Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
This fat faggot is so ignorant with foreign cultures.

- Only ONE state in Mexico's 32 states and federal district celebrates Cinco de Mayo; Puebla. Everyone else doesn't care.

- Cinco de Mayo is not Mexico's independence day, retard. It celebrates the battle of Puebla. Mexico's independence day is September 16, but the rallying cry in remembrance of the original cry that started the war for their independence is celebrated the eve of the 15th.

- May 5th is so irrelevant compared to 9/16 it's not even a federal holiday or a guarantee of a day off even in the state that celebrates it.

But Bob, much like most liberals, think most Mexicans love May 5 and eat guac, tacos, and sleep beside a cactus. Fucking loser.
You like how Bob changed his ethnicity again just to pretend he might be the slightest bit not-white? Also I'm pretty sure the French thing is another thing he changed, probably so he can give excuses for pretending to watch the French porn he pretends are real movies.

And yeah, of course Bob would cheer for a holiday that only existed due to a small community of Mexicans from Puebla celebrating it in CA, and then a fuckload of beer companies marketed the fuck out of it to make an artificial holiday. Only a stupid alkie retard would shill for the corporate holiday where he can drink his PBR with pride than know the actual independence day.

Bet he'd chimp if he knew that Mexico much prefers their religious festivities despite their governments efforts than anything else.
 
06-19-21 wtf I love the CIA now.PNG
What I think's worth noting is that I hang out with quite a few guys who are theocrats in the literal sense and are patiently waiting for the ”Reign of Mary”, which will establish a traditionalist Catholic state and sweep away anyone who doesn't pray in Latin and use the 1955 Missal. In short, they're a bit like Moviebob in the sense that Moviebob sits around waiting for the Superyah Fyoocha, which will sweep away anyone who doesn't prostrate himself before the magnificent climate altar dedicated to God-Empress Kamala.

The main difference is that while those trads might hold views lots of people would consider extreme, they don't call for violence or treat people in the way Moviebob treats his enemies. True, they do joke about the Crusades a lot (in the same way I do, to be fair) but you don't see them on Twitter calling for ”Protestant scum” to be killed - in fact, I've rarely seen them describe anyone in the way Moviebob describes Republicans, and unlike him they've never called for terrorist attacks in order to bring about their prefered form of government. I've waffled a lot so I'll get to the point; for all Blob's hatred of Catholics, it's telling that our ”extremists” are far more tolerant than his ”forward-thinking, progressive-liberalism”.
 
Ah, Archie comics. So quaint they're almost refreshing these days. Letterman shirts, old jalopies, a crown made out of a hat.... Parodies of Star Trek, The Man from UNCLE, Superman.... Almost makes me want to pick one up and relive the innoce-(Sees Afterlife with Archie.)

Fuck.


Step 1: Band together to try gain attention.
Step 2: Gain attention.
Step 3: Get mad at attention.


Ah, yes, that great thinker of the age, Steven Colbert. But to stop the Bob show for a moment, that bluecheck at the top. Saying CRT isn't real but it's still normal and it's also not enough. And following it with "I'm a very astute liberal." These people are so damn hard to parody because they invariably say things that sound like parody.
Michael Tracey was being very sarcastic. He was mocking the left wing waterheads who sincerely claim that CRT doesn't exist.

Bob having nought but a void between his ears is far too stupid to pick up on sarcasm though.
 
It's like trying to do an entire show based around Barney Gumble. Barney's a fun character, but there's really only two jokes you can make: He gets drunk and does something stupid or he gets sober which is funny because he's supposed to be a drunk.

This is the problem with modern entertainment.

Devoid of the ability to write, the "writers" cannot tell stories, we are reduced to watching only character gags, belabored "running" gags (anything random three times in a row is funny!) or laughing about huffed farts and shit pants since everyone "gets" that joke!

And those are good for a laugh IN a story, but can't BE the whole story...

When they try to be the story, you get these paper-thin facsimiles of people telling unfunny "jokes" in stilted robotic dialogue that sounds like it was spat out by a machine-learning program because at this point, it probably was.
 
