Dramacow Ryulong / Michael Cohen - Fanatic Wikisperg, Anti-Gamergater and All Around Asshole

[Cynical]

Unlike Ryulong, I don't have the energy to shitpost 24/7, so here's some updates before I turn in:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1486622&oldid=1486621

Arisboch points out the fallacy inherent in calling all dissenters the enemy.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1486632&oldid=1486631

Because IT'S NOT TECHNICALLY ILLEGAL, Ryulong. Wanting it to be otherwise to utterly validate your views only proves your bias.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1486631&oldid=1486630

Hmm, didn't know Yahtzee was pro-Gamergate, though I was surprised Ryulong could manage an entire sentence without ad hominem.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1486630&oldid=1486629

The hypocrisy inherent in the statement "Gamergaters like to brigade and downvote shit that doesn't agree with the group think." is stunning.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1486628&oldid=1486627

Narky Sawtooth tells Ryulong to quit being an asshole to someone for citing German law, but not without a cheap backshot at Voat.

More crap now that I got some sleep:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laims&curid=170904&diff=1486679&oldid=1486663

If I rewire reality to suit my bias, maybe it will come true - Ryulong

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1486671&oldid=1486670

Voat is evil and you're evil for even citing objective fact about evil organizations.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1486644&oldid=1486639

Voat is evil and you're evil for even citing objective fact about evil organizations. - Prolouge

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1486672&oldid=1486671

Even David Gerard is taking the side of Ryulong, and I thought he was one of the saner RWians.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...rgate&curid=169712&diff=1486864&oldid=1486756

Dude, do you not know what memes are?

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1486859&oldid=1486857

Yeah, just keep telling yourself Gamergate is dying.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1486880&oldid=1486863

And given how Sarkessian has misrepresented, cherry picked, or outright lied before, we're supposed to take her information at face value without corroborating evidence?

More Ryulong narrative slanting:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...rgate&curid=169712&diff=1486915&oldid=1486882

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...rgate&curid=169712&diff=1486915&oldid=1486882

Looks like the weens have found Ryulong:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...otato&curid=159101&diff=1486998&oldid=1485083


https://slimgur.com/image/6O2
https://slimgur.com/image/6Oe
https://slimgur.com/image/6O4

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...atist&curid=169491&diff=1487009&oldid=1487008

Lol.

(Protection log); 03:33 . . FuzzyCatPotato (Talk | contribs) protected "User talk:Ryulong"‎ ‎[edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) ‎[move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) ‎(unto infinity; temp. has no rel. gain)

 

[Optimus Prime]

I see this guy.

I see that his life's work is all this bullshit about the Wiki pages he has moved heaven and earth to ensure are protected his way, often ignoring common fucking logic for cherrypicked examples that anybody with common sense would see are outliers.

All I can think of is this:

I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said—"Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert . . .Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed;
And on the pedestal these words appear:
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings; Ryulong, Dragon of Dragons;
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away."—

 

[Sweet and Savoury]

The best thing about Ryulong is that all this effort is futile. Sooner or later his precious pages will be changed. He can't stop it from happening forever.

Like fighting the tide bit, by bit you lose ground until you have nothing left.

In 5 years nothing of his will remain and it will drive him absolutely bonkers.

 

[Gensdupays]

The best thing about Ryulong is that all this effort is futile. Sooner or later his precious pages will be changed. He can't stop it from happening forever.

Like fighting the tide bit, by bit you lose ground until you have nothing left.

In 5 years nothing of his will remain and it will drive him absolutely bonkers.

He will find some Wiki small and obscure enough to boss around. He cannot help himself.

 

[Sweet and Savoury]

True enough but it will never be what he really wants.

He will never be on the SoCom or ArbCom of the true Wikipedia. He can't hobnob with the big names and his pages will go unprotected as his socks go away. His dream has always been to make it big in the Wikipedia power structure and now it will never, ever happen.

It will always eat into him, knowing that his hearts desire is forever beyond his reach.

And somehow, I'm ok with that.

 

[Cynical]

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laims&curid=170904&diff=1487092&oldid=1486914

Even though Arcane long left the discussion, Ryulong still has to come back and crucify the guy as an asshole in absentia.

Arcane - I'm a Gamergater, but I believe women should be judged on their merits and contributions to the gaming industry, just like men, and neither should use gender as an excuse for any failings or fault.

Ryulong - You're a Gamergater. All Gamergaters are evil, women hating assholes. Your claim of not being one is thus bullshit, you are full of bullshit, you woman hating bastard.

 

[Gensdupays]

I'm surprised an open GG supporter would be allowed there more than anything. I'm surprised I've actually seen people reference RationalWiki for anything too. I read it and feel the same cancer I get from reading Conservapedia.

 

[Cynical]

I'm surprised an open GG supporter would be allowed there more than anything. I'm surprised I've actually seen people reference RationalWiki for anything too. I read it and feel the same cancer I get from reading Conservapedia.

