- Joined
- May 24, 2020
I guess part of it is their desire to "stand out" from the rest of the decently visually appealing to greatly visually appealing by instead choosing to make something atrocious, but then they get lost in their own self-made mess of everyone having shit tier art and no one standing out either.I am also new here also after lurking for about a year, welcome.
What I want to know is why so many of these "artist" have an "art style" that is just utter shit and unappealing to look at. The vast majority ignore anatomy by making some physical features exaggerated in size, often with sloppy line work and questionable color choices.
The other part of it is that making things visually appealing takes effort and patience. And I would assume that a good chunk of these people genuinely do not have interest in art itself outside of using it to farm clout & asspats & attention from others-- drawing for the algorithm, leading to their art looking soulless and ingenuine, because they didn't even like it in the first place. Leading to no effort, making excuses for said lack of effort, even regressing in some cases because they try to appeal to everyone at once & still end up being cannibalized by their own kind in the Oppression Olympics + perma-cancelled cancel culture.
Oh, and you gotta justify why all your art looks like shit, apparently. So let's throw in some "UWU I LITERALLY CANT DRAW GOOD OR PUT IN EFFORT TO DRAW GOOD BECAUSE I HAVE UHH UHHH AUTISM AND ADHD IM ALSO A BLACK TRANSMASC LESBIAN NONBINARY CATGENDER NEURODIVERGENT MINOR REEEE UWU IF U CRITCIZE ME UR ABLEIST"