SCP Foundation - Creepypasta with roid rage - now ITT: SCP fans

[ToS]

Well, that was fast. Kaktus, I understand that you need to do a little bit of twisting to make this look good for you and your little clique, but come on. There's like an entire page of posts dedicated to us demanding stronger proof for the existence of this "cabal" from Roget/Harmony, and I've personally emphasized the lack of strong proof multiple times while discussing the claims here. The claim that you're secretly controlling the wiki from behind the scenes isn't something any of us have even tried to push. Anyone who bothers to actually read the thread can see how much you're stretching here.

We should play a drinking game, 1 (one) shot each time Kaktus makes it clear he checks this thread more than we do, 2 (two) shots when he directly gives us publicity.

Edit: 3 shots when he lets us know we are over the target.

 

[Furret]

We should play a drinking game, 1 (one) shot each time Kaktus makes it clear he checks this thread more than we do, 2 (two) shots when he directly gives us publicity.

No thanks, I quite like my liver.

 

[Lil' Misogynist]

No thanks, I quite like my liver.

I don’t, but the liquor store is closed at this hour.

 

[Cow-Chan]

Well, that was fast. Kaktus, I understand that you need to do a little bit of twisting to make this look good for you and your little clique, but come on. There's like an entire page of posts dedicated to us demanding stronger proof for the existence of this "cabal" from Roget/Harmony, and I've personally emphasized the lack of strong proof multiple times while discussing the claims here. The claim that you're secretly controlling the wiki from behind the scenes isn't something any of us have even tried to push. Anyone who bothers to actually read the thread can see how much you're stretching here.

Kaktus clings to literally any form of major topic in order to seem relevant. I wonder if he'd die if he lost access to the internet for more than a week from starvation.

 

[Shitassdeaddude]

We should play a drinking game, 1 (one) shot each time Kaktus makes it clear he checks this thread more than we do, 2 (two) shots when he directly gives us publicity.

Edit: 3 shots when he lets us know we are over the target.

I hope he jumps on here and tries to pull shit like he did on the RPC discord.

 

[ToS]

Kaktus clings to literally any form of major topic in order to seem relevant. I wonder if he'd die if he lost access to the internet for more than a week from starvation.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. He's like the cancer that has to stay, the surgery on his ego wouldn't be survivable.

 

[Furret]

For some reason, I can't help but feel like you're lying to me. Also, you seem to have fundamentally misunderstood lolcows. If we got rid of them, we wouldn't have the entertainment that makes this forum worth using. Plus, the dumps are fun to look through when I'm bored.

 

[Cow-Chan]

For some reason, I can't help but feel like you're lying to me. Also, you seem to have fundamentally misunderstood lolcows. If we got rid of them, we wouldn't have the entertainment that makes this forum worth using. Plus, the dumps are fun to look through when I'm bored.

Considering he's already a sex pest, it wouldn't surprise me if Kuktits had a humiliation fetish. He's probably purposefully egging KF on for attention that he can jerk off to.

 

[LordSifr]

So what you're saying is

The election is rigged?

Spoiler: I am so sorry,

This whole system's rigged, and we all know the riggers...

 

[Furret]

Considering he's already a sex pest, it wouldn't surprise me if Kuktits had a humiliation fetish. He's probably purposefully egging KF on for attention that he can jerk off to.

Good point, I should probably stop indulging him by facilitating this autistic multi-platform back-and-forth.

 

[Cow-Chan]

Good point, I should probably stop indulging him by facilitating this autistic multi-platform back-and-forth.

Yeah, I'd suggest waiting to hound him unless there's something solid that can actually get him into serious heat. Say, him demanding nudes in DMs, for instance. Just an example.

 

[Shitassdeaddude]

Good point, I should probably stop indulging him by facilitating this autistic multi-platform back-and-forth.

Yep. If he wants to talk to us he can put on his big boy pants and do it like a man.

 

[Spedestrian]

Kaktus.

Take the SAMSARA shit out of 1730. It's like the Justice League movie barging in on a perfectly good horror skip.

