So one thing I wanted to point out about the interview...
Shiro asked OiC if he was JimJimJim.
OiC's response was the following
- He is
not JJJ, but he believes King Vanity is JJJ
- He says King Vanity emerged in Phil's YT chat and 'nobody knew who he was'
- He points out that KV had 'protection' coming from Phil that he could not be banned
- He says that he found that King Vanity had an account on KF under the name 'King Vanity'
- After KV was banned on YT, OiC noticed that King Vanity changed his account name to JimJimJim on KF
I can confirm that JimJimJim's account name on KF was originally King Vanity, so he has that much accurate.
However, I still recommend taking this with a grain of salt. OiC was quick to connect JJJ with King Vanity, but the issue is, if you recall, that it was strongly believed by the end of King Vanity's run that
he was OiC.
For one thing, he emerged when OiC was allegedly away on vacation. But there was later a time where the two overlapped in the chat.
When I started asking around, our own
@Iron Hamster quickly found the receipts:
Incident 1
- KV and OiC are active in the chat at the same time
- King Vanity posts in chat saying something that appears to actually be OiC (complaining that suprcrzy hates him)
- OiC then continues that line of thought on his account without acknowledging King Vanity
- This looks distinctly like OiC was talking on both accounts and accidently posted on KV what he was supposed to say on his OiC account
Incident 2
- A superchat identifies KV as OiC and Phil gets angry about it
- OiC leaves chat after Swagginz arrives and KV appears
- Swagginz makes what could be a facetious comment in defense of OiC, saying he is cool while KV is not. Swagginz is not documented as being overly fond of OiC so this does not seem sincere
- I have yet to find the video of Phil's freak out if anyone wants to chase that down
- The KV/OiC connection is actually what prompted the creation of the OiC containment thread by Paragon, which happens on the page after this one
So this isn't conclusive proof of anything, but it does keep the possibility open that OiC may have been lying about not being JJJ. He acknowledges that JJJ was KV, but that just creates a secondary problem because there is indication that OiC may have been KV to begin with.