Sebastian Daskawicz-Davis / Cart Narcs / Agent Sebastian - I want you in me Cart Narc

Is the cart narc based?

  • Returning the cart is the one true test of Whiteness, and thus the cart narc is based.

    Votes: 1,255 59.3%
  • Narcing is the ultimate bitch move, and thus the cart narc is unbased.

    Votes: 489 23.1%
  • Returning the cart is White culture, and thus sharing it is unbased cultural appropriation.

    Votes: 373 17.6%

  • Total voters
    2,117
That is a crime and self defense cannot be used as defense against it. Your only allowed to use your gun if you fear for your life. By not firing you counter that assertion. The same applies to firing warning shots.

It's a crime in probably every state but Texas.

Cart Narc went right to the cops the first time a gun was brandished on him and they told him to fuck off because the dude was sitting in his own vehicle. Brandishing is labeled as deadly conduct in Texas and the misdemeanor version of it is sometimes called unlawful display and you basically can't be charged with it if you don't point the weapon or discharge it while on your property, which they extended to his vehicle. Maybe him exiting the vehicle puts it over the threshold, but I'd bet a cop or a prosecutor would extend the meaning of his property to around the car and also take into consideration the weapon was never withdrawn unlike last time.

Here's a thought experiment though:

Do what Cart Narc did to an on duty American cop (run full speed at them in a bullet proof vest) I bet you at least get a gun pointed at you, if not mag dumped upon.

Do what Lazybones did to an on duty American cop (show that you are armed in a threatening manner) I bet you at least get a gun pointed at you, if not mag dumped upon.
 
Last edited:
Do we really think it's legal in Texas to brandish your firearm at someone when they are no physical threat to you? This is both retarded from a legal standpoint and an ethical firearms ownership standpoint. Lets use our brains here, people. Texas is not the wild west you think it is. It is a state halfway made up of Mexicans, do you really think it'd be functional if they were allowed to wave guns at anyone they want? This would almost certainly be considered by any jury as "...conduct that places another in imminent danger of serious bodily injury." qualifying it as Deadly Conduct in the state of Texas. It might be debatable for this case since he was running at his car, but let's not pretend like it's legal to brandish firearms at people in the state of Texas.
 
Do we really think it's legal in Texas to brandish your firearm at someone when they are no physical threat to you? This is both retarded from a legal standpoint and an ethical firearms ownership standpoint. Lets use our brains here, people. Texas is not the wild west you think it is. It is a state halfway made up of Mexicans, do you really think it'd be functional if they were allowed to wave guns at anyone they want? This would almost certainly be considered by any jury as "...conduct that places another in imminent danger of serious bodily injury." qualifying it as Deadly Conduct in the state of Texas. It might be debatable for this case since he was running at his car, but let's not pretend like it's legal to brandish firearms at people in the state of Texas.
Are you retarded? He didn’t point it at him and it never left the holster. If simply showing someone that you are armed is a crime, especially if they are running at you like an autistic maniac after you’ve already made it abundantly clear that you want nothing to do with them then I don’t want to live in your fantasy world. Thankfully though you are wrong.
 
Do we really think it's legal in Texas to brandish your firearm at someone when they are no physical threat to you? This is both retarded from a legal standpoint and an ethical firearms ownership standpoint. Lets use our brains here, people. Texas is not the wild west you think it is. It is a state halfway made up of Mexicans, do you really think it'd be functional if they were allowed to wave guns at anyone they want? This would almost certainly be considered by any jury as "...conduct that places another in imminent danger of serious bodily injury." qualifying it as Deadly Conduct in the state of Texas. It might be debatable for this case since he was running at his car, but let's not pretend like it's legal to brandish firearms at people in the state of Texas.

Not sure what to tell you, I know it was linked earlier, but the first guy unholsters, points it in the air and racks it. And the cops basically say he was in his own truck and he didn't know what was going on, case closed, get fucked Cart Narc.


Like I said, this other guy might have broken that threshold by simply exiting his car, but he's still within the immediate vicinity of his property, no cop/prosecutor/jury in Texas is going to fault him.

