Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Gay and lesbian people have existed throughout all of human history, and homosexual behavior including exclusive homosexuality has been observed in many animal species as well.
Same sex animals will have sex during rutting season, sure, but exclusive homosexuality has not been observed outside captivity. Also, rape has also been observed in animals.
Also, if you believe that anything short of heterosexual missionary-position sex in the dark once a fortnight is overly sexually permissive, why are you only targeting support for LGB people here, and not talking about the dangers of excessively permissive heterosexual sexuality? You claim to be against anything that isn't what you consider "normal," but you're singling out only one thing.
I am against excessively permissive sexuality of any kind, I'm against porn and hookup culture, I think dating apps are horrendous, I don't think a large number of partners is good for either men or women. I don't know why you assumed I would be in favour of those things at all to begin with, like yeah lol, they're bad. You can see me in other threads arguing with people that porn should be banned.
I already addressed that every group has freaks and bad actors in it, that doesn't mean the entire group is made up of freaks and bad actors. Since you're presumably a straight man I would warn you not to go down this road, because most of the absolute most degenerate, disgusting freaks who have ever inhabited this planet were/are straight men. Do you want me to start bringing up examples? Shall we advocate for straight men to lose their rights because of their history of sexual degeneracy and general filth? Somehow I don't think you want that.

Glass houses, big ol' rocks, my friend.
The risk per exposure when it comes to aids for unprotected receptive anal sex is 1 every 72 encounters. The risk per exposure for unprotected insertive anal sex is 1 every 902 exposures.

Square those numbers with the aids epidemic or "plague" as people during the crisis liked to call it and tell me what the "majority" of gay men are upto. Because if somehow a plague breaks out of something that requires you to have unprotected sex with 900 strangers to spread it once... well then.

Also worth noting that per capita gay men also win out in syphilis and a bunch of other STDs. Like yea, let's start throwing rocks, let's see what gets hit.

Also, your examples only concern gay men, and have nothing to do with lesbians, but you're using them to advocate for less tolerance and rights for all homosexual and bisexual people. Care to square that circle for me?
Men and women are interdependant, I think that is the basis for a healthy and happy society.

I don't think any paraphilia should be encouraged or accepted for any reason at all. I don't think even you will disagree that the slippery slope is in fact a slip and slide, because that's how we ended up with trannies taking over in the first place.
The tranny rights movement is a movement that exists because of male sexologists, autogynephiles, and other powerful fetishists with an agenda.
Right. And the politicial ideology that has been promoting and supporting them nonstop for 50 years is liberalism.
 
Same sex animals will have sex during rutting season, sure, but exclusive homosexuality has not been observed outside captivity.
Yes, it has. Even if it hadn't, again, exclusive homosexuality in human beings has been observed throughout all of human history. It's perfectly normal. And comparing healthy, happy relationships between two people who happen to be of the same sex to rape is actually abhorrent - I would say even deviant - behavior. Better check yourself before you have to advocate to remove your own rights for being a degen.

I am against excessively permissive sexuality of any kind
Yet you focus here on the evils of tolerance for homosexuality, not all the other myriad forms of sexual permissiveness that apply mostly or only to straight people. Hmmm. 🤔

Like yea, let's start throwing rocks, let's see what gets hit.
Bro... straight men rape women at literally epidemic levels. Depending on what source you use, one in every four or one in every five women will be the victim of rape in their lifetime, with 99% of those rapes being committed by heterosexual men. Straight men are the primary perpetrators of rape, sexual assault, sexual harassment, child molestation, animal rape, torture and murder. The vast majority of the most disgusting, depraved serial killers in the history of the world were straight men whose victims were, for virtually all of them, exclusively women, many of whom were subjected to sexual torture before being killed. Throughout history, sexual crimes have been committed by straight men against women, over and over and over and over. Yet there is no widespread social effort to curtail straight male sexuality, I wonder why?

I mean, maybe it's just me, but I feel like a group being prone to passing along STDs in a time when they were poorly understood is less of an issue than this group that literally rapes almost half of the women on the planet. But I guess that's just me?

