US Senate Votes to Allow FBI to Look at Your Web Browsing History Without a Warrant - “Stop having too much fun on the Internet”, the US government proclaims

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...t-your-web-browsing-history-without-a-warrant (a)

The US Senate has voted to give law enforcement agencies access to web browsing data without a warrant, dramatically expanding the government’s surveillance powers in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The power grab was led by Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell as part of a reauthorization of the Patriot Act, which gives federal agencies broad domestic surveillance powers. Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Steve Daines (R-MT) attempted to remove the expanded powers from the bill with a bipartisan amendment.

But in a shock upset, the privacy-preserving amendment fell short by a single vote after several senators who would have voted “Yes” failed to show up to the session, including Bernie Sanders. 9 Democratic senators also voted “No,” causing the amendment to fall short of the 60-vote threshold it needed to pass.

“The Patriot Act should be repealed in its entirety, set on fire and buried in the ground,” Evan Greer, the deputy director of Fight For The Future, told Motherboard. “It’s one of the worst laws passed in the last century, and there is zero evidence that the mass surveillance programs it enables have ever saved a single human life.”

The vote comes at a time when internet usage has skyrocketed, with tens of millions of Americans quarantined at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Privacy advocates have warned for over a decade that allowing warrantless access to web search queries and browsing history allows law enforcement to easily crack down on activists, labor organizers, or anyone else the government deems a threat.

“Today the Senate made clear that the purpose of the PATRIOT Act is to spy on Americans, no warrants or due process necessary,” Dayton Young, director of product at Fight For the Future, told Motherboard. “Any lawmaker who votes to reauthorize the PATRIOT Act is voting against our constitutionally-protected freedoms, and there’s nothing patriotic about that.”

- End of Article -
This is some of the worst news I've heard today. Absolutely no one wants a fed to look through their computer, not a single person. Such a fucking mess.
 
Mitch Mcconnel is one of the most cunning of swamp creatures. He was there before Trump and he intends to be there after Trump. He fully intends to ride the tiger of the Trump Era, and the funny thing is he is doing it. Do not mistake his supposed loyalty to the President as actually believing in what Trump wants to do. He's loyal in so far as he knows that loyalty will keep him where he is. Never forget Senators have 6 year terms to the presidents 4 years, and powerful Senators like Mitch serve until they die.
Would that be more proof that Donald Trump is an opportunistic con man? He wants yes men around him. Mitch should've been the first to go.

And what would Trump do about this? Nothing. If anything, it'll give him leeway to monitor criticism against him. He boasts about "protecting freedom" and censorship but having the government monitor Internet usage is just as dangerous as Google doing that.

This is why net neutrality is very important to defend. If you give them an inch, they would certainly go a mile. The internet is one of the last beacons of free, open information and speech in the modern world. It's bad enough that corporations and mobs like to inconsistently regulate what people say or watch (which many right wingers like to mention). But are oblivious for when the government would want to do it because Republicans are doing it.

Fucking baby boomer government trying to control something they don't even understand.

And yes, @The Pink Panther, I said baby boomer again. If they want to make laws like this, they should follow them as well.

I'd love to see what they do behind closed doors.
 
Would that be more proof that Donald Trump is an opportunistic con man? He wants yes men around him. Mitch should've been the first to go.

And what would Trump do about this? Nothing. If anything, it'll give him leeway to monitor criticism against him. He boasts about "protecting freedom" and censorship but having the government monitor Internet usage is just as dangerous as Google doing that.

This is why net neutrality is very important to defend. If you give them an inch, they would certainly go a mile. The internet is one of the last beacons of free, open information and speech in the modern world. It's bad enough that corporations and mobs like to inconsistently regulate what people say or watch (which many right wingers like to mention). But are oblivious for when the government would want to do it because Republicans are doing it.

Fucking baby boomer government trying to control something they don't even understand.

And yes, @The Pink Panther, I said baby boomer again. If they want to make laws like this, they should follow them as well.

I'd love to see what they do behind closed doors.
Your black jesus started the trend with SOPA and internet kill switches in one of those large defense bills. It was inevitable as earlier stated when he destroyed libertarian style leftists or outright murdering them like he did to the Jewish co founder of Reddit.

Trump as I recall from earlier tweets before 2016 was the type of guy who believed video games cause violence and never campaigned on internet freedoms. And why would Trump get rid of Mitch when Mitch has been very useful to Trump. And he already admitted himself to be a opportunistic motherfucker anyways when he said that he used loopholes to pay less taxes or something because he could. No use crying over spilled milk on Trump.
 
screencapture-senate-gov-legislative-LIS-roll-call-lists-roll-call-vote-cfm-cfm-2020-05-13-22_...png
 
As a matter of fact, I wouldn't be surprised if cursed to hell Tony Robbins and Harvey Weinstein are wanting to seed my browser history with creepy shit then tell the gov that they were "surveilling me " but the whole time browbeating me for sex. You told me you'd do that on my thread didnt you faggots?
Your post is admissible in court


Is that right Tony, Harvey, and Donny? And Mitch?
 
All this talk about "draining the swamp", yet there are still members that remain.

What happened to term limits?

At the end of the day, the Senate literally has to vote to give itself term limits. Some Senators are for it, but never enough. Trump literally can do nothing about that except try to get Senators who share his thinking on that elected. However, he can't do it while undercutting his own party, because that will result in Dems winning it all.

Surely you can understand this basic calculus without trying to inject more of your TDS into this.
 
Last edited:
And this is how you know libertarians are absolute frauds at the best of times.

EDIT: Wait no, we are both idiots! that was a yea on the AMENDMENT TO REMOVE!
...It seems in my efforts to own other people I have only owned myself. :fapcup:

Edit: But yeah, that makes way more sense; I was wondering why the Virginian reps made a sensible decision for once. That should have been a red flag.
 
That's an even bigger punch to the dick since they were off by 1. I wonder what the reason was for the 4 people not voting

It's really shocking that Sanders didn't vote.

Sasse we can understand why, he would have went NAY. But what is Sanders' excuse?

(Countdown until someone issues the theory he did it because the FBI has tried to investigate his wife before and he has that axe over his head...)
 
>2 NY Democrats voted yes
>No one from NY voted no
Can't say I'm surprised, but seriously, fuck my state.


EDIT: X Prime cleared things up, my state did good for once.
And this is how you know libertarians are absolute frauds at the best of times.

EDIT: Wait no, we are both idiots! That was a yea on the amendment to remove the FBI's power to surveil without a warrant.

The "NAYS" are the assholes here!
Wait I am confused, I thought the guys voting YES are the ones trying to remove the ability for gubmint to spy on people?
 
Back