- Joined
- Aug 12, 2024
Polk is one of the most underrated American presidents in popular and academic consciousness. Many of the institutions and structures of America that we used to take for granted have an origin or refinement in his administration. Jefferson and Jackson would also be good choices in a less charged environment, and I personally have a soft spot for Coolidge.I can understand not wanting Lincoln to represent America because he's overdone at this point, but any 'American" who is sick of Teddy Roosevelt should have their citizenship revoked on the spot. Andrew Jackson is a good pick though since I don't think he's ever represented the United States in any strategy game. James K. Polk could also be a good choice for an expansionist and faith-based playstyle however that may be too much of a "who" for the average person.
You have to remember that 90% of the people who play these games don't care beyond a basic-bitch surface level about the actual history behind every civilization's leaders. They rely on the developers to tell them who is important.
That said, I don't want Lincoln to represent America because he's overdone, but because he's just an awful choice. Regardless of your opinion on the War between the States or whether he was a tyrant, if you suggested a leader for any other civilization whose ascension sparked the bloodiest war in its history, had his barely four-year administration entirely taken up by it, and then was assassinated before it could even be completely won, people would rightfully think you were trolling. Lincoln was a clever politician but any basic comparison between him and the sort of leaders who are usually chosen/proposed to represent civilizations is embarrassing. There's also the small matter that he only represents half of the civilization he's leading.
I disagree with this line of thought; games like these influence popular perception and awareness more than they are influenced by it. It's why there's such a big push to put female leaders and sub-saharan civilizations that had no alphabet, not even numerals, into them, and why there's a very large amount of people who now associate Gandhi with nuclear holocaust. If Civ VII chose to have Polk I guarantee you it would cause a small revival of popular interest in him both as a leader and as a person.That's exactly the problem. In a very narrowly focused game (like a lot of mods, Napoleonic Era for Age of Empires III had Jefferson for America as it fit the timeframe) it can work, but a Civ candidate needs to be a Big Personality. Nobody knows what Polk was like. i'm his number one advocate (I think there should be a Polk Monument in Washington DC) and I couldn't tell you what he was like.
Last edited by a moderator: