Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Alan Rickman was good as ever but was really wrong for Snape. Yeah he was too old, but mostly it's that Rickman looks like a guy who has his shit together. Whereas book Snape was a greasy bug-eyed nerd with a massive, massive chip on his shoulder and incipient mental illness, and it's tragic he died before Twitter got going

Most creepy crushes on Snape are really just crushes on Alan Rickman, though I have seen a deeply weird fangirl or three who salivated for that greasy bug-eyed nerd.
 
David Tennant and his wife have a 13 year age gap, and she's the daughter of the fifth doctor actor. He's always been a massive doctor who nerd even before he became the doctor, I think they both are. There's one much older boy from a previous relationship that David adopted, but other that it's four girls and one boy (Wilfred) and the boy ids as non-binary. He's the middle child and also has very long hair like his sisters, so it might just be a 'girls have long hair' / middle child needs attention thing. He's named after the Doctor Who character Wilfred Mott, and also already followed his dad into acting, appearing on casualty aged 9.

On David's part I think it's just a fairly steady way to get attention and good boy points, pitting yourself against the evil terf queen, without having to do very much. Being a whovian who was a doctor became being married to the daughter of the fifth doctor became family man persona became this.
He's Scottish. Go figure.
 
I haven't read any pratchett at all but I thought those were alright as things go
If you do choose to read Discworld (worth it), borrow or buy second hand as his daughter is a troon lovin’ handmaiden.

Thread tax:

Troon comes in with the ineffective insult and gets blown out the water.
IMG_2661.jpeg
I had a scroll through his twitter but he’s not that interesting besides being a wannabe OF whore. Lots of people being based in his comments though.
 
"The front line". These people have no clue at all. Terrible over-actor, poncing around in a bubble.
His manic scenery chewing ruins everything he's in for me.

And I hated that Helena Bonham Carter played Bellatrix as just another corset-titties face-pulling Tim Burton character. Though she absolutely nailed the scene where she was Hermione lol.
 
If you do choose to read Discworld (worth it), borrow or buy second hand as his daughter is a troon lovin’ handmaiden.

Thread tax:

Troon comes in with the ineffective insult and gets blown out the water.
View attachment 5902384
I had a scroll through his twitter but he’s not that interesting besides being a wannabe OF whore. Lots of people being based in his comments though.
These fuckers make 4chan (and us) look like saints in comparison. Which we are, because we don't even try to pretend to be "tolerable, inclusive and progressive".

Once again-great actors in and of themsleves. Terribly used in that.
Honestly? You'd think the casting director was living in a time warp, almost every actor of the main adult cast was at LEAST 20 years too old.
If it was made around 1990 and not in up through the 2010s, fair do's.

And I mean, too old for thr parts cast, not like, off the boil as such.
But too old for the parts, and bad fits for thr parts. Really is amazing how you can misuse that many great people.


Whatshisname who was also in it.. The Scottish cunt, guy who played Dr Who. He was fucking embarrassing in it.
He's also been a creep as regards "trans kids" nowadays too.
Pandering to his tumblr pervs and opening his massive gob on shit he'd (you would hope only) ignorant on.
Arthur and Molly Weasley in the book don't look like their actors at all (and vice-versa). If anything, they look like parody characters (who are already parodies themselves).
 
His manic scenery chewing ruins everything he's in for me.

And I hated that Helena Bonham Carter played Bellatrix as just another corset-titties face-pulling Tim Burton character. Though she absolutely nailed the scene where she was Hermione lol.

My opinion is quite different. I loved Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix, but was frustrated that they barely gave her anything to do, after building her up as this terrifying, deranged, 'Blimey Harry, watch out for that loopy bitch!' lunatic for ages. She just turns up, kicks over some crockery, kills Sirius in the most quick, bloodless, boring way possible, then does nothing for the rest of the series, really.

I refer you to the clusterfuck reaction to the death of Chadwick Boseman.

