Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[Troonologist PhD]

To the question of whether Lee at al were traitors, here's a simple acid test: given that they lost the war, were they hanged for treason? No? OK, shut up then. It's not like people had great compunction about executing traitors in the 19th century, and given the Confederacy's unconditional surrender, it would have been child's play to pull off. OFC, that never happened because the entire "reunification" narrative that the Union used to legitimize it's position was that the war was a tragic misunderstanding within a nation- a "brother war" if you will- and that the South was being re-integrated, not conquered. Whether or not this is bullshit is an exercise I leave to the reader, but the point is that we've gone over a century and a half without considering the Confederates to be Benedict Arnold-tier traitors, and trying to retcon them into that now is complete bullshit, especially in light of the actions of the people who were actually there.

Radical leftists/whatever Blob is accusing others of treachery is the pot calling the kettle black.

 

[Krokodil Overdose]

Radical leftists/whatever Blob is accusing others of treachery is the pot calling the kettle black.

I wish it was that simple. They're constantly bitching about colonialism, conquests, assimilation, and on and on and on with a toddler-like screech about how "it's not FAIR!" right up until you mention the Confederacy, or the Islamic conquests in Europe, at which point they suddenly decide that they're Sulla and "vae victis, the winners write the history books, no statues for losers sweaty" is the order of the day. These people have literally no principles, and will adopt whatever position at whatever time in order to rationalize their rats' nest of unprincipled exceptions to unexceptional principles.

 

[Troonologist PhD]

I wish it was that simple. They're constantly bitching about colonialism, conquests, assimilation, and on and on and on with a toddler-like screech about how "it's not FAIR!" right up until you mention the Confederacy, or the Islamic conquests in Europe, at which point they suddenly decide that they're Sulla and "vae victis, the winners write the history books, no statues for losers sweaty" is the order of the day. These people have literally no principles, and will adopt whatever position at whatever time in order to rationalize their rats' nest of unprincipled exceptions to unexceptional principles.

Oh I'm very aware they have no morals and ethics.* Imo it still doesn't make them any less hypocritical.

*They only have one principle: the Revolution/holy war comes before all things. It's another thing they have in common with Islam.

 

[Meat Target]

The obsession with the confederacy is autistic and retarded. You weren’t alive, you weren’t on either side. You didn’t win or lose shit. Retards like Bob use it as a smokescreen to deflect from the violent, racist past and present of the North. It’s easy to claim slavery as a moral wrong but it’s another to address the lynchings, segregation, and general racism that still goes on in your backyard.

Hell, in my case, at least one half of my ancestors weren't even here when it went down.

Yet, I am still directly and personally responsible for slavery, Jim Crow, and the kafkatrap of "institutional racism", because something something hummuna hummuna people who kinda looked like me that died 200 years ago owned slaves.

 

[Quixotic Man]

One of my direct ancestors was a Union civil war general, and the rest of my ancestors where northern dirt farmers too poor to own anyone. But I recognize that by not engaging in slavery, or actively fighting against it, they were supporting white supremacy. Therefore every time I am at the grocery store, I throw dollar bills at the fat black women in Rascal Scooters there.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

One of my direct ancestors was a Union civil war general, and the rest of my ancestors where northern dirt farmers too poor to own anyone. But I recognize that by not engaging in slavery, or actively fighting against it, they were supporting white supremacy. Therefore every time I am at the grocery store, I throw dollar bills at the fat black women in Rascal Scooters there.

Why are you only throwing dollar bills at cis-black women? Why not throw $20 bills at disabled latinx black transwomxn, perhaps you aren't doing enough to stop white supremacy?

(wrong cow but IDC)

 

[LordofCringe7206]

Bob fails to realise that history is invariably written by the victors, and that if the Rebels had won at Gettysburg and the Chipmans had become Southern hillbillies instead of New England hillbillies, he'd be sat on whatever the Confederate version of Twitter is calling Southern unionists traitors, defending slavery while being unable to buy any "young Negro manservants" to clean out his Charlottesville basement apartment, and lusting after Adelaide O'Higgins-Custer, that purty Southern belle who talks so much about the need to redistribute cotton plantations.