He left RW for good when he realized he wasn't welcome and that being a Gamergater meant they considered him Hitler:

http://gethn7.blogspot.com/2015/06/rational-wiki-im-so-glad-you-cast-me.html

Check the comments, he even told one of his commenters to not bother white knighting him on RW and to just leave them be.

 

[Gensdupays]

He left RW for good when he realized he wasn't welcome and that being a Gamergater meant they considered him Hitler:

http://gethn7.blogspot.com/2015/06/rational-wiki-im-so-glad-you-cast-me.html

Check the comments, he even told one of his commenters to not bother white knighting him on RW and to just leave them be.

I'd imagine Ryulong and his ilk already use him as an example more than just this once. Reading that post, I think RationalWiki itself might need a thread if it has gotten that bad.

 

[Massif]

I never understood how there can even be an argument about translating words which are clearly phonetic approximations of English words into the actual English word.
Yeah let's translate ドラゴン to doragon, that totally won't look stupid in English.
The weeaboo community really must be one of the deepest wellsprings of high grade spergery on the internet.

 

[A Random]

True enough but it will never be what he really wants.

He will never be on the So Com of the true Wikipedia. He can't hobnob with the big names and his pages will go unprotected as his socks go away.

It will always eat into him, knowing that his hearts desire is forever beyond his reach.

And somehow, I'm ok with that.

If nothing else, his lifespan will end at some point. And when it does, his ideals will no longer matter.

 

[Yellow Yam Scam]

I was under the assumption that he'd essentially been banned from RW...is that not true?

 

[Cynical]

I was under the assumption that he'd essentially been banned from RW...is that not true?

Nope. They had a vote, but refused to kick him out to deny his foes a victory, not to mention he had a lot of people who agreed with his insanity.

Also, they are more like SJWiki then they want to admit:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ryulong&curid=173041&diff=1487129&oldid=1487022

They've been modifying the Abuse and Edit filters quite a bit, apparently due to emailing by Ryulong, and given what their functions are, it's to prevent certain edits from being made.

Given all these changes coincide nicely with times Ryulong got trolled, he wants RW to be his new hugbox.

 

[Adamska]

I never understood how there can even be an argument about translating words which are clearly phonetic approximations of English words into the actual English word.
Yeah let's translate ドラゴン to doragon, that totally won't look stupid in English.
The weeaboo community really must be one of the deepest wellsprings of high grade spergery on the internet.

Yeah, they pretty much are massive failures who prefer broken and stilted translations over something that approximates English. Hell, some of them are so full of autism they prefer their dubs be full of Romaji (japanese words using roman alphabet) rather than words that people can easily understand.

As an aside, RationalWiki being full of the dumb like that makes sense; it formed because people kept sperging at Conservapedia.

 

[AnOminous]

He left RW for good when he realized he wasn't welcome and that being a Gamergater meant they considered him Hitler:

Say what you like about Wikipedia, there are always editors on every contested article from all points of view on the subject, whoever wins, even for particularly unpopular viewpoints.

Examples would include the articles on Scientology and on Israel.

I'm not saying they get the balance right all the time, and they often get it laughably wrong, but you don't see the kinds of pure shit you get on Conservapedia or the laughably misnamed RationalWiki.

 

[Massif]

Yeah, they pretty much are massive failures who prefer broken and stilted translations over something that approximates English. Hell, some of them are so full of autism they prefer their dubs be full of Romaji (japanese words using roman alphabet) rather than words that people can easily understand.

As an aside, RationalWiki being full of the dumb like that makes sense; it formed because people kept sperging at Conservapedia.

Real translators who translate actual literature would frown upon resorting to using words from the source language or having to explain things in footnotes unless completely necessary.
The whole art of a good translation is contained in NOT doing that but capturing the essence of the original text through creative and skilled use of language as well as literary understanding of the work, author and culture of origin.
It's just weebs letting their worship of Japan cloud their judgement as usual.

 

[Gensdupays]

Say what you like about Wikipedia, there are always editors on every contested article from all points of view on the subject, whoever wins, even for particularly unpopular viewpoints.

Examples would include the articles on Scientology and on Israel.

I'm not saying they get the balance right all the time, and they often get it laughably wrong, but you don't see the kinds of pure shit you get on Conservapedia or the laughably misnamed RationalWiki.

At least Conservapedia doesn't pretend to be the sole source of rational thinking.

 

[Cynical]

More oversighted weening:

https://slimgur.com/image/6qL

 

[chimpburgers]

At least Conservapedia doesn't pretend to be the sole source of rational thinking.

I still think both of them are on opposite extremes when it comes to bias and lunacy. Any site that takes so long to do something about someone clearly trying to manipulate articles to force their narrow views on a subject like Gamergate onto others for their own petty gain doesn't deserve respect from me. I see a conflict of interest from some of the pussies that post on RW. They want to protect their buddy at the expense of having the quality of the articles decline and the website's integrity go down the drain.

 

[AnOminous]

They want to protect their buddy at the expense of having the quality of the articles decline and the website's integrity go down the drain.

It really has about the same level of integrity as ED, without being openly a joke.