Selecting a Despot for the Autism Thunderdome

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Why don’t you just close AT down? You’re asking for the impossible. The nature of pol sperging is you get polarised positions.
If you want this to work you need to cut down the reactions. The jammies should implement the “be nice” dictum.
The mods should do the following:

Advise posters if they are being a dick and gently admonish them for crap posts.
Aggressively threadban people being deliberately provocative and just wanting asspats.
Notify the moderator board immediately if anyone is making death/violence threats.

Gentle, timely preemptive intervention before things escalate is needed. This sort of board needs someone who has awareness of political theory, and who can advise the autists who shitpost the error of their ways.
 
Didn't bother looking at this thread since my last post in it, but I see someone got the nom.
Uhh, if those posts are representative of what you think represents the paranoia/rage problem that Thunderdome boards have, I can save you some time and just say you're not going to like that section of the website no matter what I do. I'm more focused on that stuff directed at other users, not people rudely expressing political opinions to the void.
Going by this post I hope to see what your grand unveiling is, because that's the kind of attitude I was hoping for from someone Null put up to the job. Grats, I suppose.
 
Let me be a staff member, I'm fucking super autistic
And I’d only abuse my hypothetical position to unban me from the Trump Enslavement Syndrome thread (assuming I had that power).

Null isn’t going to implement a waiting limit or a post quota to post in A&H. That’s ridiculous because then people will actively call him a fag for shitting on A&H.
You mean what he’s already been doing?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
What would be the advantage to turn people gay?

I believe the argument is that it's probably not a coincidence that the same people flipping out about how there are too many people on earth and we're destroying the climate are the same group of people pushing the megagaytroon agenda. So population control would matter a lot to them.

I eat paste though, so I'm probably not a reliable source of information.
 
I believe the argument is that it's probably not a coincidence that the same people flipping out about how there are too many people on earth and we're destroying the climate are the same group of people pushing the megagaytroon agenda. So population control would matter a lot to them.

I eat paste though, so I'm probably not a reliable source of information.
I feel like the whole "less people" argument is very fringe, even among environmental types. Stuff like switching from burning for electricity, not using ICE cars (or cars in general), and not destroying thousands of acres of natural habitat, would be better for the environment than "not having as many people".
 
I feel like the whole "less people" argument is very fringe, even among environmental types. Stuff like switching from burning for electricity, not using ICE cars (or cars in general), and not destroying thousands of acres of natural habitat, would be better for the environment than "not having as many people".
Tbh I don't really give a shit in some abstract sense how many people there are, I'd just prefer them as far away from me as they can possibly get. The further away, the more I like them.
 
I feel like the whole "less people" argument is very fringe, even among environmental types. Stuff like switching from burning for electricity, not using ICE cars (or cars in general), and not destroying thousands of acres of natural habitat, would be better for the environment than "not having as many people".

As the great philosopher Martin Luther Gandhi once said "¿Por que no los dos?"

Abortions, Homosexy, Troons, Destruction of the nuclear family, Climate extremism/alarmism, etc. all ideologically supported by the same group of people and all coincidentally lead to or straight out call for, fewer people. Maybe that's a coincidence, maybe it's not. But I think at least subconsciously there is a connection.
 
Really the best solution in my opinion would be to have more moderators in the political section than others and have a strong outline for what they need to handle so that responses could be quick. Mostly it would probably be coming in when a slap fight starts to go critical and deescalating it in a way that's clear they aren't taking sides and both/all parties are being told to calm down if they're at fault. The other thing is maybe having some kind of appeal process, which is benefitted from multiple moderators as then it's harder for a user to say it's just one biased mod that leans a certain way being biased.

But yea, the whole shitfest that happens in some of those threads probably also doesn't have a good solution and just needs constant attention as people can't help but invest their emotions into things that they have no control over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
Mostly it would probably be coming in when a slap fight starts to go critical and deescalating it in a way that's clear they aren't taking sides and both/all parties are being told to calm down if they're at fault.
No, they need to throw them knives and hand out shots of whiskey and start taking bets.
 
Let's be real here, the best user for the job is @Hollywood Hulk Hogan. He don't give AF, and having thunderdome run by the hulkster would be aesthetic.
I'll do it if @Null would give me permission to abuse my mod powers to fuck with the A&H spazes, but I don't expect him to nor would I blame him at all for not doing so
 
I'll do it if @Null would give me permission to abuse my mod powers to fuck with the A&H spazes, but I don't expect him to nor would I blame him at all for not doing so
I would 100% abuse the power that's why I'm only joking about being taken on. I really would edit slurs into every post I could get away with it because I find it hilarious.
 
I would 100% abuse the power that's why I'm only joking about being taken on. I really would edit slurs into every post I could get away with it because I find it hilarious.
Honestly I imagine if you really wanted to some kind of script could be made to replace random words in a post with a slur chosen from a pre-made list. Although with that said, automation could take the fun out of that idea though.
 
Back