Software Endorsements

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Did you like the App?

  • yes

  • no

  • Stop waisting our time


Results are only viewable after voting.
The payment buttons are download links
Once installed it generates a device ID and sends you to one of
or

This is what the fingerprint function looks like
JavaScript:
  // Create a device fingerprint
  async createFingerprint() {
    const components = [
      navigator.userAgent,
      navigator.language,
      screen.width + 'x' + screen.height,
      screen.colorDepth,
      new Date().getTimezoneOffset(),
      navigator.hardwareConcurrency,
      navigator.deviceMemory || 'unknown',
      navigator.platform,
      navigator.cookieEnabled,
      navigator.doNotTrack,
      navigator.maxTouchPoints || 'unknown'
    ];

    // Create a hash from the components
    const fingerprintString = components.join('|');
    const encoder = new TextEncoder();
    const data = encoder.encode(fingerprintString);
    const hashBuffer = await crypto.subtle.digest('SHA-256', data);
    const hashArray = Array.from(new Uint8Array(hashBuffer));
    const hashHex = hashArray.map(b => b.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')).join('');
    
    return hashHex.substring(0, 16).toUpperCase(); // Return first 16 characters
  }
So I guess if your browser updates, you plug in a tablet, your resolution changes, etc. you're basically screwed and get unlicensed. I checked the license validation function to see if there's some nuance and no, it literally just sends JEETBLOCK-${fingerprint} (as that's your device ID) to some bullshit API endpoint and then saves when it last did it so it can re-validate on an interval.

For something which claims to be anti-Jeet it sure looks like shitty half-baked Jeet vibecoding to me.
 
Once installed it generates a device ID and sends you to one of
or

This is what the fingerprint function looks like
JavaScript:
  // Create a device fingerprint
  async createFingerprint() {
    const components = [
      navigator.userAgent,
      navigator.language,
      screen.width + 'x' + screen.height,
      screen.colorDepth,
      new Date().getTimezoneOffset(),
      navigator.hardwareConcurrency,
      navigator.deviceMemory || 'unknown',
      navigator.platform,
      navigator.cookieEnabled,
      navigator.doNotTrack,
      navigator.maxTouchPoints || 'unknown'
    ];

    // Create a hash from the components
    const fingerprintString = components.join('|');
    const encoder = new TextEncoder();
    const data = encoder.encode(fingerprintString);
    const hashBuffer = await crypto.subtle.digest('SHA-256', data);
    const hashArray = Array.from(new Uint8Array(hashBuffer));
    const hashHex = hashArray.map(b => b.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')).join('');
   
    return hashHex.substring(0, 16).toUpperCase(); // Return first 16 characters
  }
So I guess if your browser updates, you plug in a tablet, your resolution changes, etc. you're basically screwed and get unlicensed. I checked the license validation function to see if there's some nuance and no, it literally just sends JEETBLOCK-${fingerprint} (as that's your device ID) to some bullshit API endpoint and then saves when it last did it so it can re-validate on an interval.

For something which claims to be anti-Jeet it sure looks like shitty half-baked Jeet vibecoding to me.

Can't we just erase the verification part and just return true?
 
There's some really basic integrity checks but the only one implemen4sted wouldn't prevent you from doing that and the more sophisticated stuff isn't even implemented. Though this extension looks like shit so I don't know why you'd want to run it.
You know, I will admit, I installed it and only after a moment did I realize "huh I just installed software from someone I've never heard of before" and immediately worried about cookies getting stolen. There are better options than some vibe coded nonsense but it is certainly hilarious that he gives you the files and then asks for payment.
 
IN MY OPINION: This seems like a scam made by Jeet
This might be schizo, but i support this mainly because
1761150331252.png

1761150359702.png

THE SPACING IS OFF!!

In my experience, when i look at a site and some elements are off, thats a sign that
1. Its a scam site made by retards
2. Its a scam site vibe coded by retards

I'm not always correct, but generally i am.I'm also a bit too lazy to so the nerdy stuff to deepdive.
 