Last edited:
Bob openly believes that information manipulation from unelected officials is actually a good thing, as long as it happens to people Bob doesn't like.
View attachment 2275824
full Greenwald thread
pdf of the hearing for Operation Mockingbird
for a tl;dr of the op I'll point you to a segment of the wikipedia article about it with it's sources.
View attachment 2275833
View attachment 2275834
This and major news organizations constantly bringing on former and active members of intelligence agencies pushes me further to believe that it is 100% alive and well.
I would like to juxtapose this with something that he both liked and retweeted the day prior.
View attachment 2275842
It would never happen to him. Never. Now remember #TransWomenAreWomen, #TransMenAreMen and anyone who thinks differently is a bigot and must be punished.
Does Ujamesm1978 even understand what underlining as a way to show the importance of words means? I thought first there was some "secret" message hidden with the underlines, then without them, and now I am lost. You underlined half your stupid statement. You gave more strength to so many words that it means nothing.
 
This is the problem with modern entertainment.

Devoid of the ability to write, the "writers" cannot tell stories, we are reduced to watching only character gags.

And those are good for a laugh IN a story, but can't BE the whole story...

When they try to be the story, you get these paper-thin facsimiles of people telling unfunny "jokes" in stilted robotic dialogue that sounds like it was spat out by a machine-learning program because at this point, it probably was.
I can think of no better example of this than Ghostbusters 2016 vs the original.

One was a tightly scripted, story-driven experience which benefited from a talented cast with fantastic chemistry who all brought something unique to the table. The other was Melissa McCarthy Comedy Feature No.2,587 and existed only as a vehicle for the actors to huff farts and practise their improv for 90 minutes, when they weren't just shitting all over the franchise they were cynically cashing in on.

And look where that got them: The original Ghostbusters continues to be a beloved classic nearly 40 years later, while most people have already forgotten about the 2016 movie and Sony are rebooting the franchise for a second time in less than a decade.
 
I can think of no better example of this than Ghostbusters 2016 vs the original.

One was a tightly scripted, story-driven experience which benefited from a talented cast with fantastic chemistry who all brought something unique to the table. The other was Melissa McCarthy Comedy Feature No.2,587 and existed only as a vehicle for the actors to huff farts and practise their improv for 90 minutes, when they weren't just shitting all over the franchise they were cynically cashing in on.

And look where that got them: The original Ghostbusters continues to be a beloved classic nearly 40 years later, while most people have already forgotten about the 2016 movie and Sony are rebooting the franchise for a second time in less than a decade.

How you say something can make a joke out of dialogue that, on paper, isn't funny.

Or kill stuff that is funny.

I was thinking of GB16 as the penultimate example too: everyone talks like they're a sedated or autistic, I've heard people have more conviction in their words talking to pets who can't even understand them.
 
Moviebobert said:
Reality has a liberal bias.
Ah yes, because muh human rights, trannies, corporate whoring, and so much more are all things found in nature and the natural order of things.
Just look at how all the remaining indigenous tribes of the world are all LGBTQIA and big on pronouns, human rights, welcoming outsiders, and diddling kids.

And look how science just strives off liberal values, not like those conservitard/protestant values like dedication, discipline, conviction, perseverance, patience, and sacrifice.
No sir, Marie Curie and Einstein all made their discoveries on the values of empathy towards degeneracy and consooming.
And who could forget when the Wright brothers made the first flight by merit of screaming that niggers matter and screaming that their first tries failed because of White oppression.
 
What I think's worth noting is that I hang out with quite a few guys who are theocrats in the literal sense and are patiently waiting for the ”Reign of Mary”, which will establish a traditionalist Catholic state and sweep away anyone who doesn't pray in Latin and use the 1955 Missal. In short, they're a bit like Moviebob in the sense that Moviebob sits around waiting for the Superyah Fyoocha, which will sweep away anyone who doesn't prostrate himself before the magnificent climate altar dedicated to God-Empress Kamala.

The main difference is that while those trads might hold views lots of people would consider extreme, they don't call for violence or treat people in the way Moviebob treats his enemies. True, they do joke about the Crusades a lot (in the same way I do, to be fair) but you don't see them on Twitter calling for ”Protestant scum” to be killed - in fact, I've rarely seen them describe anyone in the way Moviebob describes Republicans, and unlike him they've never called for terrorist attacks in order to bring about their prefered form of government. I've waffled a lot so I'll get to the point; for all Blob's hatred of Catholics, it's telling that our ”extremists” are far more tolerant than his ”forward-thinking, progressive-liberalism”.
You sweet, innocent summer child...

Mark P Shea.

The catholic moviebob.
 
And look how science just strives off liberal values, not like those conservitard/protestant values like dedication, discipline, conviction, perseverance, patience, and sacrifice.
Reminds me of atheist USI, of which Bob is a prime example, where they assume that simply not believing in a God automatically makes them smarter than anyone who does.

