US Social Security Administration to require in-person identity checks for new and existing recipients

By FATIMA HUSSEIN
Updated 10:48 PM UTC, March 18, 2025

1742398327706.png
Demonstrators gather outside of the Edward A. Garmatz United States District Courthouse in Baltimore, on Friday, March 14, 2025, before a hearing regarding the Department of Government Efficiency’s access to Social Security data. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)

WASHINGTON (AP) — In an effort to limit fraudulent claims, the Social Security Administration will impose tighter identity-proofing measures — which will require millions of recipients and applicants to visit agency field offices rather than interact with the agency over the phone.

Beginning March 31st, people will no longer be able to verify their identity to the SSA over the phone and those who cannot properly verify their identity over the agency’s “my Social Security” online service, will be required to visit an agency field office in person to complete the verification process, agency leadership told reporters Tuesday.

The change will apply to new Social Security applicants and existing recipients who want to change their direct deposit information.

Retiree advocates warn that the change will negatively impact older Americans in rural areas, including those with disabilities, mobility limitations, those who live far from SSA offices and have limited internet access.

The plan also comes as the agency plans to shutter dozens of Social Security offices throughout the country and has already laid out plans to lay off thousands of workers.

In addition to the identity verification change, the agency announced that it plans to expedite processing of recipients’ direct deposit change requests – both in person and online – to one business day. Previously, online direct deposit changes were held for 30 days.

“The Social Security Administration is losing over $100 million a year in direct deposit fraud,” Leland Dudek, the agency’s acting commissioner, said on a Tuesday evening call with reporters — his first call with the media. “Social Security can better protect Americans while expediting service.”

He said a problem with eliminating fraudulent claims is that “the information that we use through knowledge-based authentication is already in the public domain.”

“This is a common sense measure,” Dudek added.

More than 72.5 million people, including retirees and children, receive retirement and disability benefits through the Social Security Administration.

Connecticut Rep. John Larson, the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee, said in a statement that “by requiring seniors and disabled Americans to enroll online or in person at the same field offices they are trying to close, rather than over the phone, Trump and Musk are trying to create chaos and inefficiencies at SSA so they can privatize the system.”

The DOGE website says that leases for 47 Social Security field offices across the country, including in Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, Florida, Kentucky and North Carolina, have been or will be ended. However, Dudek downplayed the impact of its offices shuttering, saying many were small remote hearing sites that served few members of the public.

Many Americans have been concerned that SSA office closures and massive layoffs of federal workers — part of an effort by President Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency to shrink the size of the federal government — will make getting benefits even more difficult.

Musk has pushed debunked theories about Social Security and described the federal benefit programs as rife with fraud, and called it a “Ponzi scheme” suggesting the program will be a primary target in his crusade to reduce government spending.

Voters have flooded town halls across the country to question Republican lawmakers about the Trump administration’s cuts, including its plans for the old-age benefits program.

In addition a group of labor unions last week sued and asked a federal court for an emergency order to stop DOGE from accessing the sensitive Social Security data of millions of Americans.

Source (Archive)
 
Connecticut Rep. John Larson, the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee, said in a statement that “by requiring seniors and disabled Americans to enroll online or in person at the same field offices they are trying to close, rather than over the phone, Trump and Musk are trying to create chaos and inefficiencies at SSA so they can privatize the system.”
This is a retarded statement.

The reality is the DNC does not want fraud reduced in general because they and their pets are the biggest beneficiaries of the fraud.
 
I could see that being inconvenient if you're a genuine cripple and can't drive to the SocSec office on your own. But surely they'd have people to drive them anyway, so I see no downside here.
Mark my words: Leftists will find the one bedridden boomer who lives in a house in the middle of nowhere to keep their Social Security fraud going.
 
I could see that being inconvenient if you're a genuine cripple and can't drive to the SocSec office on your own. But surely they'd have people to drive them anyway, so I see no downside here.
Ever since covid basically everyone that has any form of disability that's on paper with the state gets access to free ride share; they don't even have to have the coupons anymore. that was supposed to end at the beginning of this year but it has continued
 
Last edited:
Ever since covid basically everyone that has any form of disability that's on paper where the state gets access to free ride share they don't even have to have the coupons anymore. that was supposed to end at the beginning of this year but it has continued
Honestly based. Sure fraudsters and hypochondriacs likely benefit from this but it also likely benefits the people who need it.
 
I could see that being inconvenient if you're a genuine cripple and can't drive to the SocSec office on your own. But surely they'd have people to drive them anyway, so I see no downside here.
It would also be incredibly inconvenient for expats too.
Not an issue unless they want to change their bank account.

This won’t kick all the existing illegals off, but it will stop new illegals from joining and family members from continuing to collect their dead relatives’ pension.
 
I could see that being inconvenient if you're a genuine cripple and can't drive to the SocSec office on your own. But surely they'd have people to drive them anyway, so I see no downside here.
Well it is bad for those who are completely bed bound and those who don’t have easy access to transportation due to the fact insurance companies love to fuck over people by making them go with the most shit service that will make the patient jump through 50 hoops to even get a ride.
 
The MySocialSecurity app let's you verify online, it's just a bitch. If you're not that person, you probably won't have the variety of IDs and ability to answer the records-based questions in order to complete the process. The vast majority of recipients are probably already verified on MySocialSecurity, or can be without too much fuss.

The people who are going to be bitten on the ass by this is people who try to Weekend-At-Bernie's their grandmas through the process. If Grandma is too senile, and Junior doesn't know all the answers to the questions, they're gonna have to drag the poor old thing into the office. It sucks, but it's necessary. No corpus, no christmas. No cadaver, no palaver. No mummy, no money.
 
The MySocialSecurity app let's you verify online, it's just a bitch. If you're not that person, you probably won't have the variety of IDs and ability to answer the records-based questions in order to complete the process. The vast majority of recipients are probably already verified on MySocialSecurity, or can be without too much fuss.

The people who are going to be bitten on the ass by this is people who try to Weekend-At-Bernie's their grandmas through the process. If Grandma is too senile, and Junior doesn't know all the answers to the questions, they're gonna have to drag the poor old thing into the office. It sucks, but it's necessary. No corpus, no christmas. No cadaver, no palaver. No mummy, no money.
If the government was smart they would hire agents who could travel to do this but that would require them to hire people who can be fucked to leave their house and talk to people.
 
The change will apply to new Social Security applicants and existing recipients who want to change their direct deposit information.
How often does one need to change direct deposit info though? It seems to me if this is something that's actually a regular inconvenience you've either found an extreme edge case, or something is up that you're changing your bank that often.
 
Retiree advocates warn that the change will negatively impact older Americans in rural areas, including those with disabilities, mobility limitations, those who live far from SSA offices and have limited internet access.
Rural Americans aren't retards who can't go into the city every now and then. This would only be a problem if the SSA offices weren't able to process people on arrival. Rural people made due for decades before and will be fine now, still able to do it online if they're able, but I know a lot of boomers struggle with that and internet can be abysmal in the sticks.

Perhaps they should advocate for the SSA to leave the office instead of continuing an abused system.
 
How often does one need to change direct deposit info though? It seems to me if this is something that's actually a regular inconvenience you've either found an extreme edge case, or something is up that you're changing your bank that often.
If someone keeps changing their bank account, it's because they're so retarded that they can't even keep it from going into the red.
 
If the government was smart they would hire agents who could travel to do this but that would require them to hire people who can be fucked to leave their house and talk to people.
Even if they did hire people like that they'd find some way to cock it up. They often do.
 
Back