Shit I actually need to recover from the mass deplatforming campaign

@Null: regarding the EU address and remailer, do you need any forwarding of physical parcels or is digital only enough?
Due to "Impressumspflicht" requiring a physical address to be posted for everything you publish in Germany (even e-books or blogs) quite a few services exist to keep your address and/or real name hidden while providing a full german mailing address.
Of course I have no personal experience how they handle complaints (at least one smaller company explicitly forbids authors of "religous or political" content) and most require you to have an EU-address or Passport.
 
null doesnt want to deal with the fallout when some insane retard blows you up with a mail bomb and you/your families try to sue us for being an 'employee',
I'm not disregarding that a physical PO box is a bad idea, but your reason is as flawed as claiming KF documenting or doxing in general has resulted in a rash of political murders offline.
The old "you won't do shit" addage so frequently shitposted with does apply to both sides. As much as the other half wants to do null harm, each too highly values their grubhub and private dilation time to ever risk a serious prison term. Anybody can wish someone harm and make empty threats. It's one in a billion in this day and age to go Uncle Ted.
 
I'll PL to the extreme and I'd be willing to help dear leader. He has no reason to trust me but I have a lot of reasons to trust him.

Disregard, I'm retarded.
 
Last edited:
Are there any other Kiwi friendly states or is it restricted to Wyoming?
There's plenty, honestly, and at this point staying in Wyoming is pointless. The point of incorporating in Delaware, Nevada, New Mexico, or Wyoming is that they allow you to register without publishing who owns the place (if a member-managed LLC) or who runs the place (if a manager-managed LLC). There are two-entity LLC structures that allow you to preserve your anonymity in a state that otherwise does not permit that, but that's a little beyond the scope of this discussion.... and more to the point it's all entirely pointless since everyone knows who runs this place anyway.

Ultimately, dude really needs a friendly attorney that will accept service of process and mail delivery. That's honestly the easiest way to do it. Still have no solution for phone service... good luck with that.
 
The cyberpunk lifestyle thread...

I am sure this is a naive question, and I suspect you'll reject this outright, but I'll ask this anyway: the impression I have, looking at this from the outside, is that ISPs/businesses drop you really quick because they don't know what they're up against or what to expect when agreeing to take you on. Have you considered telling a company, in advance and upon engaging them, that your site/business is so highly controversial and that they can expect a huge backlash at the moment? So that they can actually take steps on their end to anticipate the mass-abuse complaints that Liz & Co are constantly sending to them or the DDoS attacks? Perhaps have your lawyer explain this to a new prospective ISP/business instead of doing it yourself?

It seems to me (just is my impression as an outsider, so pardon is this is incorrect) like the reason you're getting dropped so quickly is because you go into these companies as if you were just another customer so as to not arouse suspicion, but then they get caught completely unaware by these attacks on you. All of a sudden, they get all these abuse e-mails an hour from Liz & Co, they're shocked and overwhelmed, and they begin to view you as a SNAFU. Perhaps they might get the feeling that you weren't being fully transparent with them from the start, and this would make them less likely to want to stand up for you. It might be better to be transparent about your predicament, the same way you have to disclose your medical history to an insurance company for them to consider you as a client. Make these ISPs feel like they are not being suckered into being your shield.

I get the whole argument about specialty services existing for the purpose of catering to unusual clients with special needs like yourself, but still, even they might appreciate an advance warning about exactly what to expect. I mean, you of all people have determined that net neutrality is a complete myth, so when you bring a certain "baggage" to an ISP, perhaps... tell them in advance? They won't be neutral towards you for sure, but perhaps they won't feel taken advantage of and this might make them more accommodating of you.
 
The cyberpunk lifestyle thread...

I am sure this is a naive question, and I suspect you'll reject this outright, but I'll ask this anyway: the impression I have, looking at this from the outside, is that ISPs/businesses drop you really quick because they don't know what they're up against or what to expect when agreeing to take you on. Have you considered telling a company, in advance and upon engaging them, that your site/business is so highly controversial and that they can expect a huge backlash at the moment? So that they can actually take steps on their end to anticipate the mass-abuse complaints that Liz & Co are constantly sending to them or the DDoS attacks? Perhaps have your lawyer explain this to a new prospective ISP/business instead of doing it yourself?

It seems to me (just is my impression as an outsider, so pardon is this is incorrect) like the reason you're getting dropped so quickly is because you go into these companies as if you were just another customer so as to not arouse suspicion, but then they get caught completely unaware by these attacks on you. All of a sudden, they get all these abuse e-mails an hour from Liz & Co, they're shocked and overwhelmed, and they begin to view you as a SNAFU. Perhaps they might get the feeling that you weren't being fully transparent with them from the start, and this would make them less likely to want to stand up for you. It might be better to be transparent about your predicament, the same way you have to disclose your medical history to an insurance company for them to consider you as a client. Make these ISPs feel like they are not being suckered into being your shield.

