Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
The day this device ever comes to fruition is the day the MGTOWs and damn dirty MRAs win. What use will there be for women if we can just grow our own children?
So it was ironic that radfems like Shulamith Firestone thought artificial wombs would eliminate a major source of oppression to women and would truly make women on par with men.

Caroline may be a socialist retard but she does have a point, though not the one that she wants to make. This is the furthering of making women into men by taking the one of the few things they, and only they, can do which is birthing a child.
You want more irony? Communism had from the get go saw women chiefly as producers of new generations of proletariats (and also a reserve labor force).

Guess whose hand it is?
E2HCJbdXMAAA8El.jpg
t57.png

Ma, no hands!
E2G4pyTX0AMsPNo.jpg
t57.png

Mosh pits.
t57.png

Chris likes P!nk too!
Untitled.png

There is a 14-minute Third Person video in which (I think) he mostly talks about his house.
 
So it was ironic that radfems like Shulamith Firestone thought artificial wombs would eliminate a major source of oppression to women and would truly make women on par with men.


You want more irony? Communism had from the get go saw women chiefly as producers of new generations of proletariats (and also a reserve labor force).

Guess whose hand it is?
View attachment 2195864
View attachment 2195868

Ma, no hands!
View attachment 2195865
View attachment 2195867

Mosh pits.
View attachment 2195873

Chris likes P!nk too!
View attachment 2195878

There is a 14-minute Third Person video in which (I think) he mostly talks about his house.
Oh boy. That most pits shit makes me sad that hardcore/punk culture has been appropriated and gentrified. Step in a mosh pit, be prepared for injury. You want to go home without bruising? Stay closer to the bar

Also, Chris has perhaps the most pretentious and stupidest documented taste in beer I've seen. I hope he at least drank them in 6 sittings to be able to pay attention to the profiles instead of having everything taste kind of like the strong flavored ones. If not, why not just buy the cheapest 6 pack that doesn't give you the runs?
 
This is dumb since the MCU is bad with giving characters unneeded tacticool stuff or unneeded extra lines. Sure, they don't do black leather and usually keep the color schemes for the most part but that's about it. Never could think of a good name for the atheistic they're going for but I've had this conversation with people before. It's like how all the Ultimates in Ultimate Marvel have that mix of leather and that odd ribbed material.

I think some of it is the "seeing the seams" problem. I'd hate to say "because realism" but, let's just take Daredevil here. Just one part of his costume.
1621821440651.png


Now seriously, how would you, as a costume maker, get a boot like the one on the right in the first place? The closest thing we have to them nowadays is cowboy boots - which you don't want to run around a city doing acrobatics in believe me. Plus they will not "hug" the leg like that or be skin tight. (they usually have handles on them to make it so you can pull them up) So well... the closest things you're going to get to the boot, is a lace up like on the right. (or maybe a kind with a zipper in the back? in either case I doubt the zipper is drawn in the comic)

Remember the most comic-book accurate costume we got of Batman was from Adam West's TV show. And you can watch several other superhero serials from back in the day to see what it was like when they really tried to make the costumes accurate (since simple tights could be done a shoestring budget). Some things are just going to be a consequence of tweaking things for reality. i.e. If Spiderman were to have a one piece outfit that allows him to do a split with his legs, then there's going to be a bulge in the crotch area where the extra fabric is to allow it.

We can also start posting videos of cosplayers who will provide in detail what the problem with every page-perfect costume is.

The day this device ever comes to fruition is the day the MGTOWs and damn dirty MRAs win. What use will there be for women if we can just grow our own children? It's no longer their body so it's no longer their choice. Enjoy no more alimony. Have all your feminist bullshit, just leave me and my homegrown son alone. Making light of this aside, this is dystopic as fuck man. Someone in the twitter comments said something that I never even thought of.
I'm sure we'll then learn that there were all kinds of unseen benefits to having women do the job. Like the warmth, heartbeat, and surrounding sounds helped reduce the chance the kid develops autism or something.

It doesn't hurt that it's also one of the highest-acclaimed and best-selling graphic novels of all time, so it's been reprinted constantly since its initial release, and it's thus very easy to get your hands on a copy.
Not to mention that if DC ever stops printing it, the rights revert back to Moore so they've kept it in the loop ever since.