Off topic, but was there a clusterfuck? I mean, besides a load of incels on YouTube being angry that they made Shuri the new Black Panther (something which, if they actually read the fucking comics, they'd know has happened on multiple occasions before) because it meant THE WEST MCU HAS FALLEN.

I just remember Black Panther 2 being a bit of a boring film. Is there some behind the scenes drama I don't know about?
 
Last edited:
@Morethanabitfoolish have you seen the animated channel 4 disc world things, again from about 2000?
I haven't read any pratchett at all but I thought those were alright as things go. Again, with no attachments. The animation looks dated now but it would have been interesting at the time. I was out of the country when it was on, ditto gormenghast.

Caught them both on YouTube for the first time... Well, in 2001 I saw some of Gormenghast- a couple episodes taped by my dads mate- then forgotten about, before the end. No love lost... Getting through the last few epsidoe on a YouTube watch recently was a slog.
I did, while you're right that the animation is dated it's also distinct and I think an attempt to capture the book covers. If memory serves the Monkey Island-esque Discworld games around the same time used a similar style.

I enjoyed them but my feelings are the same as the more recent live action adaptations. I prefer the books and feel they translate poorly to most other mediums. I don't think it's bad that they exist, like the Potter ones I think there was active effort involved in making them.
Also, most books that get turned into movies were better than average books while most movies are average. It's like how good movies rarely have sequels that are better, but mediocre movies often have better sequels.
I did think of some examples where I preferred the movies now. Jurassic Park and Jaws. With that said I thought some stuff in the books worked really well, like them arriving at the park and some of them picking up on the fact that the hotel bits have been fortified after initial construction to cope with dinosaur attacks.
Troon comes in with the ineffective insult and gets blown out the water.
JK entering her Libs of TikTok phase.
 
Last edited:
My opinion is quite different. I loved Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix, but was frustrated that they barely gave her anything to do, after building her up as this terrifying, deranged, 'Blimey Harry, watch out for that loopy bitch!' lunatic for ages. She just turns up, kicks over some crockery, kills Sirius in the most quick, bloodless, boring way possible, then does nothing for the rest of the series, really.
She also, somehow, managed to have a kid with whoever his name is.
 
how the parents in the flashbacks looked like 40 years old? The actor playing Harry Potter's dad was 43 at the time of the first film! And they were dressed/styled to look even older somehow.
Yes, and they did that even to the kids! Remember the epilogue, that shit was nightmare fuel. When you leave school in the UK, you immediately turn 50, apparently. Maybe that's why the hardcore fans were scared to grow up and became gender specials.

harry-potter-epilogue-feature-image.png
Thread tax:

Troon comes in with the ineffective insult and gets blown out the water.
View attachment 5902384
I had a scroll through his twitter but he’s not that interesting besides being a wannabe OF whore. Lots of people being based in his comments though.
Oh thanks, I somehow missed that horrible trans crime. It just keeps getting worse.
 
Why is trans bullshit such a spellbinding issue for these big-ish celebs? I don't remember many of them going this gung-ho continuously for other political issues.
There's a discussion between Peter Boghassian and Helen Joyce (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG9_lcln7FU), in which she says that the most aggressive defenders of this ideology will always be the parents of "trans" children, because they will never, never admit that they might have irreversibly fucked up their own children with these "treatments." She also talks about how it becomes incredibly difficult for people to openly criticize this ideology without risking their livelihoods. A journalist, for example, will uncover evidence about how harmful this is, and will want to publish it. One of their colleagues will take them aside and say, "look, you can't write that piece, the head of our organization has a trans kid, so keep a lid on it." So Tennant, with a heckin' valid genderspecial kid, will keep this shit up, like the rest of these parents. Besides, if he publicly admits he was wrong, with the fanbase he's cultivated, they'll devour him. By getting so vocally supportive of this, he's backed himself into a corner. JK, my ride or die, my #1, of course, has no need to worry about this, with her mountains of money
 
And I hated that Helena Bonham Carter played Bellatrix as just another corset-titties face-pulling Tim Burton character. Though she absolutely nailed the scene where she was Hermione lol.
She was just too pretty and young, Carter was fine for the scenes when they were in the court before crouch.

