- Joined
- Feb 10, 2015
Lmao calling Bob a boomer is his new trigger. And no Bob, the Boomer birth year can range from 1946-1964.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bob may not be a technical boomer but his opinions are pure boomer. Case in point: his love of Star Trek TOS (and not TNG).Lmao calling Bob a boomer is his new trigger. And no Bob, the Boomer birth year can range from 1946-1964.
To the slightest defense possible, live action Cinderella was genuinely good, potentially better than the animated version even. And beauty and the beast was fine because it was almost a shot for shot remake(in a few scenes it literally is).Really? Moviebob's surprised that a Live Action Disney Remake isn't very good? He's always way behind the curve if he's even on it at all.
Here’s Bob flipping out after somebody told him Black Panther doesn’t deserve Best Picture.
View attachment 663012
View attachment 663014
The bicycle would break as a result of Bob trying to get on it and ride.
Jesus christ!Well,it's seems Russ cucked out from The Escapist,I wonder how Bob will react
https://twitter.com/russpitts/status/1095028051904217088
https://archive.fo/gAYub
![]()
Didn't we make it to the moon because of.... you know, one nation competing against another nation to see who could get there first? Seems to me if Bob wants his moon wheat, the better option would be to try and get seperate nations to fight ovetoit rather than pushing for a one world government.
I'm genuinely curious about Bob's opinions on space colonization and futurism. Does he think the future will be like a space opera show, with a benevolent world government, FTL, aliens who aren't millions of years more or less advanced than us, etc?
lel Bob's main crusader at the Escapist is now gone, eagerly anticipating Firing Saga 2: Electric Boogaloo.Well,it's seems Russ cucked out from The Escapist,I wonder how Bob will react
https://twitter.com/russpitts/status/1095028051904217088
https://archive.fo/gAYub
![]()
I'd use The Original Series as a reference for Bob's future, as he doesn't like any of the series that came afterwards. Bob's superior future is basically a more authoritarian version of Roddenberry's weird utopian space communism.That is exactly what he thinks.
Watch any episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation, and you have a good idea of what Bob thinks the future will be like. Now consider he believes we lost that utopia because Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, and you're well on your way to understanding why this adipose-raddled buffoon is about to hit 2000 pages in this thread.
I'd use The Original Series as a reference for Bob's future, as he doesn't like any of the series that came afterwards. Bob's superior future is basically a more authoritarian version of Roddenberry's weird utopian space communism.
Plus I like to imagine Q discovering Bob.I was going with the series that was new when he was a kid, which is the kind of material that seems to have permanently warped his brain. Where has he said he dislikes the later series? I'd be curious to see how exceptional his take is.
Moviebob said:See, I'm TOS/Kirk all the way. So for me, the mere presence of some bike-jumps and martial-arts (that's Sophia Boutella from KINGSMEN as the lady alien, incidentally) doesn't in itself undermine anything essential about STAR TREK - especially since it's the Kirk-era that's being rebooted here. Original-recipe TREK ("my" TREK) was always at its best balancing adventure and intrigue with big ideas and forward-thinking vision. Yes, it would explore out-there sci-fi concepts like parallel-evolution or time-travel and grapple with issues like race, class and philosophy, but it would also "hook" you with action, melodrama, alien monsters, etc. TOS would frequently (an unapologetically) use whatever space-magic it could conjure in order to throw Kirk and company into old-west gunfights, gladiator arenas, monster battles or whatever else - if they could've afforded a motocross stunt, I'm sure they'd have done it and Shatner etc would've been all over it.
But that's me, I'm a TOS guy. If you're coming from the (totally legitimate) place where THE NEXT GENERATION and it's progeny are the "true" STAR TREK, well... firstly I'm always interested to hear how that squares with the now widely-understood revelations that TNG was only able to flourish creatively when other writers and producers were able to wrest control away from Roddenberry. But beyond that, I "get" where this looks like a total pass for you.
They don't mean Baby Boomer this Boomer is a term younger people use to describe 30 plus people obsessed with 80's and can't move on so Bob is a Boomer.
lel Bob's main crusader at the Escapist is now gone, eagerly anticipating Firing Saga 2: Electric Boogaloo.
That is exactly what he thinks.
Watch any episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation, and you have a good idea of what Bob thinks the future will be like. Now consider he believes we lost that utopia because Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, and you're well on your way to understanding why this adipose-raddled buffoon is about to hit 2000 pages in this thread.
Live by the Woke, die by the Woke.Well, it's seems Russ cucked out from The Escapist
What did Russ Pitts do again?Live by the Woke, die by the Woke.