If you're not a total hypocrite, please point to all of your posts advocating for heterosexual male sexuality to be considered forbidden and for any straight man who exhibits sexual thoughts or feelings to be shunned or even killed for it. If that's what you want for gay men because they have a high rate of STDs, surely you would want even worse for straight men such as yourself who have such a tendency to commit rape and other sex crimes! Right? Right?

Oh, wait, no, you're just a hypocrite desperately casting about for some way to "justify" your bigotry. How typical. How boring.

I don't think even you will disagree that the slippery slope is in fact a slip and slide, because that's how we ended up with trannies taking over in the first place.
I absolutely disagree. The power that the trans movement holds in society has nothing to do with public support for the LGB - they steal the language of that movement, but they aren't part of it or derivative of it. The trans movement holds the power that it does because it is a movement by and for heterosexual men. The majority of trannies are straight men and they hold the social position and power that straight men hold.

The majority of older trannies are old straight, white men who have been or currently are married to women. The vast majority of trans-identified males are heterosexual men who only engage in same-sex relationships ("t4t") out of desperation/inability to find a woman willing to put up with them. The entire focus of the trans rights movement is on the "rights" of trans-identified males to usurp, undermine and destroy the actual rights of actual women. You can also see it in the way that women's voices are considered far, far less important than those of trans-identified males, and indeed the way women are treated as disposable objects by the trans movement who should simply cease to exist if they aren't being of use to the men of the movement.

None of this has anything to do with gay people, or the movement for tolerance and acceptance of gay people. It has everything to do with the pervasive social idea that straight men's sexual desires must be accepted and pandered to at all times and in all places. Your problem shouldn't be with the gays if you want to go after the root cause of the trans movement's success, your problem should be with, once again, straight men and societal acceptance of straight male sexuality being shoved in everyone's faces 24/7/365.

EDIT: For the record, I don't believe men should be stoned or anything for exhibiting sexual behavior, because some men being freaks and monsters doesn't mean all men are freaks and monsters. I am using this suggestion as a rhetorical tool to point out how hypocritical it is to judge all gay people as deviants who should be subject to revulsion and harm for their sexuality because of a few freaks while not treating straight men the same way. Peace. ✌️
EDIT 2: math correction.
 
Last edited:
one in every four or one in every five women will be the victim of rape in their lifetime,
I'm gonna have to stop you right here, are you really going to use the "1 in 4 women" will be raped stat?

The one based on a single college campus that has been been debunked for literally more than 10 years? The one where the researchers literally told the subjects "no you were raped" even when the subjects literally said "no i wasn't."
I mean, maybe it's just me, but I feel like a group being prone to passing along STDs in a time when they were poorly understood
To pass this STD to 1 person you need to have sex with 1000 strangers. And this STD was a literal pandemic.

Does your back hurt from reaching this hard to try and justify the most depraved pandemic in the history of mankind?

Just to recap, a debunked poorly researched study in a college campus is definitive proof that in 1 in 4 women will get raped, but statistics from the CDC that say you need to have sex with 1000 strangers to spread aids to one of them, in combination with the fact that in the 80s we had an aids epidemic isn't proof of anything.

I have legitimately seen troon activists jump through less hoops to justify trans women being women than you have to justify gay men not being perverts.
 
Being gay or lesbian is literally normal. Gay and lesbian people have existed throughout all of human history, and homosexual behavior including exclusive homosexuality has been observed in many animal species as well.
Well... no. Something simply occurring doesn't mean it's normal, normalcy is about commonality and what is the observable default. People have been schizophrenic throughout all of human history too, that doesn't mean being insane is normal.

nor·mal
/ˈnôrm(ə)l/
adjective
1.
conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected.

If half the population on Earth were gay then sure you could argue it's normal, but in all of human history and even in the most liberal, accepting, free-lovin' societies it's never gone above, what, 5-8% of the population?

Homosexuality is literally, definitionally, abnormal for every species it occurs in, including humans. It happens, yes, but it's an anomaly.

You can say that being gay is fine, that's completely reasonable, but to claim that it's normal is simply incorrect going off the very definition of the term.
 