When she got out of prison during Harry's time she should have been visibly deteriorated.

They could have used Helena for tonk's mother although I don't even remember wether she was in the movie.
 
you can't just erase the entire reproductive period of the British life cycle
Damn. They can and they did.

Now we know the whole thing was part of the same globohomo troon push.

Jk probably stumbled into an eyes wide shut party at WB and swore to right thr wrong.

Completely irrelevant and may mark me as a sped, but for some reason before the movies came out Snape had green skin like the wicked witch in The Wizard of Oz to me.
I can vibe with that.
It starts off deceiving him as "sallow skinned" which is a kind of unusual word that sounds a bit like a shit version of yellow.

Kek my ma's is dyslexic and read the first book to my sister as "professor snap".
I read her the second one and she was like lol mams been calling him snap.

Every non posh brit pronounced hermione as "her-me-own" til the films came out tho so I'm not unscathed.
 
I can vibe with that.
It starts off deceiving him as "sallow skinned" which is a kind of unusual word that sounds a bit like a shit version of yellow.

Kek my ma's is dyslexic and read the first book to my sister as "professor snap".
I read her the second one and she was like lol mams been calling him snap.

Every non posh brit pronounced hermione as "her-me-own" til the films came out tho so I'm not unscathed.
Oh snap!
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: luigismanslave
Off topic, but was there a clusterfuck? I mean, besides a load of incels on YouTube being angry that they made Shuri the new Black Panther (something which, if they actually read the fucking comics, they'd know has happened on multiple occasions before) because it meant THE WEST MCU HAS FALLEN.

The decision to retire T'Challa, despite him being a fairly significant Marvel character and clearly being intended to be a big part of the MCU, was, I'd argue, the worst possible way to handle it, short of retiring the Black Panther mantle itself, which they obviously couldn't do. It's sad that Boseman died so young, but there was no reason not to find another actor to step into the shoes. They'd already recast Rhodie when Terrence Howard turned out to be a loon, and we're technically on Bruce Banner 3.0, so why not do so again? The solemnity around the whole thing was ridiculous, and frankly nauseating when you consider what a rapacious beast Disney is in reality.
 
Look I support JK Rowling's being catty to weirdos on Twitter, but she seems like maybe she's a little too into it.

Twitter turning people into lolcows doesn't know any class or gender and she seems to be increasingly mudslinging and responding to randos just for the sake of drama. If suddenly social perception turned against tranny shit she'd probably be bored as hell not getting to be queen TERF anymore.
You think?

Sans the trans-issue, she's just as much of an insufferably, terminally online leftist as those who she engage in Internet-slapfights with. She is only marginally better than her peers, which isn't very flattering, really.
She has become a bit of an edgelord shitposter, and why shouldn't she? Why should she care about what dumb people on the internet thinks of her? Internet popularity is the fakest and gayest redditor currency that ever existed. She should instead join the farms and sneed with the rest of us. Imagine the flashflood of pure troon seething.
Because it's wildly retarded, obviously.

For her to engage in the sort of catty, snarky way she does with her detractors on Twitter, of all places, is deeply embarrassing, and very much unbecoming of a grown woman. For an adult to waste time on something so profoundly childish belies her retarded base mentality. That her tweets might be correct when calling out trannies does not take away from the fact that she lurks around on Twitter in the first place, totally not malding herself.

It's grating to see her pontificate about how much she won't forgive those who criticized her for her stance on trans-issues before. Has this basic bitch ever considered apologizing for endorsing mass-immigration of dangeroues niggers of various hues, and ridiculing and slandering those who opposed it? Has she ever apologized for having been a cog in the massive wheel that allowed for the muslim rape gangs of Newcastle to do what they did to countless children? Of course she hasn't.

This dumb cunt has no moral highg round to begin with. Her only saving grace is her stance against trannies. That's it.
 
Back