You don't even really have to imagine this since he already flip-flops almost everyday on some random subject matter. How many times in recent years has he flip-flopped on "ethics in gaming journalism" despite him considering it such an important position that he torpedoed his career and reputation over it?

 

[Arthur Morgan]

Why are you only throwing dollar bills at cis-black women? Why not throw $20 bills at disabled latinx black transwomxn, perhaps you aren't doing enough to stop white supremacy?
View attachment 2377392

(wrong cow but IDC)

Hey, they're both condescending douche bags who have too high an opinion of themselves and their talents while assuming everyone else is wrong, which is why their careers are heading downward. I call the comparison fair.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

Hey, they're both condescending douche bags who have too high an opinion of themselves and their talents while assuming everyone else is wrong, which is why their careers are heading downward. I call the comparison fair.

TBF that definition fits a good number of lolcows though

 

[Pokemonquistador2]

Hell, in my case, at least one half of my ancestors weren't even here when it went down.

Yet, I am still directly and personally responsible for slavery, Jim Crow, and the kafkatrap of "institutional racism", because something something hummuna hummuna people who kinda looked like me that died 200 years ago owned slaves.

They'll look you in the eye and say that, being a white man, even one whose ancestors were not responsible for slavery, you still have privilege and get to benefit from the System, which was built solely off of the backs of black slaves, who generated most of the wealth for it. If you try to turn around and point out that the cotton industry had only a modest effect on the growth of the American economy and was actually detrimental to the South, they'll just turn around and call you a racist because the only history they've read was from the 1619 Project.

 

[TopTierHealer]

They'll look you in the eye and say that, being a white man, even one whose ancestors were not responsible for slavery, you still have privilege and get to benefit from the System, which was built solely off of the backs of black slaves, who generated most of the wealth for it. If you try to turn around and point out that the cotton industry had only a modest effect on the growth of the American economy and was actually detrimental to the South, they'll just turn around and call you a racist because the only history they've read was from the 1619 Project.

Not a Burguerstani, can you fill me in on the 1619 project? /his/ unironically supports CRT explaining how the negro in america has always been a second class citizen through no fault of his own and the US has to coddle them forever since they brought them there in the first place and can't re-integrate them in African society. Like a relative with Dementia that can never die.

P.S. Is the 1619 project something that can be countered by asking the question, "Who owned the ships?" ?

 

[Privilege Power Hour]

Not a Burguerstani, can you fill me in on the 1619 project? /his/ unironically supports CRT explaining how the negro in america has always been a second class citizen through no fault of his own and the US has to coddle them forever since they brought them there in the first place and can't re-integrate them in African society. Like a relative with Dementia that can never die.

P.S. Is the 1619 project something that can be countered by asking the question, "Who owned the ships?" ?

The 1619 Project is a bit of a rabbit hole since it is, in a lot of ways, ground zero for the current controversy over CRT. To make a long story short, it was a massive piece ran in the New York Times that posited 1619 was the real founding year for America rather than 1776 as it was the first year slaves were traded in the New World. From there, everything about the US has been about keeping black people slaves, and when we couldn't keep them literal slaves and had the Civil War, it means we kept them pretty much slaves in all but name only. This includes claims that the Revolution wasn't fought over any real ideals but rather because Britain looked like it might abolish slavery sometime in the near future and the founders couldn't bear to give up their slaves. Even left wing historians were calling out how poorly researched the whole thing was and clearly contradictory to anything we know about American history.

Fast forward some time later and the whole country was engulfed in controversy over it. The most prestigious paper in the country (and maybe the entire world) had published a huge thing positing, against all historical consensus of any kind, that our country's entire reason to exist is to be racist against black people. A lot of normies for the first time found out about CRT and its claims about systemic racism and "whiteness." The author has since made herself into a martyr because people had the gall to criticize her and tried to play language games about "oh, you know, it's just a theory about America's history" and other deflections from having to rigorously defend her project from basic historical criticism. Somebody who followed it closer could probably give a more detailed account of the whole thing, but that's the gist of it.

