- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
>Torrenting software
Null, have you gone commie on us?
Null, have you gone commie on us?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Arch or nothing.There should be a Linux distros section. I've had good experiences with Void, Ubuntu Mate, and Debian (though Debian does have a learning curve, especially since it doesn't contain the firmware by default.)
If you're on linux, check out MPC-QT. Basically a recreation of MPC-HC in linux using MPV as its backend. Had issues with VLC on my new laptop (would freeze and cause me to reboot) but 0 with MPC-QT.Something diffrent but
I endorse the mpc-hc video player
It plays every video file i have, can switch audio on the fly, supports subtitles and is highly customizable
https://mpc-hc.org/
I use startpage as my main search engine. Uses google results but keeps everything private. Also as an excellent dark skin built-in to the site.DuckDuckGo is probably the most user friendly of search engines that claim to be "Pro Privacy" in my opinion.
A) Firefox is the modern descendant of Netscape. B) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaMonkeyNo-one uses Netscape Navigator? ;ronery face;
The only problem I have is with some YouTube videos, but I can just go into desktop mode, and they work just fine. I can even play them in other tabs in desktop mode.I use the Android version of Brave and I can confirm it rocks.
There are tools you can use to enjoy the Internet more. I am a crazy person on the Internet 24/7 and this is what works best for me.
Browser
Brave
Pros
Cons
- Heavy privacy emphasis.
- Far and away the best mobile browser. Allows mobile extensions.
- Built-in ad block.
- Supports cryptocurrency "Basic Attention Token" natively, and is a promising way for casual web users (you) to support sites (kiwi farms) anonymously and easily by paying pennies to websites and content creators you frequent the most.
- Headed by Brendan Eich, creator of JavaScript and founding/former CEO of Mozilla.
...
- Extensions are centrally organized, so people with heavy extension dependencies absolutely will not have everything they want.
- Desktop browser has performance issues after being open for a long time.
- Just shit for web developers. The element inspector is far inferior to both FireFox and Chrome. Fuck, it's worse than IE's.
Search Engines
DuckDuckGo
Pros
Cons
- It's its own thing. A lot of privacy-centric search engines are just Google in a candy wrapper.
- Pretty good. Sometimes even has a leg up on Google. DDG had StackOverflow previews before Google did, for instance.
- Google obfuscates results it does not want you to see. DDG does not.
- "DDG it" is much better sounding than "Bing it".
- Results are sometimes much poorer than Google's, but most of the time they're fine.
DDG is amazing, more people need to use it and stop shilling for google![]()
When it comes to the quality of the results you get, DDG is decent. Not good and certainly not great. Per user results are the crucial missing ingredient, I think.TBH at this point, when I do use google, it just feels wrong. I'm completely used to DuckDuckGo by this point, and --I don't know if they just steal googles search results, or are comparably powerful in their own right-- they almost always find what I'm looking for. Only thing DDG suffers at slightly is image/video searching, but that might just be me.
Arch's wiki and the AUR are what set it apart. I don't see myself switching anytime soon. (Maybe I'd check out some kind of docker-esque based package manager at some point, I think there's been a few experiments with that kind of setup.)Arch or nothing. Antergos is easy as shit to install (no terminal to manually install shit) and I've had very little issue with the OS. The Arch wiki is great too. Had a major problem with Gnome 3, Arch, and OpenVPN. Couldn't run it normally and had to run it through terminal to get it working. No issues with Antergos.
Transmission used to be my torrent client of choice, because it's simple and gets the job done. However they don't support (or at least don't have an option for it in their settings) proxies.
I went for years without using proxies and without using private trackers, just to prove I could. But about two years ago, I got my first copyright complaint letter, so had to change my policy. So now I'm using a proxy and I had to switch clients.
Now I'm using qBittorrent. It's a little more complicated but it gets the job done.
When it comes to the quality of the results you get, DDG is decent. Not good and certainly not great. Per user results are the crucial missing ingredient, I think.
Arch's wiki and the AUR are what set it apart. I don't see myself switching anytime soon. (Maybe I'd check out some kind of docker-esque based package manager at some point, I think there's been a few experiments with that kind of setup.)
Transmission used to be my torrent client of choice, because it's simple and gets the job done. However they don't support (or at least don't have an option for it in their settings) proxies.
I went for years without using proxies and without using private trackers, just to prove I could. But about two years ago, I got my first copyright complaint letter, so had to change my policy. So now I'm using a proxy and I had to switch clients.
Now I'm using qBittorrent. It's a little more complicated but it gets the job done.
Downloading GNU/Linux distros.Who and why still uses torrent programs when you can support and pay stuff legally with just a few bucks nowadays?