Yes, showing someone your gun is a crime. It's called brandishing.

Jeeeeeesus .... the explanation for all of this is just within these last two pages ....
 
I'd implore you armchair lawyers to contact a real lawyer in the state of Texas and ask them if it's a good idea to flash your gun at someone
If you showed a lawyer or the cops in Texas this video and said you wanted to press charges they would laugh you out of their office or just tell you to fuck off much like the previous cops did lmao
 
Last edited:
I'd implore you armchair lawyers to contact a real lawyer in the state of Texas and ask them if it's a good idea to flash your gun at someone

You must be Texan, since they aren't really known for their readily absorption of nuance.

You also must be Fresh Meat because any real Kiwi would have implored me to just go around flashing my gun in Texas instead of just talking to some faggoty ass Texas lawyer.
 
Do we really think it's legal in Texas to brandish your firearm at someone when they are no physical threat to you? This is both retarded from a legal standpoint and an ethical firearms ownership standpoint. Lets use our brains here, people. Texas is not the wild west you think it is. It is a state halfway made up of Mexicans, do you really think it'd be functional if they were allowed to wave guns at anyone they want? This would almost certainly be considered by any jury as "...conduct that places another in imminent danger of serious bodily injury." qualifying it as Deadly Conduct in the state of Texas. It might be debatable for this case since he was running at his car, but let's not pretend like it's legal to brandish firearms at people in the state of Texas.
Your first mistake is not understanding that open carry is legal in Texas without a permit. Your second mistake is not understanding that brandishing a weapon is only illegal in a public place and only if it is calculated to cause alarm. Your vehicle is not a public place and in Texas you have a right to defend your vehicle and no duty to retreat. Third, in Texas what cart narc did in that video is felony stalking.

Sec. 42.072
Stalking​

A person commits an offense if the person, on more than one occasion and pursuant to the same scheme or course of conduct that is directed specifically at another person, knowingly engages in conduct that:

(1)​

constitutes an offense under Section 42.07 (Harassment), or that the actor knows or reasonably should know the other person will regard as threatening:

(A)​

bodily injury or death for the other person;

(B)​

bodily injury or death for a member of the other person’s family or household or for an individual with whom the other person has a dating relationship; or

(C)​

that an offense will be committed against the other person’s property;

The body armor he is wearing in the commission of a felony is itself another crime in Texas. The fact he approaches multiple times after the guy tried to leave is what makes it felony stalking.
 
Here I was thinking I was pointing how it it's obviously not legal to brandish a firearm as people are saying, something anyone with a room temperature IQ or the ability to google "can I brandish a gun in Texas" would understand. But now I see, we're too busy reaching and coping because we love behaving like niggers so much. Anything done against cart narcs cannot be illegal and anything he does can be illegal. No, my first mistake was pointing out an obvious logical flaw in the midst of a nigger circlejerk.
 
Here I was thinking I was pointing how it it's obviously not legal to brandish a firearm as people are saying, something anyone with a room temperature IQ or the ability to google "can I brandish a gun in Texas" would understand. But now I see, we're too busy reaching and coping because we love behaving like niggers so much. Anything done against cart narcs cannot be illegal and anything he does can be illegal. No, my first mistake was pointing out an obvious logical flaw in the midst of a nigger circlejerk.
We’ve posted the relevant statutes you got anything to back your side up? Or is it just because someone scared your autistic daddy?
 
No.

Lol, lmao even.

Can you even fucking read?
What a withering rebuttal. Truly my mind has been changed now.

We’ve posted the relevant statutes you got anything to back your side up? Or is it just because someone scared your autistic daddy?
He apparently doesn't know that "brandishing" isn't even called that in Texas, so i don't put too much value into his analysis.

I truly don't understand why people think that people have to put up with this harrassment in Texas, or that people have no recourse but to take it. The only reason cart narc isn't in jail is because there are bigger fish for the police to fry and it would be a drain on the taxpayer.
 
Last edited:
What a withering rebuttal. Truly my mind has been changed now
Nigger, all you have to do is read and you can see that it doesn't even pass the bar of harassment, let alone fucking stalking.