While he's at it he should take the djKaktus shit out of SCP-049. It's like metahorror about torturing a horror story to death by stretching it out too far and cutting its balls off by overexplaining shit.

An inscrutable paranormal doctor that guts people, turns them into twitching horrors, and says it's curing them? That's scary. A pathetic delusional retard who kills things and stuffs them full of bullshit while convincing himself that he's helping? That's just the author.

 

[Valstrax]

An inscrutable paranormal doctor that guts people, turns them into twitching horrors, and says it's curing them? That's scary. A pathetic delusional retard who kills things and stuffs them full of bullshit while convincing himself that he's helping? That's just the author.

That's somehow a perfect metaphor for a horror author trying way too hard. I'm impressed.

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

We should play a drinking game, 1 (one) shot each time Kaktus makes it clear he checks this thread more than we do, 2 (two) shots when he directly gives us publicity.

Edit: 3 shots when he lets us know we are over the target.

The crying about not finding more evidence of his crimes yet is odd but telling. It’s millions of lines of logs, 80% of them have nothing to do with him. Let him hang on our every word until we get there

 

[Judge Dredd]

Do it. Just put it on RPC or better yet, make it your own thing.

None of them seem to stick. The normies don't know everything has been retconed to be shit, and the rest collapse due to internal drama. A KiwiFarms SCP clone has a better chance of sticking around at this point.

 

[Furret]

None of them seem to stick. The normies don't know everything has been retconed to be shit, and the rest collapse due to internal drama. A KiwiFarms SCP clone has a better chance of sticking around at this point.

RPC is surviving on the small group of people who want to write for SCP but know all the reasons why being a part of that community is a terrible idea, but if those people ever decide to pack up and move on then it'll probably just die off.

 

[AnOminous]

Now this begs the question: why would they even choose rank-choice voting if the are going to give voters the option leave Proposal II out of their preference choice? I believe it's because there is a popular online perception that rank-choice voting is inherently better than the common US/UK first-past-the-post systems.

Well, I'd say it raises the question, not begs it, but whatever. There's a proposition in decision theory that including a completely unwanted option nobody wants can be used to bias the choice between the two actual options. This looks like such a bogus option.

 

[BurnerPhone]

Well, I'd say it raises the question, not begs it, but whatever. There's a proposition in decision theory that including a completely unwanted option nobody wants can be used to bias the choice between the two actual options. This looks like such a bogus option.

If your goal is to keep the articles on the site, your absolute best choice would be to vote (3, 0, 2) for proposals I, II, and III, respectively. Conversely, if you only and absolutely want the articles to go, your absolute best vote is (0, 3, 0). So that's our Nash equilibrium, which would be fine if there were an equal number of voters on each side, but we know the vote is rigged to push voters towards Proposals I and III, so despite Proposal 2 theoretically being able to win, it's chances are virtually zero. For the people whose equilibrium choices are not (0, 3, 0) or (3, 0, 2) , their vote will be split among the different proposals with a variety of values, which is more of a fail-safe mechanism than anything to account for "illogical" voters. This elaborate vote manipulation construction by SCP is unnecessary because the majority of SCP users want to keep the articles on the site anyway. They overdesigned a voting system to guarantee a win on a policy proposal that they are already guaranteed to win.

 

[Furret]

Well, I'd say it raises the question, not begs it, but whatever. There's a proposition in decision theory that including a completely unwanted option nobody wants can be used to bias the choice between the two actual options. This looks like such a bogus option.

Yeah, it's probably bullshit. They want to do ranked choice because they know it'll be popular among the userbase, but ranked choice is functionally indistinguishable from FPTP if you only have two options, so they've thrown in a third option that's basically indistinguishable from the option they want (if they delete the articles with an option to bring them back on request, the community is going to request every article be put back up immediately, and they know that). They've also allowed people to not rank options, which they know will lead to a lot of people skipping the option to delete. They've stacked the deck as hard as possible against the option they don't want to implement so they can create the appearance of caring about what the community thinks, when in reality they don't care at all and they're only doing this so they have an excuse later when the decision they make is inevitably unpopular with some portion of the community.