- Joined
- Sep 17, 2018
Not liking Kafka is fair. They're not the easiest of reads and my suspicion is that a lot is lost in translationRichard Dawkins. I don't like Kafka and I incline to agree with him.
View attachment 2236490
The work isn't SF, it isn't allegory, it's proto-surrealism. Looking for one definitive interpretation is along the same lines as looking for a hidden photorealistic portrait in any given modern art style of painting. Dawkins gets a pass for missing this because you don't go to scientists for fine art reviews.
Bob, on the other had, is in art review circles and can only muster up "some badass stuff happened!" Fuckin idiot probably thinks it's an ideal candidate to adapt to film if only Bob had a chance to tighten up the script.
Also, Bob thinking he's not only on first name terms with Dawkins, but that he's free to refer to him in the diminutive. Clearly the lindsaying didn't deflate his ego and I have to wonder what possibly could