Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
umad said:
kiwifags flowchart:

say something edgy
get rekt by sluthate masterrace
get butthurt
reply with "salty1111!!111!!"
Click to expand...

Translation:

180px-Rawr_fag.jpg
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Simplicity111, Dumb Frogposter, Hi I Am From Page 6 and 6 others
Wolf Fetuses said:
That's photoshopped to 10/10 Sluthate standard though, so they all have the same jutty chin and Roman features. Booooring.
Click to expand...

The guy on the far right of the picture looks like a jock stud. I guess you could say that handsome features are "boring". For sure a man with a gigantic distorted nose and bulging wonky eye is more of a spectacle. There's more leeway for uglyness, whereas handsome features mostly conform to the same ideals. For hundreds of years people have been FASCINATED by ugliness, especially in the Victorian era. In times gone by people would pay good money to walk into a big carnival tent and stare at "freaks".

But you're in the vast majority if you are more sexually attracted to the guy on the left of this picture to the angular jock on the right. It's the same guy morphed, so obviously it won't look completely natural, but give us a bit of leeway:

44d06be0fd.png
 
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Simplicity111, Ti-99/4A, Dynamite Ninja and 7 others
Wolf Fetuses said:
Guys - let's stop sperging at @umad for a second to appreciate the fact that SLUTHATE HAD A MEETUP. :lol: All the chins are morphed. Even the other Incels are calling them out on the Photoshop.

ppZGYJF.jpg
Click to expand...
Why do they all look like they have really bad jaw fractures.... and why is one wearing pajama pants... and do they not know what to do with their hands? Even the clothes look poorly photoshopped....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yog-Spergoth, Derbydollar and GREEDY FIREMAN
MysteryMan said:
The guy on the far right of the picture looks like a jock stud. I guess you could say that handsome features are "boring". For sure a man with a gigantic distorted nose and bulging wonky eye is more of a spectacle. There's more leeway for uglyness, whereas handsome features mostly conform to the same ideals. For hundreds of years people have been FASCINATED by ugliness, especially in the Victorian era. In times gone by people would pay good money to walk into a big carnival tent and stare at "freaks".

But you're in the vast majority if you are more sexually attracted to the guy on the left of this picture to the angular jock on the right. It's the same guy morphed, so obviously it won't look completely natural, but give us a bit of leeway:

44d06be0fd.png
Click to expand...
I'm more attracted to the one on the left. The whole "Brock from Pokemon" look is kinda unnatural looking no matter how you do it. The one on the left needs to hold is head up straighter though. He's taking the picture at an angle that doesn't look the best. Also he looks high as fuck and that seems more chill. I feel the one on the right might try bludgeon me with something
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Meowthkip, Yog-Spergoth, Tookie and 1 other person
MysteryMan said:
The guy on the far right of the picture looks like a jock stud. I guess you could say that handsome features are "boring". For sure a man with a gigantic distorted nose and bulging wonky eye is more of a spectacle. There's more leeway for uglyness, whereas handsome features mostly conform to the same ideals. For hundreds of years people have been FASCINATED by ugliness, especially in the Victorian era. In times gone by people would pay good money to walk into a big carnival tent and stare at "freaks".

But you're in the vast majority if you are more sexually attracted to the guy on the left of this picture to the angular jock on the right. It's the same guy morphed, so obviously it won't look completely natural, but give us a bit of leeway:

44d06be0fd.png
Click to expand...

A wizard is never early, nor is he late. He arrives precisely when he means to.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: redcent, Meowthkip, Yog-Spergoth and 3 others
MysteryMan said:
The guy on the far right of the picture looks like a jock stud. I guess you could say that handsome features are "boring". For sure a man with a gigantic distorted nose and bulging wonky eye is more of a spectacle. There's more leeway for uglyness, whereas handsome features mostly conform to the same ideals. For hundreds of years people have been FASCINATED by ugliness, especially in the Victorian era. In times gone by people would pay good money to walk into a big carnival tent and stare at "freaks".

But you're in the vast majority if you are more sexually attracted to the guy on the left of this picture to the angular jock on the right. It's the same guy morphed, so obviously it won't look completely natural, but give us a bit of leeway:

44d06be0fd.png
Click to expand...
Dude on the right has the mumps. 0/10
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Hi I Am From Page 6, Meowthkip, Yog-Spergoth and 4 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back