Also, no, you can't ask who owned the boats because that's not the point. The purpose is to ignore any fact of history and instead cast everything as a metaphysical struggle against the racism emanating from the souls of white people, who have engineered all the world to be racist. If whites don't own the boats, the people who do are only trading slaves because of the whiteness in their hearts.

 

[Jason Knight]

The 1619 Project is a bit of a rabbit hole since it is, in a lot of ways, ground zero for the current controversy over CRT. To make a long story short, it was a massive piece ran in the New York Times that posited 1619 was the real founding year for America rather than 1776 as it was the first year slaves were traded in the New World. From there, everything about the US has been about keeping black people slaves, and when we couldn't keep them literal slaves and had the Civil War, it means we kept them pretty much slaves in all but name only. This includes claims that the Revolution wasn't fought over any real ideals but rather because Britain looked like it might abolish slavery sometime in the near future and the founders couldn't bear to give up their slaves. Even left wing historians were calling out how poorly researched the whole thing was and clearly contradictory to anything we know about American history.

Fast forward some time later and the whole country was engulfed in controversy over it. The most prestigious paper in the country (and maybe the entire world) had published a huge thing positing, against all historical consensus of any kind, that our country's entire reason to exist is to be racist against black people. A lot of normies for the first time found out about CRT and its claims about systemic racism and "whiteness." The author has since made herself into a martyr because people had the gall to criticize her and tried to play language games about "oh, you know, it's just a theory about America's history" and other deflections from having to rigorously defend her project from basic historical criticism. Somebody who followed it closer could probably give a more detailed account of the whole thing, but that's the gist of it.

Also, no, you can't ask who owned the boats because that's not the point. The purpose is to ignore any fact of history and instead cast everything as a metaphysical struggle against the racism emanating from the souls of white people, who have engineered all the world to be racist. If whites don't own the boats, the people who do are only trading slaves because of the whiteness in their hearts.

In other words, it all boils down to anti-White racism, nothing more, nothing less. In my opinion, calling it anything different obfuscates the cause of the struggle. The controversy is over whether White people deserve to be hated and discriminated against, and it should not be hard for people to decide which side they're on.

 

[Positron]

Chris is no longer going to see Green Day and his favorite ska band.

---

The covid virus is "easily manageable with vaccines" (who ever said that?); it is the MAGA ghouls who are intractable.
(So how would Bobby explain the rising case numbers in countries with easily available vaccines, few cancerous white people, and presumably no MAGA ghouls, such as Japan and South Korea?)

Let me guess Bobby's reply: Trumpsters are not human; they don't deserve "human rights"





Capitol Rioters:

What seems to be the problem? I want a Camp Auschwitz T-shirt too.

---

Bobby pretends to care for the slaves under Jeff Bezos. Given his attitude to manual workers and automation, he can only be thinking about AOC as he typed this.
Also note what a jerk he is.

So Bobby, as of 25 July 2021, thinks Bezos should have waited for automation before he started his enterprise. It is, after all, only one generation before the world get rid of human package deliverers.


Indeed there is no problem choosing the blue button. Bezos and Bobby should stop caring whatever every "major news outlet" says.

But Bobby loses my sympathy in his next post.

I have no idea what this woman is the ambassador of. This is her Twitter if that helps.

Understanding politics through pop culture:

(Archive of NYT article)

---

There is a reason why Bobby cannot dine at the same table with the SJW kool kids: he keeps playing dumb and missing the point.

When your Blacker and better talks about rape culture and nerds, you don't interject with your observation on SFX. BTW why would our feminist watch such a DVD and delve into the commentary track? For research I suppose?


Bobby's review, a 7-minute watch.

For some reason Bobby thinks we should care about niggers in Japan:





Cool story bro.

GI Joe Toys:



(Kawasaki commercial)

How would you make Christianity palatable to the consoomer generation? Add kitsch!




Abject idolatry!

Some no-name actor troons out. He might have a good stylist, but the moment he open his mouth, he gives the game away:


Crossover with James Radich, Scientific Officer of the Rat Kings.



Not all health care workers are pro-abortion, not even close.


This is a perfect argument to lock up autistics in cages and charge people admission fee to watch them chimp out and perhaps stab each other in the face.

