SCP Foundation - Creepypasta with roid rage - now ITT: SCP fans

Lil' Misogynist said:
This is going to be a long post, but I’ve cut out some of the more personal stuff in the interest of saving time. @Cow-Chan is Spookybee. She is a former member of the SCP community and the original creator of the large IRC NSFW chatroom #Site12 that’s been discussed several times in this thread. She has also gone by the names “Skitty”, “Neon”, “Snail Salesman”, and “Snaily” on Discord. I don’t find it a coincidence that she joined this forum anonymously. On May 4th, 2020 she was banned by the Anti-Harassment Team for inappropriate sexual conduct towards multiple underage users while holding a great deal of influence and responsibility within the community. Though I was suspicious when I learned that she joined this forum, I wanted to give her the benefit of the doubt. I’ve changed my mind for two reasons:
1. I’ve been made aware that she has been spreading a significant amount of lies about the reason she was removed from the SCP Wiki.
2. She has learned absolutely nothing and was recently re-banned from the RPC community for sexual behavior towards a minor.

Recently I was shown an interview by someone who wanted to ask Spookybee about her experiences in the SCP fandom. Though some of it contains useful information, it rapidly turned into a hit piece against myself and another person. I can’t post most of it out of respect of the interviewer’s wishes and other people’s privacy, but I will address this part:

View attachment 2318133
View attachment 2318134
View attachment 2318135

A bit of a timeline: Spookybee was banned from the RPC community in July of 2019, then unbanned in May of 2020, banned from the SCP community two days later, and then re-banned from the RPC community two weeks ago. I’ll address the reasons that led to each. In case it needs to be said, Spookybee is lying in the screenshot above. A long time ago, I had a conversation with someone who I considered a friend about some of the predatory behavior that they’d observed from other people in the SCP fandom, and Bee’s name came up. I don’t think it has made its way to KF yet, so I’ll post it here:

View attachment 2318138
View attachment 2318139

I don’t agree with the other person’s use of “pedo” in this context, but the age gap was significant enough that I found the relationship concerning. As for why Spookybee got banned from the RPC community… back when I was active in their Discord server, Bee had a habit of harassing me unprovoked whenever we crossed paths in the chat. At the time her Discord username was “Skitty”, a name I didn’t recognize. (I should note that Bee apologized for how she treated me a few months ago, but seeing how she talks about the situation in the interview above, I guess that’s been rescinded.) I eventually learned her identity when trying to figure out the reason why she was so hostile towards me, and remembering the conversation that I had with my friend, I reported her to the RPC Discord moderators. One of the then-moderators pushed to ban her because of the testimony, and that was that. Shortly after, it was discovered that she was also active in Malvyn’s Corner, a mostly NSFW RPC fringe server, which the moderators also decided to ban her from. Another friend of mine wanted to confront her after she was banned from there as well, and showed me the following confession after they had a long conversation:

View attachment 2318141
View attachment 2318142
View attachment 2318143

Bee was unbanned from the RPC Discord server almost a year later. As far as I know, the decision was made without most of the staff team being consulted beforehand. I was told the following when I asked one of the mods why the decision had suddenly been reversed:

View attachment 2318144

As it turned out, the problem was not that the original report had been disproven; just that it had been declared not worth acting upon.

Like I said earlier, two days later, Spookybee was banned from the SCP community. Several months prior, I had sent Soulless the information from the two above conversations with my friends in the large report I made to him, so the Anti-Harassment Team was already partly aware of the situation. Apparently, I had actually been missing a significant part of the story. Bee had inappropriate conduct with multiple underage users (at least two confirmed, possibly more), and one of them was 16 at the time. The information has actually been documented here on Kiwifarms for over a year, in this post. As far as I can tell, all the information in it is accurate, but for some reason it was almost totally glossed over when it was posted. Feel free to read over it if you haven’t.

So what happened this time? I’m not totally sure on the details, but Bee was quietly banned again from the RPC server about two weeks ago for sexual behavior around a minor.

View attachment 2318145
View attachment 2318146

For clarity, the RPC community has rules in place that adults and minors shouldn’t act sexual around each other in any capacity for safety reasons. Given the circumstances under which she was banned, I’m going to guess it happened privately. In other words, even after successfully slipping back into the anomalous fiction sphere, Bee still hasn’t learned to control herself.

With that being said, I can’t say that I’m totally surprised. Aside from the fact that Bee appears to flip-flop between feeling sorry and playing dumb when the topic comes up, ever since she got banned from the SCP Wiki, she’s been trying to make herself look as child-like as possible in her Discord icon to distract people from her history of questionable behavior.

View attachment 2318153
View attachment 2318154

Yes Bee, I imagine it would make you look really weird if everyone knew that you were actually in your mid-20s and not 19.

