SlutHate II: Hatred Edition - Now Known as "RedPillTalk"

@CatParty dox me faggot

@Holden - No,such a pity,the person who leaked the pics didn't list the nicknames but i know for sure those 3 are flossman,valiant and dynastia because i remember their post on the pics thread
 
  • Deviant
Reactions: chimpburgers
Holden said:
Why? This differs from a country to country, culture to culture. Men like OmegaKV or myself know that the insane standards that now exist in places like Anglosphere are simply a product of insane culture and insane people you can read here.
Click to expand...

Insane standards like thinking that people younger than 16 cannot emotionally or mentally cope with sex?
 
@Shidoshi Nah,but probably better looking than you for sure:

OERCXTd.png


Just LOL at this self-admitted sub-human virgin

creepy-tom-cruise-animated-gifs-1.gif
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja, MegasHant, Stratomsk and 1 other person
sugoi-chan said:
This has got to be the weirdest anti-patriarchy statement ever.
Click to expand...
It isn't an anti-patriarchy statement. I believe it is not good that rape shall soon become the only legal means of sex outside of some higher classes. I talk about this here http://www.reddit.com/r/PhilosophyO..._brains_are_wired_to_accept/csj8eey?context=3

Paradigm of rape itself, though, being the norm is extremely important for civilization, but that can be understood only if we know understand what sane societies saw as rape - a property crime against a woman's father or husband. Which is is what it is and always should be.

Then it makes sense. Which good father would want his daughter potentially impregnated by a man who won't marry her or, since marrying virgins is a natural male instinct suppressed in modern society, having her future husband marrying as a non-virgin ?

Which husband would want his wife impregnated by another man? Even with today's technology we still have brains that are kinda older.

Hence the crime of rape. The issue was never "consent". Consent is a huge red herring. The crime of rape was never about consent but these issues. Consent and the amount of resistance were the difference between rough adulterous sex and rape.

A huge paradox in modern society is that since thugs are reproducing in extremely high numbers and kids basically belong to the state women are bothered less with rape in feminist societies, not more.

What you're suggesting is something I disagree with. It's where this society is heading, to us being utter apes, but it's not what we have shown ourselves capable of in sane, patriarchal societies.

Positron said:
Thank god for Patriarchy, for keeping women from you.
Click to expand...
Huh? I never lived in a patriarchy.

Also.

I believe it is not good that rape shall soon become the only legal means of sex outside of some higher classes. I talk about this here http://www.reddit.com/r/PhilosophyO..._brains_are_wired_to_accept/csj8eey?context=3

Paradigm of rape itself, though, being the norm is extremely important for civilization, but that can be understood only if we know understand what sane societies saw as rape - a property crime against a woman's father or husband. Which is is what it is and always should be.

Then it makes sense. Which good father would want his daughter potentially impregnated by a man who won't marry her or, since marrying virgins is a natural male instinct suppressed in modern society, having her future husband marrying as a non-virgin ?

Which husband would want his wife impregnated by another man? Even with today's technology we still have brains that are kinda older.

Hence the crime of rape. The issue was never "consent". Consent is a huge red herring. The crime of rape was never about consent but these issues. Consent and the amount of resistance were the difference between rough adulterous sex and rape.

A huge paradox in modern society is that since thugs are reproducing in extremely high numbers and kids basically belong to the state women are bothered less with rape in feminist societies, not more.

What you're suggesting is something I disagree with. It's where this society is heading, to us being utter apes, but it's not what we have shown ourselves capable of in sane, patriarchal societies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
  • Late
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja, Rin, ChuckSlaughter and 2 others
Holden said:
It isn't an anti-patriarchy statement. I believe it is not good that rape shall soon become the only legal means of sex outside of some higher classes. I talk about this here http://www.reddit.com/r/PhilosophyO..._brains_are_wired_to_accept/csj8eey?context=3

Paradigm of rape itself, though, being the norm is extremely important for civilization, but that can be understood only if we know understand what sane societies saw as rape - a property crime against a woman's father or husband. Which is is what it is and always should be.

