Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
CatParty said:
LOLOLOLOL

iePkgCP.png
Click to expand...
I'm sure his mental problems and warped thinking has nothing to do with him not getting laid. I'm also sure he also doesn't smell, stare, ramble and act squirrely around the opposite sex.

Guvking normie. :spudking:
 
Shidoshi said:
So alienfranco you've left SH, but do you still believe in the concept of red & blue pill?

Or do these not exist?
Click to expand...
I believe in the concepts of red & blue pill. But sluthate greatly under-rates the S (status) component of LMS (looks, money, status). There are tons of ugly guys who get laid. Most people in the west are serial monogamists. Women are not content with being part of Chad's harem. The problem with sluthate is that they look at POF, OKCupid, Tinder and the night clubs/bar scene. They notice that the girls are more picky in that environment but they overlook the fact that it is a sausage fest and this is why they are picky. And they seem to think that it's like that everywhere. No, dudes are more likely to have an online dating account because it's easier to approach a girl online than to approach at a house party. Plain and simple.

Online dating shouldn't replace going to house parties, hanging out at school events, hanging out with co-workers, hanging out with friends, etc. But it's one of the avenues that men like to pursue because it doesn't take much investment to message a random single girl with "hey". And the reason why women typically expect you to write 1-2 sentences with substance and originality with online dating is because there is so much oversaturation of penis on these sites that you really need to stand out from the crowd as a guy to get replies.

Women are not the pursuers. They don't bother with online dating unless they aren't meeting the right guys in their day-to-day life.

Propinquity theory is legit. I remember reading a post on a forum for expectant mothers where the poster mentioned that in her workplace there was a group of 10-12 colleagues and 8 of them paired off and got married.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Shidoshi
@Dove do you think you will pass away as a tearful virgin, alone in your bed? Or will you go out in a blaze of faggotry like Elliot Rodgers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duke Nukem
supdup said:
No, it isn't. The member base of SH is not even a blip on the radar of internet users.
Click to expand...
This only proves your lack of any reasoning and debating skills. My claim was never that SH is a large part of the internet. You do know that there are many incels who don't post on incel sites, eh? My point was simply that SH has a lot of users who completely fit the sickening modern culture and are still incel. So that plus the fact that I met many incels who weren't aware of the term at the moment is what brings me to this conclusion, based on inductive reasoning.

supdup said:
This proves your perception of what is "reasonable" is highly unreliable.
Click to expand...
I will give you one thing, Diamond Jack - I am not quite familiar with umad's ideas and jumped the gun on that. But from what I've read from OmegaKV his views on prime age of women, life being basically about access to women and rape (if it was him on this last issue) are absolutely reasonable and anybody sane (sadly, not the majority) will see him and me as reasonable and you as an oversocialized deranged person who'd believe that the age of consent should be 40 if only the society claimed so.

supdup said:
Just going to leave this here. The kettle is black.
Click to expand...
Yes, because just this post alone proves how strong your arguments are. They're based on fallacies and claims that defy basic human nature/sexuality due to a liberal dogma.
 
  • Deviant
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
Holden is a lot better at writing in English than when he first joined. I think you've picked up the language over the course of your ten thousand fucking posts here.

Holden said:
But from what I've read from OmegaKV his views on prime age of women, life being basically about access to women and rape (if it was him on this last issue) are absolutely reasonable and anybody sane (sadly, not the majority) will see him and me as reasonable and you as an oversocialized deranged person who'd believe that the age of consent should be 40 if only the society claimed so.
Click to expand...
It's true that a woman's eggs are not replenished as she ages, and as a result the older a woman is the more likely her children will have defects. You could say that a girl's reproductive prime is immediately after she begins puberty. The problem is that a 14 year old girl is basically a child with a woman's body, and preying on them is psychotic. You (hopefully) cannot emotionally relate to a child with tits, but it's very easy for a grown man to seduce young girls, especially with alcohol or other things they have no experience with.

Children were married off at this age because it's essentially the best age for producing a heir to the family name, especially at a time with 80% infant mortality, but we as a society and as a species have progressed pass that. I'm not denying what you're saying, I'm just claiming you're missing the forest for the trees or for the bush.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DuskEngine, Ti-99/4A, Dynamite Ninja and 8 others
Null said:
I think you've picked up the language over the course of your ten thousand fucking posts here.


The problem is that a 14 year old girl is basically a child with a woman's body, and preying on them is psychotic. Y
Click to expand...
I guess these two sentences kinda describe what you're all about. One is nonsense, as who teaches any language can tell you, the other is a "it's just so" claim that makes sex into something you need to be smart and mature for, which is nonsense and merely liberal conditioning.

Which is why you're running this place the way you do - like that North Korean guy, only twice as delusional.
 
  • Dumb
  • Feels
Reactions: Ti-99/4A, Dynamite Ninja, Scribbler and 2 others
Null said:
Holden is a lot better at writing in English than when he first joined. I think you've picked up the language over the course of your ten thousand fucking posts here.


It's true that a woman's eggs are not replenished as she ages, and as a result the older a woman is the more likely her children will have defects. You could say that a girl's reproductive prime is immediately after she begins puberty. The problem is that a 14 year old girl is basically a child with a woman's body, and preying on them is psychotic. You (hopefully) cannot emotionally relate to a child with tits, but it's very easy for a grown man to seduce young girls, especially with alcohol or other things they have no experience with.

Children were married off at this age because it's essentially the best age for producing a heir to the family name, especially at a time with 80% infant mortality, but we as a society and as a species have progressed pass that. I'm not denying what you're saying, I'm just claiming you're missing the forest for the trees or for the bush.
Click to expand...
Seriously FUCKING THANK YOU!
I've been trying to explain the difference between physical and mental maturity for ages, let alone the fact that the age of consent isn't based on biology but instead to protect naive, inexperienced children from perverted older adults and been brick walled the whole time, it was driving me crazy! Seriously, how hard is it to understand that you don't stick your dick in a kid too young to even know what to do with it?!


Holden said:
I guess these two sentences kinda describe what you're all about. One is nonsense, as who teaches any language can tell you, the other is a "it's just so" claim that makes sex into something you need to be smart and mature for, which is nonsense and merely liberal conditioning.
Click to expand...
Case in point.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja and HickoryDickory
Holden said:
I guess these two sentences kinda describe what you're all about. One is nonsense, as who teaches any language can tell you, the other is a "it's just so" claim that makes sex into something you need to be smart and mature for, which is nonsense and merely liberal conditioning.

Which is why you're running this place the way you do - like that North Korean guy, only twice as delusional.
Click to expand...
Writing >10,000 posts in English (and reading a similar number in reply) is virtually guaranteed to improve language skills in a non-native speaker.

Source: I am a qualified English teacher
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja, Scribbler, DuskEngine and 1 other person
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back