Last edited:
Well... no. Something simply occurring doesn't mean it's normal, normalcy is about commonality and what is the observable default. People have been schizophrenic throughout all of human history too, that doesn't mean being insane is normal.

nor·mal
/ˈnôrm(ə)l/
adjective
1.
conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected.

If half the population on Earth were gay then sure you could argue it's normal, but in all of human history and even in the most liberal, accepting, free-lovin' societies it's never gone above, what, 5-8% of the population?

Homosexuality is literally, definitionally, abnormal for every species it occurs in, including humans. It happens, yes, but it's an anomaly.

I was born with astigmatism that didn’t manifest until I was 22. Am I an anomaly.
 
If half the population on Earth were gay then sure you could argue it's normal, but in all of human history and even in the most liberal, accepting, free-lovin' societies it's never gone above, what, 5-8% of the population?
Rare =/= abnormal.

Anyway, this is getting OT, so allow me to pull things back to the subject by saying that I take any male celeb "speaking out" against JKR as a sign that they're a misogynist creep. It's a really transparent and cheap way to virtue signal that they're "one of the good ones" by bullying a woman who has been piled on by half of society. Nah, fuck that. I haven't ever been wrong, either - every single guy who virtue signals by going to the press and bravely saying "WIZARD BOOK WOMAN BAD" has in fact turned out to be a misogynistic creep. I'm just waiting to see how the dice roll on Pedro Pascal - though honestly pushing his trans-identified little brother on us and making us all look at his ugly attempts at womanface at every red carpet event is proof enough even without the JKR-bashing.
 
Rare =/= abnormal.
Screenshot 2025-06-30 214831.webp


abnormal - deviating from what is normal or usual
rare - not occurring very often


Anyway, this is getting OT, so allow me to pull things back to the subject by saying that I take any male celeb "speaking out" against JKR as a sign that they're a misogynist creep. It's a really transparent and cheap way to virtue signal that they're "one of the good ones" by bullying a woman who has been piled on by half of society. Nah, fuck that. I haven't ever been wrong, either - every single guy who virtue signals by going to the press and bravely saying "WIZARD BOOK WOMAN BAD" has in fact turned out to be a misogynistic creep. I'm just waiting to see how the dice roll on Pedro Pascal - though honestly pushing his trans-identified little brother on us and making us all look at his ugly attempts at womanface at every red carpet event is proof enough even without the JKR-bashing.
Okay yeah, agree. It's honestly just become a litmus test for how far gone you are, this woman genuinely breaks peoples brains by doing almost nothing and I cannot fathom why.

I'm glad Felton at least has stuck by her all this time.
 
Last edited:
A diamond is rare. Cutting your dick off is abnormal.
I mean if that's the framing in mind I would say that the topic at hand I.E. getting your back blown out by another dude is closer to the latter than it is the former.

Diamonds don't make you wear diapers at 40. :smug:
Anyone else got recommended this video?
Sure you can call the worldbuilding shallow, but they were never trying to be LOTR to begin with. Harry Potter makes it abundantly clear that sometimes things are more concerned with being fun experiences than they are with being well-rounded universes.
 
Could the retards using stats and numbers stop being such stupid faggots about how to read and interpret their data?

1 in 4 is not even close to 80%
and the cited chance to spread aids was 1 in 72, the "1 in 900" was to receive aids via sticking your dick in someone's arse.

Fight if you want, but don't be retarded with the stats you're bringing to the table (accurate or not, I don't give a fuck, just read them properly).
 
The day of Rowling's death will be the happiest day in these peoples lives, not just because of spite or because it will undo anything she did, but because they can FINALLY go back to publicly talking about the children's book they've been obsessing over in secret.

For a few minutes until they realize they're still absolutely worthless troon scum.
 
The day of Rowling's death will be the happiest day in these peoples lives, not just because of spite or because it will undo anything she did, but because they can FINALLY go back to publicly talking about the children's book they've been obsessing over in secret.
These people couldn't even keep themselves from consooming a stupid computer game and we all know they'll watch that new tv series in secret.
 
Back