Marvel Comics could have taken this as a business opportunity and leveraged the popularity of the MCU into promoting their side of the business. I think they have done some MCU tie-in comics, but those weren't marketed all that well to my knowledge, and they may or may not have been canonical at all. Still, they could have leaned into that more heavily and marketed a comics universe that was all new without decades of baggage, or at the very least created some "best-of" compilations for new heroes prior to their debut movies' release.
Yes they had a whole line of them.

Some even had movie images on the cover to encourage you to get them.

Canonicity is probably about as canon as the SW comics at this point.
 
Lol, Of course he's bad at beer too. A mix-6 is what you do to try out a few different brews from different breweries, but generally of the same or similar styles.

2 IPA's, 2 Porters (one of which is from what might as well be the British version of Budweiser), a stout, and a Trappist Dubbel Belgian is just fucking confused and gross. I can't really picture an order in which that ends well. It kind of screams "these are the most exotic beers I know, give me asspats for my wacky beer tastes!" Not to mention that's a waste of moneu for those "craft" brews because between the IPA and porter he's not really gonna get much of a taste out of that sixer except maybe an overall impression of dog puke.
 
Lol, Of course he's bad at beer too. A mix-6 is what you do to try out a few different brews from different breweries, but generally of the same or similar styles.

2 IPA's, 2 Porters (one of which is from what might as well be the British version of Budweiser), a stout, and a Trappist Dubbel Belgian is just fucking confused and gross. I can't really picture an order in which that ends well. It kind of screams "these are the most exotic beers I know, give me asspats for my wacky beer tastes!" Not to mention that's a waste of moneu for those "craft" brews because between the IPA and porter he's not really gonna get much of a taste out of that sixer except maybe an overall impression of dog puke.
Let's be generous and say each of those beers is about 3 dollars apiece. That's 18 dollars for a single night of booze, not counting whatever Chris may have spent on food. No wonder the guy is constantly screaming for money. If I were in desperate need of cash, the first thing I'd do is get rid of luxuries. Beer is a luxury. Chris is like the bum who begs at the street corner while sporting 300 dollar Nikes and loudly ordering high grade weed on the latest Apple iphone. He's full of shit, and anyone who gives him money is either blind or an idiot.
 
There is a 14-minute Third Person video in which (I think) he mostly talks about his house.
3 things

1. He's got both shots, outside, alone, acknowledges all of that and he's still wearing that stupid mask to be "setting a precedent right? I'm doing this for you to keep you safe and all that". What a cuck.

2. I think we get a shout out. He explains in the whole second half of the video the history of the house and everything he's had done to it. He says that he bought the house in 2012
Chris said:
This wasn't some gift. You know some people say *in a derpy voice* 'uh ya know uhhhh it's only ya only a nice house because they gave it to you whatever' and you know they definitely, uh my family is a great group of people but the will said, you know, it either went to one of the sons uhm or it was sold, you know, at fair market value so that what they did. They had the house appraised. I bought it fair and square. I own it and I'm very proud to have done that.
I am super curious if there's anyone else out there who questioned the passing of Chipman Manor to Chris's hands. If it's anything like the time he cried about his own laziness with his insurance and then complained about people not believing him then I'm guessing that there isn't anyone else who cares as much about Chris as we do. :heart-full:

3. The current appraisal estimate for the house after renovating it will be around "the mid $600,000 to low $700,000 range". He says that it's a good return on investment and then follows it up by saying "of course, you know, a little bit of it goes into the mortgage right? You do six figures worth of repairs. You gotta pay for it. But uhh, it's a renovation loan, low interest rate, they work it in so you're only going up a few hundred bucks a month". He then plugs his patreon.

BONUS THING!!1
There was lead paint in the kid's bedrooms and the removal was at some point part of his almost decade long rebuilding of the house.
 
3 things

1. He's got both shots, outside, alone, acknowledges all of that and he's still wearing that stupid mask to be "setting a precedent right? I'm doing this for you to keep you safe and all that". What a cuck.