Christ, fine ... let me whittle down and rearrange the legalize a bit and you point me to the thing he is doing.

Harassment
(a)A person commits an offense if

The intent is to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another,

Yep, no question, intent qualifies.

Let's get to the rest of the statute to see if any of the actions qualify now.


the person:

(1)initiates communication and in the course of the communication makes a comment, request, suggestion, or proposal that is obscene;

“Obscene” means containing a patently offensive description of or a solicitation to commit an ultimate sex act, including sexual intercourse, masturbation, cunnilingus, fellatio, or anilingus, or a description of an excretory function.

Nope

(2)threatens to inflict bodily injury on the person or to commit a felony against the person, a member of the person’s family or household, or the person’s property;

Tossing a non-marking magnet on a car is not a criminal offense, and if it is even construed to one somehow, it's not a felony.

(3)conveys that another person has suffered death or serious bodily injury;

Nope

(4)causes the telephone ...
(5) makes a telephone call ...
(6)knowingly permits a telephone under ...
(7)sends repeated electronic communications ...

Nope

And if you think the "offense against property" term being used in the stalking statute in 1(C) has any bearing, it's defined later on as a felony if you actually link it:


So go ahead, now find some bullshit vandal statue now so you can continue with your cope that ACHTULLLLLAAY removable, non-marking magnets and being annoying are felonies.
 
Everyone is on edge and so should think twice. CN should think twice about how he conducts himself and the individuals he films also should also think twice about how they respond. These are troubling times in the pages of history and amidst the pages of this particularly well researched thread about something that seems to be generating quite a lively discussion for what can be both a pet peeve, common courtesy,etc.!

Everyone is living this experience called The Greatest Show on Earth with all its ups and downs. It's unique and beautiful and produces very good herb. Very good friends. Very good kiwis. You fellow birds are absolutely fabulous and the fruit can go fuck itself because it doesn't have any flavor.
 
Nigger, all you have to do is read and you can see that it doesn't even pass the bar of harassment, let alone fucking stalking.

Christ, fine ... let me whittle down and rearrange the legalize a bit and you point me to the thing he is doing.

Harassment
(a)A person commits an offense if

The intent is to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another,

Yep, no question, intent qualifies.

Let's get to the rest of the statute to see if any of the actions qualify now.


the person:

(1)initiates communication and in the course of the communication makes a comment, request, suggestion, or proposal that is obscene;

“Obscene” means containing a patently offensive description of or a solicitation to commit an ultimate sex act, including sexual intercourse, masturbation, cunnilingus, fellatio, or anilingus, or a description of an excretory function.

Nope

(2)threatens to inflict bodily injury on the person or to commit a felony against the person, a member of the person’s family or household, or the person’s property;

Tossing a non-marking magnet on a car is not a criminal offense, and if it is even construed to one somehow, it's not a felony.

(3)conveys that another person has suffered death or serious bodily injury;

Nope

(4)causes the telephone ...
(5) makes a telephone call ...
(6)knowingly permits a telephone under ...
(7)sends repeated electronic communications ...

Nope

And if you think the "offense against property" term being used in the stalking statute in 1(C) has any bearing, it's defined later on as a felony if you actually link it:


So go ahead, now find some bullshit vandal statue now so you can continue with your cope that ACHTULLLLLAAY removable, non-marking magnets and being annoying are felonies.
I posted and deleted a rebuttal to this because i actually did change my mind based on this explanation. Mostly because the tampering with a vehicle part is nebulous, it would be criminal mischief and that requires intent to cause damage, and realistically no prosecutor in Texas would take this case.
 
Last edited:
Tell me to put my cart back, I dare you.
mpv-shot0001.jpg
 
Not sure what to tell you, I know it was linked earlier, but the first guy unholsters, points it in the air and racks it. And the cops basically say he was in his own truck and he didn't know what was going on, case closed, get fucked Cart Narc.
That's funny, but killing a retard over a magnet is what gets laws passed against self defense.
 
Back