Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dude, that ship sailed a long ass time ago...

But I still want to know. Every single time I asked this question, it always gets blown over and the person will talk about their urges to have sex with 12 year olds or to fuck an animal, or to talk about the extermination of incels by the ancients.

This simple question is one that these people refuse to answer.
 
It's not just me that thinks that is it? I mean sometimes I tease these guys about it but really? Like I can't be the only one that thinks some of the shit they do is gay.

Edit: Just a note I'm gay and trans and I think this shit is incredibly gay. Like I dress as a female and I have a dick and I'm like "Nigga you gay". That's how blatant it is.
Beyond the male models on every page and members insisting on posting their dicks in the rate me threads, one of the SlutHate moderators has Jack Radcliffe as his avatar. Jack Radcliffe is a gay porn actor in his 50s.

I mean, c'mon. If it's not obvious at this point to anyone, they're dense. I'm just baffled at how the members of SlutHate hand-wave it saying they just admire what they want to become; it's like they don't have any awareness of just how closeted they seem.

I've also noticed that more than half the rate me threads aren't even about the initial poster, just random guys they want rated ...
 
one of the Mad Virgins (in the kiwi megathread) tried to cite a bunch of sources without actually reading them
leincelgenious.png

the first link is about self-perceived attractiveness and found that "Thinking that one is attractive increases the tendency to support inequality"

the second is the only one of the three that comes close to supporting what he is claiming. it found that "disagreeable and physically unattractive employees received more CWB [Counterproductive Work Behaviour] from their coworkers". I'd have to look into the specifics of the study to see if it actually supports the claim about bullying.

the third link found that unattractive candidates received less votes, however, politically unpopular parties were represented by unattractive people. In other words it doesn't actually give any meaningful results.

TLDR= dumb virgins are dumb, we already knew that.

Edit: resulting upset
nice.png
 
Last edited:
https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/leincelgenious-png.20776/

His post count and join date are what stands out to me. He's made 4297 posts in the span of about 90 days. That rounds up to an average of 48 posts per day.

So either the SH forums are full of nothing but shitposts (which is true) or this bullets character never leaves the internet (also probably true).
 
Honestly, the most horrifying thing about these guys is that kernel of truth in their arguments. I don't know if I'm going insane or something for seeing the value in their website going past all the hyperbolic arguments based on butthurt personal experiences.

People are always judged to varying extent by other people based on their physical appearances. The problem is when they believe that it is all there is to get and maintain a stable relationship. These guys seem to be unable to understand that emotional as well as physical compatibility are important for long term relationships.

It seems like the crux of their arguments is that people prejudge other people that are considered uglier within modern society and are thus objectively less likely to get the opportunities than people that are considered more attractive who will have to work less to take advantage of those opportunities. Those people who are unfairly misjudged on appearance will ultimately have to work more to gain those opportunities. Because of the prejudice against them, they may also become more introverted as a result, resulting in a viscous feedback loop with the possibility of creating developmental problems as the person grows that exacerbates their social problems further.

What do you guys personally think about this?
 
Honestly, the most horrifying thing about these guys is that kernel of truth in their arguments. I don't know if I'm going insane or something for seeing the value in their website going past all the hyperbolic arguments based on butthurt personal experiences.

People are always judged to varying extent by other people based on their physical appearances. The problem is when they believe that it is all there is to get and maintain a stable relationship. These guys seem to be unable to understand that emotional as well as physical compatibility are important for long term relationships.

It seems like the crux of their arguments is that people prejudge other people that are considered uglier within modern society and are thus objectively less likely to get the opportunities than people that are considered more attractive who will have to work less to take advantage of those opportunities. Those people who are unfairly misjudged on appearance will ultimately have to work more to gain those opportunities. Because of the prejudice against them, they may also become more introverted as a result, resulting in a viscous feedback loop with the possibility of creating developmental problems as the person grows that exacerbates their social problems further.

What do you guys personally think about this?
Eh... kinda. Some become introverted and others can overcome it through having talent or being generally cool people. It varies from person to person, and there is no doubt a stigma for people considered to have a lower standard of beauty. However I don't really think it's overly important and any skew is all together pretty minuscule. While looks can come into play and be a factor I don't think it to be a determining one.
 
