Disaster Social Security is projected to be insolvent a year earlier than previously forecast - LOL Get fucked Gen-X

The financial outlook for Social Security is eroding more quickly than previously expected, as the coronavirus pandemic has drained government revenues and put additional strain on one of the nation’s most important social safety net programs. The overall finances for Medicare, however, are expected to hold steady, though the health program is still forecast to face financial pressure in the coming years.

Annual government reports released on Tuesday on the solvency of the programs underscored the questions about their long-term viability at a time when a wave of baby boomers are retiring and the economy faces ongoing uncertainty as variants of the coronavirus surge. The United States economy already faces soaring federal debt levels in the coming decades, but both Democrats and Republicans have been wary of making significant structural reforms to the popular programs.

“Having strong Social Security and Medicare programs is essential in order to ensure a secure retirement for all Americans, especially for our most vulnerable populations,” Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen said in a statement. “The Biden-Harris administration is committed to safeguarding these programs and ensuring they continue to deliver economic security and health care to older Americans.”

Senior administration officials said that the long-term effects of the pandemic on the programs are unclear. The actuaries were forced to make assumptions about how long Covid would continue to cause unusual patterns of hospitalizations and deaths and whether it would contribute to long-term disabilities among survivors.

The Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund will now be depleted in 2033, a year earlier than previously projected, according to the report. At that time, the trust fund will run out of reserves and the program will be insolvent, with new tax revenues failing to cover scheduled payments. The report estimated that 76 percent of scheduled benefits will be able to be paid out unless Congress changes the rules to allow full payouts.

The Disability Insurance Trust Fund is now expected to be depleted by 2057, which is eight years earlier than previously thought, at which time 91 percent of benefits will be paid.

Medicare’s finances are effectively holding steady. While tax revenue for the Medicare program did decline as a result of the Covid-related recession, Medicare also ended up spending less money than usual last year, as people avoided elective care.

Medicare’s hospital trust fund is projected to be unable to pay all of its bills beginning in 2026. This estimate is similar to those from Medicare’s trustees in recent years. Fixing that gap now could be achieved by increasing the Medicare payroll tax rate from 2.9 percent to 3.67 percent or by reducing Medicare spending by 16 percent each year, the report notes.

But the report highlighted that the official estimate may be unrealistically optimistic. If certain policies set to expire in the next 10 years are extended, or if other expected policy changes occur, the projections would look substantially more worrying.

Long term, the actuaries said they did not think Covid-19 itself would have substantial influence on Medicare spending on hospital care. On the one hand, the death of many vulnerable, older Americans from the virus may reduce future spending they would otherwise have received. On the other, the actuaries expect that some people may have additional health care needs from the syndrome known as long Covid.

Biden’s 2022 Budget

The 2022 fiscal year for the federal government begins on October 1, and President Biden has revealed what he’d like to spend, starting then. But any spending requires approval from both chambers of Congress. Here’s what the plan includes:

Ambitious total spending: President Biden would like the federal government to spend $6 trillion in the 2022 fiscal year, and for total spending to rise to $8.2 trillion by 2031. That would take the United States to its highest sustained levels of federal spending since World War II, while running deficits above $1.3 trillion through the next decade.

Infrastructure plan: The budget outlines the president’s desired first year of investment in his American Jobs Plan, which seeks to fund improvements to roads, bridges, public transit and more with a total of $2.3 trillion over eight years.

Families plan: The budget also addresses the other major spending proposal Biden has already rolled out, his American Families Plan, aimed at bolstering the United States’ social safety net by expanding access to education, reducing the cost of child care and supporting women in the work force.

Mandatory programs: As usual, mandatory spending on programs like Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare make up a significant portion of the proposed budget. They are growing as America’s population ages.

Discretionary spending: Funding for the individual budgets of the agencies and programs under the executive branch would reach around $1.5 trillion in 2022, a 16 percent increase from the previous budget.

How Biden would pay for it: The president would largely fund his agenda by raising taxes on corporations and high earners, which would begin to shrink budget deficits in the 2030s. Administration officials have said tax increases would fully offset the jobs and families plans over the course of 15 years, which the budget request backs up. In the meantime, the budget deficit would remain above $1.3 trillion each year.

The actuaries declined to make any estimates on the effect of Aduhelm, a very expensive Alzheimer’s treatment that was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The report said that officials were waiting for Medicare to issue guidance on how the drug will be covered before making any calculations. The drug could represent tens of billions of dollars in spending each year.
Democrats in Congress are considering a host of changes to the Medicare program, such as adding new benefits, including coverage for dental, hearing and vision care. While these changes are expected to influence Medicare’s overall finances, none of them are likely to have major effects on the trust fund, which covers only hospital care.

“Medicare trust fund solvency is an incredibly important, longstanding issue, and we are committed to working with Congress to continue building a vibrant, equitable, and sustainable Medicare program,” said Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, the administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

 
Another thing to keep in mind is that the retirement age for Social Security was roughly the average life span of the American male. It was originally supposed to be a consolation prize for outliving half your friends., unless you were unlucky and didn't see shit thanks to dying of one thing or another. It was always a massive grift that relied on mass numbers of people not seeing a dime of what they paid in.
 
Good. The sooner I have to stop paying into it, the better. It's annoying when older people even acknowledge it as a ponzi scheme, but just say "And that's why I keep telling younger they gotta keep paying into it"
 
Doesn't really matter. The economy has been fucked everyway possible and inflation is out of control. Any social security that the generations younger than your average Facebook boomer would be getting is fucking pennies anyways.
yep, i remember a grandparent who retired right on time only getting $20k a year to live on the rest of his life, which was a lot back in the 70s but could barely keep the lights on in the 2010s.
Generations are a fake idea.
yep, even then the two people that were president that were born in the 60s are known for being way more conservative than the rest of their generation and compared to their boomer predecessors

and dont get me started on year sperging, people born in the 60s are either evil boomer or saintly gen-xers depending on who you ask, same with people born in the 80s and the term millenial.