Curious then, that so many doctors are Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh...all men of faith and all performing one of the most rigorously qualified jobs on the planet, but because they believe in God that makes them dumber than the atheist who spends all his time farming karma on Reddit, when he isn't working the part-time shift his mom made him get at Burger King.
 
Found this on Bob's ED page. Feel free to gimme clocks. View attachment 2276267
a few days ago at the wall of marts, I saw a kid who was clearly autist, wearing red overalls over blue shirt like mario and wearing a legit Mario cap. Think the kid was anywhere between 6-8 (hard to tell exactly cuz kid seemed tall for his age), but he was still less autistic than bob in any mario costume.
 
You sweet, innocent summer child...

Mark P Shea.

The catholic moviebob.
Today we can apparently learn that traditionalist Catholics are classical liberals that want to bring back chattel slavery.

If I have the free time I'll dissect that essay when I get back from Mass tomorrow.
Mark Shea takes the fallacy of "everything else is acceptable as long as a Catholic opposes abortion" and applies the opposite fallacy: "abortion doesn't matter at all because muh seamless garment and muh social teaching".
 
Mark Shea takes the fallacy of "everything else is acceptable as long as a Catholic opposes abortion" and applies the opposite fallacy: "abortion doesn't matter at all because muh seamless garment and muh social teaching".
I hate the ”seamless garment” argument with a passion because it implies several absurd things, namely;
• killing an innocent baby or an innocent grandmother is morally equivalent to killing a mass murderer,
• St Thomas Aquinas, as well as pretty much every Pope before Francis, were wrong when they declared the death penalty to be legitimate,
• St Augustine of Hippo was wrong when he proposed just war theory,
• the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Pope Benedict XVI (then Cardinal Ratzinger) were wrong when they said that abortion and capital punishment were not comparable, and thus that,
• Pope Francis' non-dogmatic statements in Fratelli Tutti concerning the death penalty and war magically overrule two thousand years of Sacred Tradition.
• Pope Benedict XVI's statement that it is not licit for a Catholic to disagree with the Holy Father on abortion doesn't actually count.
• a position which is supported by Fr James Martin, SJ and generally speaking has no supporters outside of the progressivist wing of the Church has more claim to be based in Tradition than a position held by the Church for over a thousand years.
 
I hate the ”seamless garment” argument with a passion because it implies several absurd things, namely;
• killing an innocent baby or an innocent grandmother is morally equivalent to killing a mass murderer,
• St Thomas Aquinas, as well as pretty much every Pope before Francis, were wrong when they declared the death penalty to be legitimate,
• St Augustine of Hippo was wrong when he proposed just war theory,
• the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Pope Benedict XVI (then Cardinal Ratzinger) were wrong when they said that abortion and capital punishment were not comparable, and thus that,
• Pope Francis' non-dogmatic statements in Fratelli Tutti concerning the death penalty and war magically overrule two thousand years of Sacred Tradition.
• Pope Benedict XVI's statement that it is not licit for a Catholic to disagree with the Holy Father on abortion doesn't actually count.
• a position which is supported by Fr James Martin, SJ and generally speaking has no supporters outside of the progressivist wing of the Church has more claim to be based in Tradition than a position held by the Church for over a thousand years.
It's astounding to see Mark Shea and James Martin attempt to retcon every globohomo pet project as Catholic Social Teaching™️, to the point of simping for people who are actively hostile to Christianity. It's the upshot of interpreting "love thy neighbor and turn the other cheek" as "be a doormat and and a passive enabler of evil".
 
Reminds me of atheist USI, of which Bob is a prime example, where they assume that simply not believing in a God automatically makes them smarter than anyone who does.

Curious then, that so many doctors are Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh...all men of faith and all performing one of the most rigorously qualified jobs on the planet, but because they believe in God that makes them dumber than the atheist who spends all his time farming karma on Reddit, when he isn't working the part-time shift his mom made him get at Burger King.
The amount of religious physicists is immense too, and they tend to fall into one of two camps: devoutly Abrahamic (Jews and Christians who are the most common) and freaky New Agers/Satanists (JPL used to be staffed by a ton of these). Either way, both sides believe in a supernatural groundwork to the universe because of their field, and the tiny glimpse they have of the cosmos's inner workings.

The fact of the matter is, regardless of what religious sentiment people get into, observation of the intricacies of nature often produces religiosity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back