- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
A-Stump said:It is somewhat funny of a stance, terribly ironic, but I don't have faith in him so much the power of desperation has on people. There is nothing so moving as being without something. It'll kick people into action. If a man is hungry enough for something he will do anything to get it. Hunger doesn't mean, necessarily, for food. He lost his hoarded junk and had a prime chance to buckle underneath of the pressure or rise above it. Irrelevant since folks will pay his lot in life.
The donation isn't going to "pay his lot in life." It's less than $1K, half of it basic supplies, and it'll run out quickly. It's a one time deal.
A-Stump said:I don't really how it has to do with the discussion. It's a topic which has more evolved to; 'Should Chris receive charity?' more so than the singular forum donation.
Then why are you even bringing it up? Other than the singular forum donation, he doesn't get charity, and no one is proposing that he does.