I get the whole argument about specialty services existing for the purpose of catering to unusual clients with special needs like yourself, but still, even they might appreciate an advance warning about exactly what to expect. I mean, you of all people have determined that net neutrality is a complete myth, so when you bring a certain "baggage" to an ISP, perhaps... tell them in advance? They won't be neutral towards you for sure, but perhaps they won't feel taken advantage of and this might make them more accommodating of you.
Proton sponsored mati for less than a month and he warned them. Fuck the Swiss.
 
Proton sponsored mati for less than a month and he warned them. Fuck the Swiss.
I wasn't aware of that. Perhaps they underestimated just how bad it was or was going to get?

How explicit are these advance warnings to prospective ISP? Not asking him to disclose or anything, just posing the question so that I can see what this looks like from the ISP's perspective.

Are advance warnings just: "hey, my site is a bit controversial, is that OK with you?" or very literally: "expect to be denounced all over social media and mainstream media for supporting terrorism & pedophilia, expect your wife to be targeted at her job, expect your upstream to be targeted, expect to end on The Spamhaus Project IP blacklist and other IP blacklists, expect to receive dozens of abuse e-mails (we know from Rekieta that Liz had 45 people sending out bar complaints, presumably a similar amount of not more are mailing abuse[at]someISP.com) and expect regular round the clock DDoS attacks"? Again, this is what it looks like to me looking at this from the outside. You can't just try to sneak into an ISP like a SNAFU when that's your baggage, no matter how "bullet-proof" they advertise themselves to be. They'll find out just how bad it actually is in the heat of the moment, feel suckered into being your shield and drop you.
 
1665494628053.png


 
My use is for 2FA and privacy. I have dual sim in my iPhone. I use eSIM so they don't need to ship a SIM card.

> I want recommendations for companies you actually use and have experience with.

My trap number is a prepaid line from eSIM Carrier in US https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT209096

When I need to pay, I get a text saying I have 3 days or I lose the number. I have had it for 3 months now. I'd prefer if it auto-renewed but I have been too lazy to figure out how.

In your case, I'd probably keep work/personal device separate. I understand not wanting a VOIP line. Like a cloud-hosted SIM card? Does that exist?

I don't know much about SIM and eSIM transfers so caveat emptor. I'm sorry to hear you're disabled like me and need voicemail transcripts.

- lolifarm
 
Andrew Tate's in the business of replatforming / expanding the altnet now. He & partners took Rumble public last week. He's now started his own licensed bank. I don't know if / when he'll get into hosting, but seems an obvious fit. His next thing is dropping on Nov 14, don't know what it is yet.
 
I've got a free TextNow burner number that works well for voice and text. Their underlying carrier (at least for my number) definitely isn't Bandwidth.com. They've got a $10/month paid plan that includes voicemail transcription amongst other things. Haven't tried the paid plan myself, so the transcripts could be shit, but overall their service has been good and it'd only take you $10 and a few minutes to see if you like it.
 
This is only partially true on VOIP.

The homing carrier is what will show up in a dip database on VOIP and these days 90% of the time it will just say Bandwidth.com

Most people who don't know the VOIP biz will assume that Bandwidth is running the equipment for that number but that's not how it works. If Bandwidth is the primary tandem they may refer tickets (which is what they did to Null) but on the smaller mom and pops that are behind another tandem like West they likely will only send a ticket if there is network abuse going on, because most of the time the tickets won't carryover since they all go thru email.

This gap in abuse management is exploited the fuck up by Indians who dump loads of scam calls on the network.
Bandwidth.com is the one who disconnected the number. They didn't send a ticket to Google, they just disconnected it. Presumably if there was a ticket or something somewhere, Google would have banned his account.

Maybe you could find out whatever service Pajeet scammers use for their VOIP services.
Scammers only need outbound calling, they can just make up a number for caller ID without ever exposing the carrier.
Null needs inbound, so the number (and therefore the carrier) has to be public.
 
We've used https://www.phone.com/ for about 8 years for a client that needs to refresh about 60 phone lines every quarter. You're billed by the account/user (depending on your plan) and can drop and pick up any US number from their pool any time for free, also have international numbers that are billed at a few bucks a month depending on location. It's a full VOIP service that has soft phones in browser, desktop application, or phone app, and you can set voicemail/transcription/number forwarding easily. Their customer service is 24/7 and pretty great, however we're also a premier account so can't speak for the normies. Feel free to DM me about any questions you have if they interest you Null
 
As agent/lawyer, why not drop Nick Turbo-Grifter Reikita a line? Wouldn't that be something he would be able to do? I am also sure he is really tired of the troon bullshit too.
As an extra bonus, any retarded troon complaints that they send to him he can use and laugh at in a livestream.
You and Nick split the superchats 50/50 ?
 
Back