Honestly, the most horrifying thing about these guys is that kernel of truth in their arguments. I don't know if I'm going insane or something for seeing the value in their website going past all the hyperbolic arguments based on butthurt personal experiences.

People are always judged to varying extent by other people based on their physical appearances. The problem is when they believe that it is all there is to get and maintain a stable relationship. These guys seem to be unable to understand that emotional as well as physical compatibility are important for long term relationships.

It seems like the crux of their arguments is that people prejudge other people that are considered uglier within modern society and are thus objectively less likely to get the opportunities than people that are considered more attractive who will have to work less to take advantage of those opportunities. Those people who are unfairly misjudged on appearance will ultimately have to work more to gain those opportunities. Because of the prejudice against them, they may also become more introverted as a result, resulting in a viscous feedback loop with the possibility of creating developmental problems as the person grows that exacerbates their social problems further.

What do you guys personally think about this?
Of course there's a few kernels of truth in their arguments, but they've reached a point where they treat physical appearance like a number's game and use it to excuse toxic behavior towards both men and women.
 
Honestly, the most horrifying thing about these guys is that kernel of truth in their arguments. I don't know if I'm going insane or something for seeing the value in their website going past all the hyperbolic arguments based on butthurt personal experiences.

It's not horrifying, actually. All extremist views stem from some real-world instigation. That's usually how people get pulled into such causes. They identify with that kernel of truth but soon get swept up in the radicalism.

People are always judged to varying extent by other people based on their physical appearances. The problem is when they believe that it is all there is to get and maintain a stable relationship. These guys seem to be unable to understand that emotional as well as physical compatibility are important for long term relationships.

The prevailing impression I get from these guys is that they have no idea what they want. Most of them don't appear to even be attracted to women; it's just something that they've convinced themselves they want. So, instead of addressing these two points directly they latch onto the easiest answer. One that just so happens to also play into the personal insecurity required of all Love Shys.

When everything is wrapped up in appearance they never have to admit wrongdoing or face their personal flaws. They can blame it on genetics or women ignoring them because both are outside their control. The moment they say "maybe I'm the problem" is when their fragile self esteem comes crashing down.

It seems like the crux of their arguments is that people prejudge other people that are considered uglier within modern society and are thus objectively less likely to get the opportunities than people that are considered more attractive who will have to work less to take advantage of those opportunities. Those people who are unfairly misjudged on appearance will ultimately have to work more to gain those opportunities. Because of the prejudice against them, they may also become more introverted as a result, resulting in a viscous feedback loop with the possibility of creating developmental problems as the person grows that exacerbates their social problems further.

This just ties back into their inability to admit personal fault. Their entire world view is dependent upon humans treating pretty people as worth more than ugly people. If that's not true then they lose their ability to blame all their failings upon appearance/women and instead have to look inward for the answers.
 
When everything is wrapped up in appearance they never have to admit wrongdoing or face their personal flaws. They can blame it on genetics or women ignoring them because both are outside their control. The moment they say "maybe I'm the problem" is when their fragile self esteem comes crashing down.
Definitely true for many members.
However... some of us have gone that route, and found our looks to be a major obstacle, sadly.
 
I wonder what these people think about gay people.

I would imagine they have a very open and considerate view of them with lots of respect and consideration for the minutia of LGBT dynamics
 
Definitely true for many members.
However... some of us have gone that route, and found our looks to be a major obstacle, sadly.

Appearance is not the be-all-end-all to happiness, and treating it as such will lead you down a never ending path of insecurity. You know how you become more comfortable with your appearance? You become more comfortable with who you are as a person. There's a lot more to your looks than physical traits. An average person who takes care of themselves and exudes confidence will stand out more than the self-deprecating super model. I've seen it happen before.

I wonder what these people think about gay people.

I would imagine they have a very open and considerate view of them with lots of respect and consideration for the minutia of LGBT dynamics

One of them told me I'm gay because I was raped as a child. This is the first I've heard of any kind of sexual abuse in my childhood (or any point in my life, really).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back