Sluthate.com

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
It doesn't matter anyway, who the fuck is attracted to a BIRD? Lmfao. Maybe birds. I can go attract some seagulls at the beach.

@the personality point: it's changable to an extent but it's mainly faked. It's not the 'real' you, which is genetically predetermined and is also heavily influenced by how you look. Your looks≈your personality (how others perceive you based on how you look is absolutely HUGE). If you aren't confident with how you look, game over.

People are attracted to Steve Bucemi. It's not how you look but how you carry yourself that makes you attractive. Look man, if you posit that an 'average guy' is 50% attractiveness, that means that the other fifty are still capable of being attractive somehow.

Genes do matter, yes. I won't deny that. But your case is mostly you setting barriers for yourself. You deny even the possibility of non-surgical improvement, and that's your problem. Hell, I have a friend who looks like a beached walrus, and he gets more women than he knows what to do with.

Ohh my friend you would be surprised.

Way off-topic. Hatoful Boyfriend >.>
 
idk this guy has a point, few people talk about the objective rating system that the 3.5 billion women in the world unanimously agree on + how it affects men's lives

Why are people "agreeing" with this post? We know there is subjectivity, obviously, but there's also some degree of objectivity involved:

pierce-brosnan-james-bond-per-la-morte-puo-attendere.jpeg


6p68wzn.jpg


You're talking as if 50% of women would prefer the second guy or something... But the very vast majority will obviously prefer the appearance of Brosnan.

In this day and age it is not at all difficult to improve your appearance so it makes no sense why anybody would just sit back and be content with looking awful.

See, but you can work on your personality. It's not a fixed thing. If it's not very good, FUCKIN CHANGE IT.

Why is it seen as okay to change your personality but not your appearance? If anything, personality is more a part of who you are than your physical appearance is, yet it's seen as wrong to every think of fixing physical flaws. Also people seem to pretend looks is 100% subjective with absolutely zero objectivity involved whatsoever (see above) but personality is apparently just completely objective.
 
It just got worse. There are actual pedophiles on sluthate.com and the more I read into it, the more it seems to be some kind of pedo forum.

http://sluthate.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=71288

Could we get this place shutdown?

If you're a man and you're not attracted to 14-16 year olds, there is something mentally fucked up with you, not the other way around. 14-16 is a girl's prime - no age of consent law can change that.
 
Last edited:
Why is it seen as okay to change your personality but not your appearance? If anything, personality is more a part of who you are than your physical appearance is, yet it's seen as wrong to every think of fixing physical flaws. Also people seem to pretend looks is 100% subjective with absolutely zero objectivity involved whatsoever (see above) but personality is apparently just completely objective.

Here's the objective question to whether or not you should change your personality.

Is who you are helping you? Is it making you happy?

If not, changing may be in your best interest. "I am who I am" is the stuff of cowards. We always change, every day and every moment. Every experience changes us. By refusing to change or adapt, you're blocking yourself, with nothing but your own stubbornness to blame.

If you're a man and you're not attracted to 14-16 year olds, there is something mentally fucked up you, not the other way around. 14-16 is a girl's prime - no age of consent law can change that.

I think I'll just be fucked up, thanks. I consider it a badge of honor.
 
Why are people "agreeing" with this post? We know there is subjectivity, obviously, but there's also some degree of objectivity involved:

pierce-brosnan-james-bond-per-la-morte-puo-attendere.jpeg


6p68wzn.jpg


You're talking as if 50% of women would prefer the second guy or something... But the very vast majority will obviously prefer the appearance of Brosnan.

In this day and age it is not at all difficult to improve your appearance so it makes no sense why anybody would just sit back and be content with looking awful.



Why is it seen as okay to change your personality but not your appearance? If anything, personality is more a part of who you are than your physical appearance is, yet it's seen as wrong to every think of fixing physical flaws. Also people seem to pretend looks is 100% subjective with absolutely zero objectivity involved whatsoever (see above) but personality is apparently just completely objective.

Dr Steve Brule is a god!
 
Well...look on the bright side. At least this Loveshy doesn't want to screw 12 year-olds.

12 is a little before a girl's prime, but there is nothing perverted about wanting to fuck a 12 year old. The age of consent in the US was 10 years old in many states until fairly recently. A 12 year old girl is mentally and physically mature enough to have sex with an older male. This was common knowledge until the 20th century. Edgar Allan Poe was in his late 20s when he married a 13 year old girl.
 
Here's the objective question to whether or not you should change your personality.

Is who you are helping you? Is it making you happy?

If not, changing may be in your best interest. "I am who I am" is the stuff of cowards. We always change, every day and every moment. Every experience changes us. By refusing to change or adapt, you're blocking yourself, with nothing but your own stubbornness to blame.

So our outlooks are not that different. Replace "personality" with "appearance" and this is our exact thoughts. Based on personal experiences we think appearance is a bigger determining factor in physical attraction. I improved my appearance a lot (I would have given my "before" self about a 2) and my sexual success increased directly with it, as well as the attractiveness of the women who found me attractive.

NGL I do find JonTron and Steve Buscemi attractive.

They are both adorable to me. :heart-full:

Also John C. Reilly is precious and I would snuggle with him over Pierce Brosnan.

Just curious, do you find them more attractive sexually, or as a cuddle-buddy? Here's another example. Someone has a gun to your head, if you get this question wrong they shoot you: Who do you bet more women find physically attractive:

hqdefault.jpg


francisco-lachowski-profile.jpg


If it was 100% subjective then it should be impossible to tell and a 50/50 gamble.
 
12 is a little before a girl's prime, but there is nothing perverted about wanting to fuck a 12 year old. The age of consent in the US was 10 years old in many states until fairly recently. A 12 year old girl is mentally and physically mature enough to have sex with an older male. This was common knowledge until the 20th century. Edgar Allan Poe was in his late 20s when he married a 13 year old girl.

How prime is she mentally? Have you seen a teen mother have a child?
Lets take a biological example: any dog breeder knows that you should never breed a bitch on it's first heats because they are mentally still pups and physically unable to carry a litter. If they have pups too young the mother and the pups are at risk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back