SCP Foundation - Creepypasta with roid rage - now ITT: SCP fans

Yes. That is the whole fucking point of SCP and MFP, dumbass. You give the reader just enough detail so that they can make their own inferences. The original SCP was only 4 paragraphs long, yet it inspired an entire genre of Internet fiction because it leaves the reader pondering "what is this thing, really?" "where did it come from?" "why does it want to kill people?" and "what is this mysterious organization that catalogues items such as this?".
scrolling through pinterest images accomplishes the same thing (.....DOOOOD, IT PIQUES YOUR CURIOSITY!!! I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WHAT STORIES COULD UNFOLD WITH THIS PLOT-DEVICE THAT ISN'T BEING USED FOR ANYTHING!!!)
pick up a novel that wasn't written by stephen king
 
short to mid-sized SCPs go nowhere because they just describe "it does X, Y and Z"
so i'm like, "ok, but why does the author want me to read this, besides thinking 'oh cool'?" but you can't give them a meaningful narrative without resorting to more conventional storywriting through discovery logs, interviews and addendums
it's the same thing with Mystery Flesh Pit and its travel brochures, uniforms and OSHA signs but the creator doesn't paint it as storytelling
The entire website is supposed to be formatted as briefings for how to deal with these anomalies and some background information so you know how to not die when dealing with it. It's not supposed to read like a novella of some greater narrative. It's the difference between technical writing and creative writing.
 
The entire website is supposed to be formatted as briefings for how to deal with these anomalies and some background information so you know how to not die when dealing with it.
but SCP authors are trying to fit a meaningful narrative in this restrictive format which naturally ends up becoming a novella with the format as an afterthought
i don't get why people think you can make it work outside of plotless plot-devices that only exist to be cool and "pique your curiosity"
 
but SCP authors are trying to fit a meaningful narrative in this restrictive format which naturally ends up becoming a novella with the format as an afterthought
i don't get why people think you can make it work outside of plotless plot-devices that only exist to be cool and "pique your curiosity"
You don't need an entire cinematic universe in what's effectively a monster and weird thing encyclopedia entry. You can mold a story around it and keep it to its own section. We've gone from "This concrete statue kills people and we're not sure how or why" to "there's forty billion alternate realities and this SCP is one of the ones where humanity dies" and it's really incongruous to the rest of the motif.
 
You don't need an entire cinematic universe in what's effectively a monster and weird thing encyclopedia entry. You can mold a story around it and keep it to its own section. We've gone from "This concrete statue kills people and we're not sure how or why" to "there's forty billion alternate realities and this SCP is one of the ones where humanity dies" and it's really incongruous to the rest of the motif.
i haven't said i was in favor of SCP's autism, just that its writers would be better off writing more traditional works than trying to cram a narrative into a format that only works for things only existing to be cool or weird
 
oh ok so we have to get the readers to make up a story
mfp is a worldbuilding project; the images are there to look cool, and the only story that exists is localized to the incident reports
Are you one of those autistic niggas that literally has to have everything spelled out for him? Can you not understand the concept of minimalist storytelling? Dude, people can tell a full story with just pictures, no words, and you can't understand how people can tell compelling narratives with just clinical reports?
 
Are you one of those autistic niggas that literally has to have everything spelled out for him? Can you not understand the concept of minimalist storytelling? Dude, people can tell a full story with just pictures, no words, and you can't understand how people can tell compelling narratives with just clinical reports?
Nah dude, Ernest Hemingway was a dumbass. There's no story! How am I supposed to get anything out of just a few words?
 
you niggers haven't written any fiction before and if you do you'll realize that writing something which only exists to "be cool" would be completely pointless and waste your reader's time (unless you're stephen king, then you can confuse your readers about which scenes and details are important by writing the most useless things while still being viewed as a good author)
a classified ad about shoes that haven't been worn isn't a story despite what wikipedia says
 
you niggers haven't written any fiction before and if you do you'll realize that writing something which only exists to "be cool" would be completely pointless and waste your reader's time (unless you're stephen king, then you can confuse your readers about which scenes and details are important by writing the most useless things while still being viewed as a good author)
a classified ad about shoes that haven't been worn isn't a story despite what wikipedia says
Are you done with your projecting you spastic?
 
you niggers haven't written any fiction before and if you do you'll realize that writing something which only exists to "be cool" would be completely pointless and waste your reader's time (unless you're stephen king, then you can confuse your readers about which scenes and details are important by writing the most useless things while still being viewed as a good author)
a classified ad about shoes that haven't been worn isn't a story despite what wikipedia says
Aside from your endless sperging, I still have no idea what the hell exactly you want?
 
my original point was that SCP authors shouldn't paint the format as a way to tell stories and turn their articles into novellas by awkwardly fitting in addendums
You're so bad at communicating that your initial message seems to say the exact opposite. What the fuck are you going on about?
 
You're so bad at communicating that your initial message seems to say the exact opposite. What the fuck are you going on about?
RPC-429 is probably the best SCP i've read but 95% of it is a (well-written) chatlog that the containment procedures, description etc have been lumped on top of
i haven't said i was in favor of SCP's autism, just that its writers would be better off writing more traditional works than trying to cram a narrative into a format that only works for things only existing to be cool or weird
by "the best SCP i've read" i meant the chatlog was written well
i think you should read what i have to say before rating me trashcans like an A&H poster
 
scrolling through pinterest images accomplishes the same thing (.....DOOOOD, IT PIQUES YOUR CURIOSITY!!! I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WHAT STORIES COULD UNFOLD WITH THIS PLOT-DEVICE THAT ISN'T BEING USED FOR ANYTHING!!!)
pick up a novel that wasn't written by stephen king
Holy shit you're a fucking imbecile
 
nigger you can't tell a story through the bureaucracy gimmick, that's what i was trying to say
an SCP that tries to tell a narrative has to use more conventional storywriting which is longer than telling the reader "my SCP does XYZ, bye"
at that point, the bureaucracy is an afterthought that can be easily cut out
Shut up fag.
 
Back