Opinion Seattle Public Schools Want to Teach Social Justice in Math Class. That Hurts Minorities.

Seattle Public Schools Want to Teach Social Justice in Math Class. That Hurts Minorities.


Seattle’s public-school district has proposed a new math curriculum that would teach its students all about how math has been “appropriated” — and how it “continues to be used to oppress and marginalize people and communities.”

A draft of the curriculum, which was covered in an article in Education Week, would teach students how to “explain how math and technology and/or science are connected and how technology and/or science have (sic) been and continues to be used to oppress and marginalize people and communities of color,” as well as to “identify and teach others about mathematicians* of color in their various communities: schools, neighborhoods, places of worship, businesses, etc.”

Education Week reports:

If adopted, its ideas will be included in existing math classes as part of the district’s broader effort to infuse ethnic studies into all subjects across the K-12 spectrum. Tracy Castro-Gill, Seattle’s ethnic studies director, said her team hopes to have frameworks completed in all subjects by June for board approval.
If the frameworks are approved, teachers would be expected to incorporate those ideas and questions into the math they teach beginning next fall, Castro-Gill said. No districtwide—or mandated—math/ethnic studies curriculum is planned, but groups of teachers are working with representatives of local community organizations to write instructional units for teachers to use if they wish, she said.
As strange as it may sound, this proposed curriculum is not the first time that someone has argued for teaching math in this way. In fact, in 2017, an online course developed by Teach for America — titled “Teaching Social Justice Through Secondary Mathematics” — instructed how to teach their students how “math has been used as a dehumanizing tool.” Also in 2017, a University of Illinois math-education professor detailed what she saw as some of the more racist aspects of math, claiming that “mathematics itself operates as Whiteness.”

I wrote columns about both of these stories that year — and, at the time, most people likely saw them simply as examples of “fringe” beliefs, confined to only super-progressive, ultra-woke circles. With the announcement of this Seattle proposal, however, we can no longer reassure ourselves that this is the case. Now, the social-justice approach to teaching math has officially entered the mainstream (and taxpayer-funded!) arena.

This concerns me, and, believe it or not, that’s actually not because I despise “people and communities of color.” In fact, it’s quite the opposite: It’s because this approach to teaching math will only end up harming the very groups it claims it champions. As The American Conservative’sRod Dreher notes:

The young people who are going to learn real math are those whose parents can afford to put them in private schools. The public school kids of all races are going to get dumber and dumber.
Guess what? Minority students are far more likely to attend public school than whites. In fact, according to Private School Review, “[t]he average percent of minority students in private schools is approximately 28 percent.”

In other words? The minority students, the members of the very groups that this curriculum presumably aims to aid, are actually going to be learning less math than they would have without it — because they will be spending some of that class time learning about how math’s racism has hurt them. Ironically, one of the curriculum’s goals is to teach students how to “critique systems of power that deny access to mathematical knowledge to people and communities of color,” and yet, that’s exactly what the district itself would be doing with it.

The historical contributions of communities of color are important, and students should study them. A better place to study them, though, would (quite obviously) be a history class, not a mathematics one. Mathematics classes should be for mathematics lessons; this is especially important considering the fact that math is exactly where American students (of all races) struggle compared to students in other countries. In fact, according to a Pew Research study from 2017, American students ranked 38th out of 71 countries in the subject. If we want to fix this, we need to focus more on math, instead of looking for ways to teach less of it in the very classes where our students are supposed to be learning it.

The bottom line is: If Seattle’s school district really wants to help minority students excel in mathematics, the last thing it should be doing is proposing a math curriculum that would teach less of it in the schools that they’re most likely to attend.
—————————-

A reasonable article for once. It’s true though, the last thing those kids need is less math in math class.
 
Face it, we're in a new Dark Age. Your children will learn to fear the whyte maanu and struggle to count to three; while the elite children will be learning how to give orders to robot serfs. Mars will be colonized by the Chinese, who we must be so grateful for; as they freed us all from whyte imperialism. All hail Xi, emperor eternal.
 
Mathematics is the single fundamental language of all reality in the universe. Saying "math has been used to marginalize" is just their way of training children that if they see an unpleasant answer, they should just reject it as untrue because they deserve to be right all the time.
They say music is the only language the whole world understands. They never heard (c)rap.
 
This initiative is spearheaded by Tracy Castro-Gill, or "TenaciousT". (archive)

I don't know if she's thread worthy right now, but she is posting a lot of stupid shit on the internet and it might metastasize into a thread later, who knows.

View attachment 981909


People have been having very bad run-ins with her in the past - surprise surprise, lots of people getting called racist, slapfighting and circle jerks. The following link has a lot of stuff - I didn't find the slap-fight interesting but there's definitely a lot of content.

https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-strange-case-of-tracy-castro-gill.html
(archive)
I should have expected a white pig-woman.
Nothing more progressive than treating nonwhites like toddlers, eh? Nothing racist about that, no sir.
 
I agree with the idea that this math class proposal is nonsense. But we have to stop acting like nonwhites have to be harmed by something before it matters. You're not "owning the libs" by doing this. You're merely adopting the anti-white notion that white people have to go out of their way to cater to minorities. Why aren't whites allowed to discuss how things like this affect white people yet WHITE cuckservatives spend all day obsessing over how this'll affect minorities who'll never vote with them?

Also minorities keep voting for Democrats and don't raise any shit over things like this. So I don't care. When minorities start caring about white people then I'll start to give a shit about minorities.
 
Many serious drug culture fags I've know can do in head math involving numbers like 26, 35, and 454.
Just make sure not to make the mistake of noting how weird it is that 28 grams is exactly an ounce(it's not).

Sure way to out yourself as a pothead immediately.

If Janie has a privilege level of 3, and Jamal has a privilege level of 2, and a white person chides them both for being late, how many Hitlers is he?

A: Who are you to discount my lived experience, shitlord?

Die cis scum is partial credit.
 
Make the classrooms smaller, quit using the goddamn gym (or gender studies) teachers to teach algebra, stop with the goddamn common core (seriously, don't start by teaching the kids shortcuts, they'll never understand the underpinnings like that) and you'll see America's math test scores start to rise.

Stop hiring teachers with online degrees from University Of Phoenix should be on that list as well.
 
I mean - kinda, Math past a certain point doesn't have numbers (you miss them). Get into analysis (real, complex, number theory) and past a certain point of complexity and your ability to know what has been proven is questionable. In theory Fermat's last theorem has a proof, in reality people still question it.

I agree for the applied side of math you are (generally) dealing with something concrete, which can be quite appealing, but if you want that I suggest engineering.
Have you ever actually taken an upper-level math course? (powerlevel)I'm double majoring in math and those proof-based courses are fully concrete; the difference between them and k-12 and calculus math is instead of using a formula from the textbook to compute given quantities, you need to do something like prove that some theorem is true using variables: as a basic example, "prove that for any odd number n, n + 1 is an even number".
 
Back