Share your thoughts about listening to the Carlson Putin interview

"Zelensky is literally Hitler"
"Putin is literally Hitler"

This is the level of discourse, it's 2024 and everyone is still obsessed with the nazis. If Hitler didn't exist, they'd have to invent him.
The only other people in the world who sperg out about nazis as hard as Putin and his government are Jews, Germans and champagne communists. What refined company to have.

The interview I found pretty boring, I'm glad it happened because I don't think Putin deserves to be censored nor do I agree with the fucking retarded proposal to sanction Tucker for doing it, but it wasn't a very good interview. Too much of a power imbalance as is common with Putin on the scene. He's a good speaker but the need for translation dulls his delivery and he clearly wanted to just tell his long story about how Russia has existed since the era of Pangaea and therefore has a historical claim to rule the world or something.
 
"Zelensky is literally Hitler"
"Putin is literally Hitler"

This is the level of discourse, it's 2024 and everyone is still obsessed with the nazis. If Hitler didn't exist, they'd have to invent him.
Their fashion was just that good
I didn't know Putin was a history sperg, what 4x map game do you think he plays?
He quit playing chess the moment he got beat in Ukraine by the West in the game for influence, tossing chessboard aside and escalating to a fistfight like a gopnik monkey he is.
 
Instead, it's a minor regional power at best and Putin just looks like a Boomer fool.
It's true the Russian armed forces aren't nearly the strength of the Red Army at the height of the Cold War, but it doesn't need to be. A few years ago, NATO inspectors and analysts conducted an in-depth assessment of Germany's military capabilities. They found mighty Germany was lying regarding its percentage-of-GDP commitment to defense spending, which everyone suspected anyway. In terms of ground capabilities, the Germans, it turned out, could only field a single armored brigade--a skeleton brigade even then since fully a quarter of those tanks required unavailable spare parts. Germany is very likely representative of our NATO allies in toto, with the possible exception of Poland. If the balloon goes up and Poland doesn't hold, the rest of the EU folds in a few weeks, tops.

Not saying the Russians would win, but if China made its play for Taiwan and Iran activated its terror cells in the US all at the same time, we're in for a very bad day.
 
American brains short circuit when a politician gives long, thought-out answers instead of swinging a chainsaw around or calling out Sleepy Joe's dementia. Tucker repeated every question several times because he couldn't understand basic hints.
'-That guy isn't a spy, so why don't you just let him go?'
'-He was purchasing classified information. Our secret service is talking to their American colleagues trying to come to an agreement. You know, there is a Russian patriot currently serving a sentence in a European country...'
'-Ok, but that guy isn't a spy, so why don't you just let him go?'
Would've been funny if trying to negotiate with American politicians wasn't exactly like this.
 
Boring is fuck, also boring as fuck. Nothing that we haven't heard for 10+ years, the same "wanna hear what happened in Ice Age age?'" or "wanna know what bullshit history book written by my random kholop I have read?" or "listen to my sperg on tranny toilets" or "nazi are everywhere dude", hell even twitter libshits sperg about nazi less. The man is fucking old and should go babysit his grandkinds instead roleplay the new version of Romanov. The only good thing were Tucker's reaction faces, true meme material.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Lemmingwiser
I still have to watch the last 30 min of the interview, but so far I was most interested by the part where Putin was explaining about the backfiring economic effect of US/Western sanctions and how it is damaging the US dollar's supremacy as the reserve currency for the global trade and finance.

The history lesson part was not so interesting, but he did keep it a lot shorter and more concise than the long-form essays he has published in the past on the same subject. Though I think it will still be largely incomprehensible to the Amerifat audience of Tucker's content.
 
People have, indeed, genuinely gotten dumber over the last 8 years if they actually believe any of the words coming out of Vladimir Putin of all people. Carlson is the same breed of contrarian western vatnik faggot as CRP, Cernovich, and Jackson Hinkle, supposed American conservative hyper-"patriots" who'll bend the knee and suck Putin's cock to pwn the libz.

Putin's entire history lesson is a bullshit justification that would basically give Russia the right to conquer Alaska, and Spain and Portugal the right to own the Americas again if applied universally. He intentionally omits the agency of the Ukrainian people as a way to pin Ukraine's refusal to be conquered as being some kind of mind trick played upon them by western forces thousands of miles away.

It's the same Soviet memberberries LARP bullshit from one of the most evil men in modern history that has unfortunately became the new banner for all conservative internet grifters to unite under, because contrarianism is the only way their brains can function. They have to reflexively oppose everything the libs support, even if they initially supported Ukraine when the war broke out.

The contrarianism has gotten so out of hand you have people like SARAH PALIN of all people coming out to bat for Putin.
View attachment 5706489
If you want to know exactly why Obama won by so much, it wasn't just the ObamaMania, it was also thanks in no small part to McCain tying this brainless millstone of a woman around his neck.

There's so many posts about how the "MSM" is "quaking in their boots" from RW twitter over this supposedly groundbreaking interview, as if Putin's some kind of hyper-censored obscure figure, and not the Head of State of the largest country in the world, with full access to his country's media networks. All this fanfare for a 2 hour history lesson with talking points you've already heard from every other Russian sympathizer on the airwaves. Feh.
You're right, but you wasted your time typing all that out.
 
If you have a hateboner for Putin youre a faggot who needs to get a grip. Our enemy is our own government, like him or not the existential threat of Russia keeps our government from raping the entire world and causing rapefugees to flood in from every last corner of the globe. If Russia falls we'll be flooded by millions of nigger tier Gopniks who will move into Black nieghborhoods and become the Euro version of spics. Thats why I hope Russia wins, I dont wanna deal with Euro-niggers or any kind of nigger that would flee to America in the event of Russias defeat, considering Russia feeds Africa practically.
 
