game is, even if the characters would jump out of the screen and rub their balls all over his face.
 
Continuing to miss the point.
Bob doesn't seem to realize that people don't have a problem with immigrants coming to America as long as they come here legally. What they have a problem with is immigrants coming to America illegally and taking people's jobs and screw them over.

I mean, he should oppose the DACA program. I know Absolutego already said this: but DACA puts "illegal immigrants who came here as children into a bureaucratic shitfest where although they'll be protected from be deportation, they have no path to citizenship and have to regularly check in with ICE. And, because it was an executive decision made by Obama rather than legislation, it's effectively turned that entire group into hostages to force the Latino community to keep voting in Democrat presidents.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back