2. I think we get a shout out. He explains in the whole second half of the video the history of the house and everything he's had done to it. He says that he bought the house in 2012

I am super curious if there's anyone else out there who questioned the passing of Chipman Manor to Chris's hands. If it's anything like the time he cried about his own laziness with his insurance and then complained about people not believing him then I'm guessing that there isn't anyone else who cares as much about Chris as we do. :heart-full:

3. The current appraisal estimate for the house after renovating it will be around "the mid $600,000 to low $700,000 range". He says that it's a good return on investment and then follows it up by saying "of course, you know, a little bit of it goes into the mortgage right? You do six figures worth of repairs. You gotta pay for it. But uhh, it's a renovation loan, low interest rate, they work it in so you're only going up a few hundred bucks a month". He then plugs his patreon.

BONUS THING!!1
There was lead paint in the kid's bedrooms and the removal was at some point part of his almost decade long rebuilding of the house.
3. Is Chris trying to tell us that his retarded tax problem leading to shameless ebegging was that he forgot that property tax is generally a linear function of assessed property value? That cannot possibly be more than a few hundred difference from what he paid after the last assessment. Does a homeowning engineer actually live paycheck to paycheck?
 
3 things

1. He's got both shots, outside, alone, acknowledges all of that and he's still wearing that stupid mask to be "setting a precedent right? I'm doing this for you to keep you safe and all that". What a cuck.

2. I think we get a shout out. He explains in the whole second half of the video the history of the house and everything he's had done to it. He says that he bought the house in 2012

I am super curious if there's anyone else out there who questioned the passing of Chipman Manor to Chris's hands. If it's anything like the time he cried about his own laziness with his insurance and then complained about people not believing him then I'm guessing that there isn't anyone else who cares as much about Chris as we do. :heart-full:

3. The current appraisal estimate for the house after renovating it will be around "the mid $600,000 to low $700,000 range". He says that it's a good return on investment and then follows it up by saying "of course, you know, a little bit of it goes into the mortgage right? You do six figures worth of repairs. You gotta pay for it. But uhh, it's a renovation loan, low interest rate, they work it in so you're only going up a few hundred bucks a month". He then plugs his patreon.

BONUS THING!!1
There was lead paint in the kid's bedrooms and the removal was at some point part of his almost decade long rebuilding of the house.
I have posted before on this, but Chris has increased the amount owed on his mortgage from under 300k to over 500k in the last decade. Chris continuously uses the value of his own home as collateral. And does anyone find Chris' home nice? I know that the Boston area has horrendously inflated housing price due to them treating increased density like a personal insult, but his house has always been dumpy, inside and out. His new kitchen is a huge improvement over the old brick and tile monstrosity, but his trash strewn yard and peeling walls are a prototype for the Resident Evil 7 setting.
 
Does a homeowning engineer actually live paycheck to paycheck?
If you spend more than you make, yes. Plus a lot of engineers lean way too fucking hard into the nerd persona. And since "nerd" has been gentrified to hell ever since companies realized they could squeeze some extra dollars by creating a new buying demogrsphic, every nerd thing is outrageously expensive. Many of them want the flashiest gizmos, nobody builds their own, it all adds up fast. And it's still uncool to be nerdy about cheap things, especially in certain circles. Then there's subscriptions. Too many engineers buy into the corporate rental model. Amazon prime, netflix, a whole bunch of other tech services I don't even know. Engineers are the perfect worker drones of the new world order.

It's sad, but a lot of engineers thrive on being hyperfocused in a certain subject and never branch out into an unrelated discipline, which is where innovation really comes from.

They also develop a certain personality flaw: when you're an expert in one thing, you start to see everything in those terms. Engineers become the most technocratic pains in the ass who have trouble accepting feedback from the people on site, even another engineer. I have literally had to explain basic safety concepts to other engineers that are absolutely fucking obvious to anybody, such as using a pontoon boat as a dive platform, 5 miles offshore, is absurdly unsafe.

Don't count on engineers to always make good decisions. We don't.
 
Bob is a sycophant for the powerful and the privileged, despises poor people, thinks war is no big deal and healthcare is just a "pet policy."

