SJW Art and Extremes

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why does Tumblr have an obsession with vitiligo?

  • Suicide Girl model and America's Next Top Model contestant have it, spread on Tumblr, that's why.

    Votes: 667 16.2%
  • Stop fucking asking this this question.

    Votes: 480 11.6%
  • I swear to God I will start deleting these posts.

    Votes: 146 3.5%
  • Goddammit.

    Votes: 392 9.5%
  • ACTUALLY IT'S PART OF A DEEP FALSE-FLAG OPERATION TO TURN ALL BLACK PEOPLE WHITE.

    Votes: 2,439 59.2%

  • Total voters
    4,123
No. But by googling it I remember seen parts used as memes. Still, the maker of this webcomic used different backgrounds for different panels. For example, I've only seen three different backgrounds used by the one I posted about. But I guess I'm much too salty about that and should move on.
Check the "Art Review" section:
 
Why does Lois look like that? Why does Supes look like he came out of a western yaoi daujin? Why are they all in the nu She-Ra artstyle? Why does Supes look so awkward there?

It's explictly being produced by people who worked on shera and voltron so that's why it looks like those shows.

“My Adventures With Superman” is produced by Warner Bros. Animation. Sam Register (“Teen Titans Go!) executive produces with Jake Wyatt (“Invader Zim: Enter the Florpus”) and Brendan Clogher (“Voltron: Legendary Defender”) co-executive producing; Josie Campbell (“She-Ra and the Princesses of Power”) will co-produce."

Josie was writer on shera and Brendan was artist on voltron and shera. I'd also like to point the name of the show is "My adventures with Superman", which makes it sound like Lois is the protagonist of the story?

My main fears are that Clark will become a "shy uwu softboy" ("modern and relatable") while Lois will be shilled into marysuedom and there will be a gay love triangle between Clark/Lex/Superman because they know only shippers liked Voltron and shera.
 
Oh no what did they do to my son :(
D66D01AB-AB8E-4447-8AB4-F8968B3DAB67.jpeg
DC26D137-A202-4F98-BB44-D7CBA99491AB.jpeg
Edit: Fixed the original kek.
 
Last edited:
I'm always just shocked by some of the shows that manage to catch SJWs's eyes and get them to like them. But damn they truly did Master Shake dirty by making him look like he got Carl's body if Carl shaved and managled his chest.
I feel like some of them may be fake SJWs that don't actually believe in the stupid shit but want so desperately to be popular on the internet that they kowtow to making terrible art to get likes. The rest of them probably see a series and think "I COULD MAKE THIS BETTER".
 
I feel like some of them may be fake SJWs that don't actually believe in the stupid shit but want so desperately to be popular on the internet that they kowtow to making terrible art to get likes. The rest of them probably see a series and think "I COULD MAKE THIS BETTER".
I'd rather go forever unnoticed than to ever pander to SJWs. I would like to have a non-volatile reputation, thanks.
 
Not exactly SJW art but superman is getting a new HBO cartoon and Jimmy Olsen was blackwashed once more. Gingers are a dying breed in western tv.


View attachment 2184970

BTW that's Lois Lane in the middle. I dont blame you if you thought that was Luz from Owlhouse or whoever. I guess she will be the "wacky energetic tomboy" of the show.
Ngl, when I saw this screenshot I thought it was a gay guy in the middle. I hope she won't become an enby.
 
Remember when cartoons were the opposite of this, remember Rob Liefield?
We mocked him for his overly veiny macho characters like Cable and his bimbos with 8 inch waists but look where we are now.
At least we could tell which characters were male and which were female.
 
Saw this on Instagram and it's hideous. The Monster High fandom loves retconning/headcanonns that make no sense other than the sake of "diversity".
Honestly, the fact that a "Monster High fandom" that is not entirely composed of 8-11 year old girls exists is bad enough by itself.
 
Back