To be clear, I don’t think that Spookybee’s actions overall are unforgivable. It’s the lying and endless self-victimization that I’m bothered by. It’s becoming pretty obvious that her presence here has been nothing but a desperate attempt to get revenge on the SCP admin team and salvage her reputation. I don’t think she’s been dishonest about everything. The things that she’s said about Bright in particular line up with everything else I’ve heard, as does the accusation against Salvagebar. But I wouldn’t trust much of anything else she has to say from here on out, assuming that one of the moderators of this website lifts her threadban.

In regards to the rumor that Bee groomed someone in Malvyn’s Corner, I remember it and I don’t think it’s true in the slightest. There was a 16-year-old teen in the server at the time, but as far as I know, she didn’t approach him for anything. I’m not sure where it started, but I think it’s important to keep in mind that this isn’t the first time a rumor has spiraled out of control in the RPC Discord server. There’s a lot of information to keep up with in the SCP drama world, and not everyone has time to do so. As a result, a simple question can turn into a game of telephone. I can say for sure that I didn’t start the rumor and it was neither part of the information I gave to RPC staff nor SCP staff when reporting Bee. I’m sympathetic, but I also don’t know what else to say here. I can’t apologize for something I didn’t do.

In regards to the events I vaguely referenced in a post I made here, I wasn’t talking about Bee nor the other person she guessed. I was referring to a time that the moderators of a small personal NSFW-ish server asked me for info about Gabriel Jade after he had been banned from the SCP Wiki, and another time that Saxiao attempted to sneak into the RPC Discord server to join his #guntalk buddies and was banned shortly after. This is venturing into personal conflict territory, but I think it’s worth mentioning since both of those people have been the subject of this thread before.

Bee, for God’s sake, please just find a new social circle, move on from all of this like you keep saying that you want to, do something more productive with your life than chatting with strangers on the internet all day, and learn to keep it in your pants from now on.

View attachment 2318158
Click to expand...
is the person with the blued-out name mlister
 
Got through Season 1 of Magnus Archives and it’s really highlighted something I’ve always disliked about SCP but never actively thought about - the fact that the Foundation is this near-omnipotent organization with endless resources and manpower, to the point that they seem to have plants in every hick-town PD on the off chance that an anomaly is gonna pop up in Nowheresville, Idaho.

I think a less powerful, more financially limited Foundation that actually has to balance the books to determine which anomalies should be contained and which ones should be researched and neutralized, one that doesn’t have a seemingly endless supply of death row inmates and private militia to send into dangerous anomalies, that can’t afford to build gigantic underground containment facilities for eldritch horrors at the drop of a hat, would make for much more interesting worldbuilding.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kabuki Actor, UzumakiLeaf, Flaming Insignias and 8 others
Gar For Archer said:
Got through Season 1 of Magnus Archives and it’s really highlighted something I’ve always disliked about SCP but never actively thought about - the fact that the Foundation is this near-omnipotent organization with endless resources and manpower, to the point that they seem to have plants in every hick-town PD on the off chance that an anomaly is gonna pop up in Nowheresville, Idaho.

I think a less powerful, more financially limited Foundation that actually has to balance the books to determine which anomalies should be contained and which ones should be researched and neutralized, one that doesn’t have a seemingly endless supply of death row inmates and private militia to send into dangerous anomalies, that can’t afford to build gigantic underground containment facilities for eldritch horrors at the drop of a hat, would make for much more interesting worldbuilding.
Click to expand...
"Dude, wake up! That brick must've hit you hard in the head... 6000+ SCPs? Pride Month? Homestuck? What are you talking about, there's only like 1000. C'mon, let's go play SCP-087-B together."
 
  • Feels
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: "Controlled Demolition", Blatant hypocrite, Liquid Marlon and 18 others
Gar For Archer said:
Got through Season 1 of Magnus Archives and it’s really highlighted something I’ve always disliked about SCP but never actively thought about - the fact that the Foundation is this near-omnipotent organization with endless resources and manpower, to the point that they seem to have plants in every hick-town PD on the off chance that an anomaly is gonna pop up in Nowheresville, Idaho.

I think a less powerful, more financially limited Foundation that actually has to balance the books to determine which anomalies should be contained and which ones should be researched and neutralized, one that doesn’t have a seemingly endless supply of death row inmates and private militia to send into dangerous anomalies, that can’t afford to build gigantic underground containment facilities for eldritch horrors at the drop of a hat, would make for much more interesting worldbuilding.
Click to expand...
The problem with this is that it's way harder to balance with the nature of a collaborative writing website - it really limits what you can write, and subjects you to a particular kind of framing that can be a pain to work with if you don't like it. RPC tries this to a degree but it suffers from the same problem (if to a lesser degree).
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
Reactions: highlighter_shitposting, Mexican_Wizard_711, HIVidaBoheme and 1 other person
Punished “Venom” pH said:
There was never just one SCP-001, there are a variety of “proposals” with the implied caveat that some or all of them are disinformation in-universe. Out of universe it’s a nice way to neatly sidestep the headaches of having a single 001 article.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah I remember on the SCP list 001 was always restricted with no content but I was reading the 682 termination experiments log and there is a description of 001 in there (at the time the 001 page was still [RESTRICTED] or whatever) so I thought that was the "real" 001.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RurkerHivemind, Flaming Insignias, Toolbox and 3 others
Staff have responded to the outcry around the most unpopular administrator candidate of all time by making some adjustments to the window dressing.

The most important takeaway, I think, is another symptom of their continually eroding authority and prestige by opening up admin promotion votes from an infinitesimally small voter pool to a fractionally tiny one.

This is following a pattern set by the so-called community vote to ratify stealing my labor, the staff are no longer confident enough to rule by decree and don’t trust one another enough to settle things by internal debate.

More and more they have to give way to popular ratification to replace their eroded prestige. If this is the best they can do after a month of their “intensive” deliberations, there’s only going to be more pain in their future.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, Flaming Insignias, Toolbox and 4 others
Saw this video explaining the story behind the "terrifying" scp-1875 photo. Thought something was off the whole time and then the guy says that this was an image replacement that "had to be" made because of some copyright nonsense. This guy's whole video wasn't even about the long standing original photo which was way creepier, but about a shitty placeholder put in years later. How did an edited photo of some women on a rollercoaster encounter such an issue? I know of other edits like to the plague doctor article among others. How bad has this gotten compounded with unnecessary edits to the actual story content of older pages?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Flaming Insignias, Cryonic Haunted Bullets and 3 others
Toolbox said:
Saw this video explaining the story behind the "terrifying" scp-1875 photo. Thought something was off the whole time and then the guy says that this was an image replacement that "had to be" made because of some copyright nonsense. This guy's whole video wasn't even about the long standing original photo which was way creepier, but about a shitty placeholder put in years later. How did an edited photo of some women on a rollercoaster encounter such an issue? I know of other edits like to the plague doctor article among others. How bad has this gotten compounded with unnecessary edits to the actual story content of older pages?
Click to expand...
What was the original photo?
 
Yukari Yakumo said:
What was the original photo?
Click to expand...
It was this.
VSLhWi_rp1jJzkgKPTRQ5rwzw_FR0Wt6ZPhI19AWhF8.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, Flaming Insignias, Exterminatus and 5 others
Yukari Yakumo said:
What was the original photo?
Click to expand...
I believe it was this

1627510054872.png

But the guy is incompotent in the video so shows this instead, someone's shitty recreation
1627510099970.png
Or maybe he was afraid the omnipotent copyright ghouls would see his video and strike it down.

Honestly now the face on the right reminds me of the truly scariest thing ever

 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: Kabuki Actor, Flaming Insignias, HIVidaBoheme and 1 other person
Toolbox said:
I believe it was this

View attachment 2387452

But the guy is incompotent in the video so shows this instead, someone's shitty recreation
View attachment 2387455
Or maybe he was afraid the omnipotent copyright ghouls would see his video and strike it down.

Honestly now the face on the right reminds me of the truly scariest thing ever

Click to expand...
First is creepy 2nd looks like this:
1627261042894.png
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, Lodoss Warrior, Staffy and 10 others
only scp-related by proxy, but two staff members of the rpc authority site have resigned, with the former leaving this message before leaving. making note of due to the extreme autism on display here

i can't attest to the truth of these comments & opinions on referenced events, but the events themselves occurred (for the most part) as described (read ss's in reverse order won't upload properly for some reason)
 

Attachments

  • GGG2.PNG
    GGG2.PNG
    126 KB · Views: 244
  • GGG.PNG
    GGG.PNG
    114.1 KB · Views: 241
  • Informative
  • Autistic
  • Winner
Reactions: ABE LINN COHN, Toolbox, HIVidaBoheme and 5 others
penismuncher89 said:
only scp-related by proxy, but two staff members of the rpc authority site have resigned, with the former leaving this message before leaving. making note of due to the extreme autism on display here

i can't attest to the truth of these comments & opinions on referenced events, but the events themselves occurred (for the most part) as described (read ss's in reverse order won't upload properly for some reason)
Click to expand...
Blairin even now is still clinging to power even as it becomes more and more apparent that his despotic behavior is alienating everyone he needs to maintain a grip on authority. It’s amazing RPC has survived and even occasionally thrived with a string of incompetent tyrants leading the way. Even more incredible that nobody cared to politely push him out of the way after his lore team tampering and subsequent temper tantrum.
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: RurkerHivemind, Flaming Insignias, Baubius and 4 others
Punished “Venom” pH said:
Even more incredible that nobody cared to politely push him out of the way after his lore team tampering and subsequent temper tantrum.
Click to expand...
yeah, i've honestly never seen anything like it in an online community. not even SCP. where one individual stands so uncontested, so dominant in a wider space, that they can simply handwave entire dramas into non-existence -- or decide one day that A happened instead of B, and everyone concurs. crazy stuff
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Baubius, HIVidaBoheme and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back