Then it makes sense. Which good father would want his daughter potentially impregnated by a man who won't marry her or, since marrying virgins is a natural male instinct suppressed in modern society, having her future husband marrying as a non-virgin ?

Which husband would want his wife impregnated by another man? Even with today's technology we still have brains that are kinda older.

Hence the crime of rape. The issue was never "consent". Consent is a huge red herring. The crime of rape was never about consent but these issues. Consent and the amount of resistance were the difference between rough adulterous sex and rape.

A huge paradox in modern society is that since thugs are reproducing in extremely high numbers and kids basically belong to the state women are bothered less with rape in feminist societies, not more.

What you're suggesting is something I disagree with. It's where this society is heading, to us being utter apes, but it's not what we have shown ourselves capable of in sane, patriarchal societies.
Click to expand...

This is sickening.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Rin, HickoryDickory and Stratomsk
Holden said:
Hence the crime of rape. The issue was never "consent". Consent is a huge red herring. The crime of rape was never about consent but these issues. Consent and the amount of resistance were the difference between rough adulterous sex and rape.
Click to expand...

Like...you do realize that it's not the 19th century anymore, right? There aren't brideprices and dowries and preserving a woman's virginity so that the sons she pops out are guaranteed to be legitimate isn't a number-one concern, right?

The problem you have with this crap, Holden, is that you assume that in this Brave New World you want to create where women are back to being property and can be pawned off based on their father's wishes...you still have no value. No father would want you marrying his daughter because you bring nothing to the table.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Trombonista, Jonzun, ChuckSlaughter and 1 other person
Dove said:
Err....For your knowledge,those pics aren't doxing,they were posted on the pics thread in the offtopic section


In order

@Valiant
@flossman
@Dynastia

more pics dumped by our friend @DiamondInTheRough


pls let me back in the offtopic section. LOL's like the one i had when i was browsing the pics thread are just a dream now. pls :(
Click to expand...

Well then I suppose it's only fair to have Diamonds pic as well:

xTiTnqSnUotoGZehBC.gif

(FWIW Diamond, you were wasted on SH)

Whichever Kiwi took a photo of himself next to the spice rack wins. He just wins.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja, José Mourinho, Rin and 3 others
Holden said:
Huh? I never lived in a patriarchy.

Also.

I believe it is not good that rape shall soon become the only legal means of sex outside of some higher classes. I talk about this here http://www.reddit.com/r/PhilosophyO..._brains_are_wired_to_accept/csj8eey?context=3

Paradigm of rape itself, though, being the norm is extremely important for civilization, but that can be understood only if we know understand what sane societies saw as rape - a property crime against a woman's father or husband. Which is is what it is and always should be.

Then it makes sense. Which good father would want his daughter potentially impregnated by a man who won't marry her or, since marrying virgins is a natural male instinct suppressed in modern society, having her future husband marrying as a non-virgin ?

Which husband would want his wife impregnated by another man? Even with today's technology we still have brains that are kinda older.

Hence the crime of rape. The issue was never "consent". Consent is a huge red herring. The crime of rape was never about consent but these issues. Consent and the amount of resistance were the difference between rough adulterous sex and rape.

A huge paradox in modern society is that since thugs are reproducing in extremely high numbers and kids basically belong to the state women are bothered less with rape in feminist societies, not more.

What you're suggesting is something I disagree with. It's where this society is heading, to us being utter apes, but it's not what we have shown ourselves capable of in sane, patriarchal societies.
Click to expand...
I've never asked you this but how would you classify your economic views? I know you've said before that you'd like the government to pay women to go on dates with other men, but what would you do about welfare and other government benefits and social programs because it always seems like to me that you blame the state for a lot of these issues.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja and Stratomsk
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back