In what way is this idiot "left-wing"?
Because he simps for Troons, racial minorities, and feminists. And his hostility to poor people isn't so much necessarily due to them being poor as it is due them belonging to or voting for a right wing party - Bob would just as much want to gas a bunch of middle and upper-middle class suburbanites for voting Republican as he would Deep South trailer hicks.

Of course the points you bring up also stands, which opens up questions on just what exactly constitutes the left-right axis these days or if that paradigm even applies anymore, but that's a whole 'nother discussion on its own.
 
Untitled.png

E2H72ZpWEAIky9u.jpg

Untitled.png

OK, rather than judging by impression, let's see some hard data from CDC:
m4838a2f1.gif

And the reason of the decrease in infant mortality in the 1950s-60s?
CDC said:
From 1950 through 1964, infant mortality declined more slowly. An increasing proportion of infant deaths were attributed to perinatal causes and occurred among high-risk neonates, especially low birth weight (LBW) and preterm babies. Although no reliable data exist, the rapid decline in infant mortality during earlier decades probably was not influenced by decreases in LBW rates because the decrease in mortality was primarily in postneonatal deaths that are less influenced by birthweight. Inadequate programs during the 1950s-1960s to reduce deaths among high-risk neonates led to renewed efforts to improve access to prenatal care, especially for the poor, and to a concentrated effort to establish neonatal intensive-care units and to promote research in maternal and infant health, including research into technologies to improve the survival of LBW and preterm babies.

During the late 1960s, after Medicaid and other federal programs were implemented, infant mortality (primarily postneonatal mortality) declined substantially (5). From 1970 to 1979, neonatal mortality plummeted 41%, because of technologic advances in neonatal medicine and in the regionalization of perinatal services.
So the decrease was largely attributed to the improved technology of premie support, as well as better access in prenatal care. But did immunization played a role? I'll focus on three deadly diseases: smallpox, diphtheria, and measles. Smallpox vaccines have a long history, and President Madison signed ‘An Act to Encourage Vaccination’ in 1813, and the last cases of indigenous, naturally occurring smallpox in USA occurred in 1949. Diphtheria toxoid, in the form of DTP, was available in the USA in the 1940s, yet the disease was already on the wane before the vaccine became available:


Reported-diphtheria-cases-United-States-1920-1998.png
(A Golaz, I R. Hardy, et al. Epidemic Diphtheria in the Newly Independent States of the Former Soviet Union: Implications for Diphtheria Control in the United States. J Infectious Diseases, March 2000. DOI: 10.1086/315569)

Measles vaccines were not available before 1963. While it had made night-and-day difference in prevalence of the disease in the USA, it hardly did anything to measles mortality in the country, which is extremely low at any rate (I admit I'm sort of surprised because the situation is completely different in the Third World, where malnutrition and coinfections makes measles a far more deadly disease, even today).
Reported-diphtheria-cases-United-States-1920-1998.png
(Source)

So here are three diseases, three different situations, yet none showed conclusively that vaccines caused a big decrease in infant mortality in the USA during the 1950-60s.
 
I'm pretty sure AOC was thinking that the people invading the Capitol were going to kill EVERYONE (with a D after their name) in Congress, and that this would cause Martial Law to be invoked/applied by Drumpf once all the democrats were out of the way.

Which is stupid and ridiculous.
That was never going to happen.

The vast majority of people there went to hear Trump speak and, at worst, took a look around Congress. There were never enough people with weapons there to carry out a full-scale military coup even if they'd wanted to.
Is it just me or is anyone else getting reminded of the hatcheries in Brave New World?
 
So it was ironic that radfems like Shulamith Firestone thought artificial wombs would eliminate a major source of oppression to women and would truly make women on par with men.


You want more irony? Communism had from the get go saw women chiefly as producers of new generations of proletariats (and also a reserve labor force).

Guess whose hand it is?
View attachment 2195864
View attachment 2195868

Ma, no hands!
View attachment 2195865
View attachment 2195867

Mosh pits.
View attachment 2195873

Chris likes P!nk too!
View attachment 2195878

There is a 14-minute Third Person video in which (I think) he mostly talks about his house.
Chris Chipman at a hardcore show. Yeah, that happened.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back