I'm not always correct, but generally i am.I'm also a bit too lazy to so the nerdy stuff to deepdive.
All sites are scams until proven otherwise. Im still iffy on this kiwifarms place.

If anyone wants a simple word processing program, I like Jarte. Its like if Wordpad evolved. The UI is ancient, but quaint and simple and it can run off a flash drive or even online storage.

 
For something which claims to be anti-Jeet it sure looks like shitty half-baked Jeet vibecoding to me.
Brown hands wrote this the prompts to generate this code.
If anyone wants a simple word processing program, I like Jarte. Its like if Wordpad evolved. The UI is ancient, but quaint and simple and it can run off a flash drive or even online storage.
I never really understood what's wrong with "type words into something and make it a document" without fancy bullshit.
 
I gotta say that this doesn't look like anything too special.
The blocking strategy is not exactly artificial intelligence.

4f1c515001.png

Emoji filtering might cause a few false positives:

e1fc0cb001.png

I don't know why I'd let someone else decide what posts I block.
 
Last edited:
I never really understood what's wrong with "type words into something and make it a document" without fancy bullshit.
If you want to write text, use fucking anything. Notepad, Notepad++, vim, emacs, whatever you prefer. It's text, one of the most primordial forms of computer data.
If you need your text to be fancy, just use LaTeX. Not as easy as WordPad? Will definitely look infinitely better and will be print ready right away.

By the end of the day, all you'll want to do is first write your text and then make it pretty.
 
Saw this 'adblocker' recommended by Louis Rossmann


View attachment 8130325
hmmmmm
It blew up in popularity back in 2017 when Google, one of the companies it might be considered a middle finger to, removed it from the Chrome store. Not sure why it's becoming popular again. Advertisement companies, while fraudulent and almost always stealing your money when launching ad campaigns, can tell when it's not an actual user intentionally clicking those ads thanks to the amount of data your browser willingly, intentionally (in chrome's case even more so) gives up by design to allow that and more. It might be appealing because you feel you're fighting advertisers, but it doesn't even register to them. It's just sad it had to get to that point you need the equivalent of clickbots from 20 years ago but running on every page, for everyone, to feel like you might be doing something against those corpos that can see everything you do on your browser and most worryingly your mobile devices and use it against you.
 
What's the verdict on https://www.tweeks.io ?

Some KF users have visually distracting gif pfps (stone me to death, I am guilty) and I would like to block the elements - but Brave Tor doesn't have the block element function and I can't get Ublock or NoScript to do it for me either.

I'm too software illiterate to evaluate whether this Tweeks extension is a fox in the henhouse or not.
 
Saw this 'adblocker' recommended by Louis Rossmann


View attachment 8130325
hmmmmm
I'll wait a few more weeks/maybe a month to see if people think it's good.
What's the verdict on https://www.tweeks.io ?

Some KF users have visually distracting gif pfps (stone me to death, I am guilty) and I would like to block the elements - but Brave Tor doesn't have the block element function and I can't get Ublock or NoScript to do it for me either.

I'm too software illiterate to evaluate whether this Tweeks extension is a fox in the henhouse or not.
I use the "Stealth" mode on KF so I don't look at retarded tranime avatars - but I also miss potentially fun ones too.
 
I installed a LineageOS-based GSI (generic system image) on a cheap Motorola I bought and am very impressed with it so far. Currently on my way to getting 20 hours of active use/screen-on time out of a single charge, while the stock firmware only gave me 12-14. What's weird is that this particular phone has a MediaTek chipset, which are supposed to be bad on ROMs.
97.jpg
63.jpg


Do note though that GSIs vary from device to device, my phone doesn't have any tailored ROMs for it so I'm forced to use one. Also I really like microG; it provides Google services without the associated battery drain and datamining.
 
Back
Top Bottom