Dob Chipman:

 

[Quixotic Man]

Gag manga aren't cannon anymore than Captain N is. Bob should know this after he was traumatized by Mario not being from Brooklyn.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

But Bobby loses my sympathy in his next post.

I have no idea what this woman is the ambassador of. This is her Twitter if that helps.

"But I WILL touch my star one day"

Fuggin LMAO

I do not where he got this Buck Rogers, Spaceman Spiff infatuation from. He talks far more about Transformers then he does about Star Trek. Delusions of grandeur must be a defect in the y chromosome of Chipmans. Bob thinks he can get to the moon and Chris thinks he can provide for his family while going hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt just by doing enough podcasts.

 

[Boston Brand]

The Confederacy crap is interesting because yes, the Lost Cause of the Confederacy is a literal cancer on American history.... and the wave of CRT/1619 is literally using the same playbook for the same reasons, cooking up historical excuses for thier politics.

Meanwhile on the ground, maybe the biggest mistake looking at the American Civil War is boiling it down to North vs South was literally pushed by the Lost Cause... reality is it was one group of Southerners versus everyone else, including the rest of the South. 1 in 3 Southerners who fought did so for the USA, and large chunks of nearly every Southern state were fighting against the sessionists.

But then our Bahston big head here doesn't get to make fun of Southerners.

As for 1619, it's the left wing equivalent of The 5000 Year Leap, political excuses with a thin veneer of often false history.

Hell, the central tennant is false... the first slaves in the Americas arrived in 1526, damn nearly a century before Englishmen even reached these shores.

That's before touching on that the West African slave trade was centuries old by this point. Mansa Musa, the richest man in history, largely got there by conquiring enough land he monopolized it, in addition to all the gold and salt he had mined by slaves. The Mali and the Songhai were LITERAL empires built on slavery.

Try telling that to the WE WUZ KANGS crowd.

 

[Oh Long Johnson]

"I was at the gym."

 

[TopTierHealer]

The 1619 Project is a bit of a rabbit hole since it is, in a lot of ways, ground zero for the current controversy over CRT. To make a long story short, it was a massive piece ran in the New York Times that posited 1619 was the real founding year for America rather than 1776 as it was the first year slaves were traded in the New World. From there, everything about the US has been about keeping black people slaves, and when we couldn't keep them literal slaves and had the Civil War, it means we kept them pretty much slaves in all but name only. This includes claims that the Revolution wasn't fought over any real ideals but rather because Britain looked like it might abolish slavery sometime in the near future and the founders couldn't bear to give up their slaves. Even left wing historians were calling out how poorly researched the whole thing was and clearly contradictory to anything we know about American history.

Fast forward some time later and the whole country was engulfed in controversy over it. The most prestigious paper in the country (and maybe the entire world) had published a huge thing positing, against all historical consensus of any kind, that our country's entire reason to exist is to be racist against black people. A lot of normies for the first time found out about CRT and its claims about systemic racism and "whiteness." The author has since made herself into a martyr because people had the gall to criticize her and tried to play language games about "oh, you know, it's just a theory about America's history" and other deflections from having to rigorously defend her project from basic historical criticism. Somebody who followed it closer could probably give a more detailed account of the whole thing, but that's the gist of it.

Also, no, you can't ask who owned the boats because that's not the point. The purpose is to ignore any fact of history and instead cast everything as a metaphysical struggle against the racism emanating from the souls of white people, who have engineered all the world to be racist. If whites don't own the boats, the people who do are only trading slaves because of the whiteness in their hearts.

Thank you very much for taking the time to explain this little piece of lunacy. Boy, the Humanities are fucked if this fanfiction is considered historiogprahy.
I know it sounds defeatist but I really want the Chineese to take over and start buning Harlem, Chicago, Los Angeles to the ground at the first sight of black nonsense. The Chineese masacre their own people like it's nothing, do you think they will care about "the struggle of black voices in the united states"?

 

[Woe-B-Gon (TM)]

The Chineese masacre their own people like it's nothing, do you think they will care about "the struggle of black voices in the united states"?

I can already hear the wailing "But we're Communists, just like you!"