Boomer holodomor where
imagine a logan's run but instead of 30 its 60.
 
Generations are a fake idea.
I do not understand how they came to be. For what purpose do they exist? How do they make the world better? All they do is allowed stupid people to hyper-compartmentalize and form meaningless tribes.

I could understand if they were delineated around major events, because at least then there's an actual, measurable difference between someone born on Year X versus Year X Minus One. It still probably wouldn't have any real impact on anything, but I can appreciate the difference between "old enough to remember a time before [9/11 | segregation | world war 2 | whatever] " or otherwise.
 
I do not understand how they came to be. For what purpose do they exist? How do they make the world better? All they do is allowed stupid people to hyper-compartmentalize and form meaningless tribes.

I could understand if they were delineated around major events, because at least then there's an actual, measurable difference between someone born on Year X versus Year X Minus One. It still probably wouldn't have any real impact on anything, but I can appreciate the difference between "old enough to remember a time before [9/11 | segregation | world war 2 | whatever] " or otherwise.
Madison Avenue.
 
I can't wait to laugh at all the leftoids who call me stupid when I try to tell them it's a ponzi scheme.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NoReturn
GCJvvZk.png
And then they just advertise that bullshit as a specific number of calories like its a feature meant to help you diet, and they're doing us a favor by making us pay more for less.

I need a tophat.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Overly Serious
I do not understand how they came to be. For what purpose do they exist? How do they make the world better? All they do is allowed stupid people to hyper-compartmentalize and form meaningless tribes.

I could understand if they were delineated around major events, because at least then there's an actual, measurable difference between someone born on Year X versus Year X Minus One. It still probably wouldn't have any real impact on anything, but I can appreciate the difference between "old enough to remember a time before [9/11 | segregation | world war 2 | whatever] " or otherwise.
Because old people and young people are obviously different people.
 
People ITT don't understand how young Boomer's are. My dad is a boomer, Just making the cut off, He has almost a decade left until retirement. If you're bitching about 80 year olds you're bitching about the greatest generation not boomers.
 
This could be fixed if there wasn't a contribution cap.

After you start making a reasonable salary, they stop taking any more FICA taxes out. You just hit a cap. Plastic surgeons and junior software engineers pay the same exact amount of FICA, as an absolute amount, not a percentage.

That cap means a huge amount of salary is untouchable, but if it weren't, Social Security would be solvent indefinitely. Honestly it is sort of stupid because while it's a lot of money in an absolute sense, FICA is basically a rounding error when you're at the contribution cap, most people at that salary level are also contributing to private retirement accounts and have investments plus a house that is appreciating in value. Most beneficiaries of the cap wouldn't take a single lifestyle hit of any kind from making FICA contributions on the entirety of their salary, not just the portion up to $137,000.
This makes sense until you consider that the payout is proportionate to the pay-in. This fix is just kicking the can down the road.

We'll likely have another pushback of the date where you can start getting benefits like what happened to the late-boomers when this problem was first dealt with 20 years ago.

Brace yourself for not collecting full benefits until 70+. Set up your personal retirement accounts accordingly.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Autistic Joe
People ITT don't understand how young Boomer's are. My dad is a boomer, Just making the cut off, He has almost a decade left until retirement. If you're bitching about 80 year olds you're bitching about the greatest generation not boomers.
Yeah both my boomer parents still have a few decades left. Most autists seem to think Boomers are a bunch of racist 80 year olds calling everyone nigger or something for some reason.
 
You know what will happen, don't you?
All those private accounts set up by responsible and sensible people acting as individuals to plan for their own retirements, there's TRILLIONS of dollars just sitting there.
The Government sees that money, the Government will hunger and just take that money to fluff up Social Security then give all those people who had their money confiscated an I.O.U. or an option to 'buy in' to Social Security.
So all those people that dutifully set up their Roth or HSA or some other form of account will just have their money taken. It's for the greater good you know, you don't want grannies to die in the streets, do you bigot?
Oh, and all of you silver, gold or precious metals bros? The US Government sees you too, just wait and watch for the Govt. to say that owning silver and gold are illegal and force a mandatory turn-in. Oh, but don't worry, you'll get an I.O.U. that they'll super-swear they'll pay you back... eventually... maybe...
Then with all this new debt spending, how long do you think it will be before the Govt. decides to push for a negative interest rate? Where if by some small miracle you actually have cash you'll have to pay what is effectively a tax to hold cash...


fun times are ahead.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Eternal Gopnik
People ITT don't understand how young Boomer's are. My dad is a boomer, Just making the cut off, He has almost a decade left until retirement. If you're bitching about 80 year olds you're bitching about the greatest generation not boomers.

Yeah both my boomer parents still have a few decades left. Most autists seem to think Boomers are a bunch of racist 80 year olds calling everyone nigger or something for some reason.
The baby boom referred to the huge increase in pregnancies from returning WW2 vets. Insofar as it can possibly have any meaning, "boomers" are in their seventies or late sixties.

A fifty-five year old probably had parents born after or during the war. If that's a "baby boomer," the phrase is meaningless.

An eighty year old would have been four in 1945. That's not "greatest generation." America didn't have four year old soldiers.
 
Last edited:
You can't disagree but love me anyway and not tell the tale of America's toddler battalions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Overly Serious
Back