Last edited:
If you have a hateboner for Putin youre a faggot who needs to get a grip. Our enemy is our own government, like him or not the existential threat of Russia keeps our government from raping the entire world and causing rapefugees to flood in from every last corner of the globe. If Russia falls we'll be flooded by millions of nigger tier Gopniks who will move into Black nieghborhoods and become the Euro version of spics. Thats why I hope Russia wins, I dont wanna deal with Euro-niggers or any kind of nigger that would flee to America in the event of Russias defeat, considering Russia feeds Africa practically.

I think about this sometimes, but then I realize that I really don't like russians and their niggery ways either. It's 60s russia propaganda that opened the floodgates in the first place.
 
  • People are taken aback by a leader that doesn’t act like a buffoon and/or read from a list of talking points drafted by the World Economic Forum. That makes for a lot of chapped asses here because they so desperately wanted buffoonery to validate their viewpoints.
  • Putin was never going to give anything juicy to Tucker because why would he? Once again people here seem to think all discourse needs to resemble a Xitter slapfight.
  • Putin is pro-Russia? Holy shit, there are some fuckin’ geniuses here. Then again, we’re used to globohomo puppets who endlessly shit all over their own countries that a leader in favor of their own country causes sputtering.
The interview was okay and exactly what you’d expect from two people who are ultimately diametrically opposed to each other’s viewpoints. People who were expecting some sick pwnz or a slapfight were the real losers here. Having said that, Tucker was a lot more professional than Megyn Kelly who got slapped around by Putler because she was hoping for a soundbite slam dunk on him and miserably failed. I give the interview a C but the butthurtedness it created an A+.
 
the existential threat of Russia keeps our government from raping the entire world and causing rapefugees to flood in from every last corner of the globe
Nigger what? The southern border is wide open and they're already pouring in.
Screen-Shot-2021-09-17-at-11.55.56-AM-1024x623.png
 
I thought it was funny that Putin remembered a thousand years of Russian history but forgot when he last spoke to Joe Biden because he's a very busy man. Is "I don't remember" a polite lie in idiomatic Russian?
 
I thought it was funny that Putin remembered a thousand years of Russian history but forgot when he last spoke to Joe Biden because he's a very busy man. Is "I don't remember" a polite lie in idiomatic Russian?
I think its a subtle way of insulting braindead biden by making it seems that he is not worth remembering.
Which I wholeheartedly agree as that meat puppet is not worth remembering.
 
He's obviously not throwing softball questions or acting as a propagandist, he's just not a great interviewer. Putin isn't interested in answering concisely anyway.
I've found Tucker is a pretty decent interviewer, if you are interested in the person being interviewed. Most Tucker lets them talk and asks a probing question or two. He even tried this with Putin, with the "if all this is so important, why did you wait so long to do it" or whatever it was, paraphrasing there. Those methods would have been good for a much longer interview, which Putin seemed down for, but Tucker wasn't for some fucking reason. I think he wanted some soundbites and viral clips out of this, I don't think he was as interested in listening to putin give long thought out answers. If anything after listening to this twice, I'm sort of let down by Tucker's actions in all this. He deserves some mockery for being handled so easily, and that's not going to suit him well long term. One of the rare missteps by tucker in the past few years.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Feline Supremacist
I've found Tucker is a pretty decent interviewer, if you are interested in the person being interviewed. Most Tucker lets them talk and asks a probing question or two. He even tried this with Putin, with the "if all this is so important, why did you wait so long to do it" or whatever it was, paraphrasing there. Those methods would have been good for a much longer interview, which Putin seemed down for, but Tucker wasn't for some fucking reason. I think he wanted some soundbites and viral clips out of this, I don't think he was as interested in listening to putin give long thought out answers. If anything after listening to this twice, I'm sort of let down by Tucker's actions in all this. He deserves some mockery for being handled so easily, and that's not going to suit him well long term. One of the rare missteps by tucker in the past few years.
You can tell how great Putin is at negotiating and talking though. He immediately put Carlson on the backfoot with "is this a show or serious conversation" and then again later by suggesting he's a glowie.

Personally I also think the 'history lesson' was a powerplay to see how much Tucker would let him control the conversation. Not everything is 4d chess, so maybe not. But Putin seemed to study Carlson intently while he explained it.
 
Hugs and kisses to you too, homie.
:tomgirl:

I've found Tucker is a pretty decent interviewer, if you are interested in the person being interviewed. Most Tucker lets them talk and asks a probing question or two. He even tried this with Putin, with the "if all this is so important, why did you wait so long to do it" or whatever it was, paraphrasing there. Those methods would have been good for a much longer interview, which Putin seemed down for, but Tucker wasn't for some fucking reason. I think he wanted some soundbites and viral clips out of this, I don't think he was as interested in listening to putin give long thought out answers. If anything after listening to this twice, I'm sort of let down by Tucker's actions in all this. He deserves some mockery for being handled so easily, and that's not going to suit him well long term. One of the rare missteps by tucker in the past few years.
You can tell how great Putin is at negotiating and talking though. He immediately put Carlson on the backfoot with "is this a show or serious conversation" and then again later by suggesting he's a glowie.

Personally I also think the 'history lesson' was a powerplay to see how much Tucker would let him control the conversation. Not everything is 4d chess, so maybe not. But Putin seemed to study Carlson intently while he explained it.
I agree with all of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sammich
Both of them suck, but I trust Putin less to give a accurate a good interview. Take that as you will.
 
Back