Sound of Freedom (2023) - Lets talk about the child trafficking Movie Disney owned but did not want to release for 5 years

Saw it last night in theatres, encountered no issues with the projector or the AC. Not really sure I agree with the sentiment that the movie is "overtly Christian" outside of the main character's motivation.

When asked by his boss at the Dept. of Homeland Security about why Tim Ballard would go so far out of his way to try and find this kid's missing sister, Tim just responds with "God's children are not for sale". He goes into a little bit more detail about being a father himself, and how he wouldn't be able to sleep at night if he knew one of his kid's beds were empty, which I think is a better explanation for his primary motive in rescuing Miguel's sister.
There was a one-liner that Tim delivers before arresting a pedo where he quotes Matthew 18:6, but that was cool, so I'm fine with it. And the scene where the former cartel guy explains to Ballard why he quit his life of crime to help rescue kids sold into sex trafficking, which was a really well-delivered monologue. It's not entirely unrealistic for a guy to find God after nearly killing himself.

I haven't seen it mentioned much anywhere, but when the credits rolled there was a little 2 minute countdown in the corner of the screen to let everyone know there was a special message afterwards from Jim Caviezel thanking people for seeing Sound of Freedom in theaters. They even have a program going on right now where you can buy someone else's ticket to see the movie in theaters (link). I was kinda shocked (pleasantly so) to see that most of the audience in my theater stuck around for the special message at the end, and even applauded after it was over.

Really good movie, can't thank modern media outlets enough for drumming up all this publicity.
 
Eduardo Verástegui, (Paul), former Mexican boyband guy (lel) With whom Tim Ballard worked together to produce Sounds of Freedom, in interview with Agustín Laje, Argentine Right Wing YouTuber. Tells the movie was originally meant to be distributed by Fox, but after Fox was acquired by Disney. Disney Actively tried to can the film until two Friends of Verastegui from Argentina working with Disney managed to release the film back to him.

Verastegui also refers to Covid-19 as the "plandemic".

He also expands a little bit on the struggles suffered by the team before they met with Angel Studios. In summary they basically pitched the finished film to literally everybody but everyone in the biz rejected them.

I'm not a pedowood believer per se, but you don't need to be that to know there are very huge high profile pedophiles who would hate this movie being successful

Eventually Cavizel joins the interview for a brief English segment (Agustín can't speak English for shit) and they shit on the Media for their biased treatment and specially on Rolling Stone for shitting on Sounds of Freedom (Verastegui declaring Author for the RS article looks like a pedophile from the movie) while having another writer praising cuties. Verastegui questions the motivations to attack the message of Sounds of Freedom and says they intend to screen the movie at the capitol and ask them to release the Epstein list. He also brings up Hunter Biden's laptop.


English interview with Caviziel where most of that stuff is brought up is 45:46-57:16. Clipped it but I just couldn't upload it.


The press might ride the dick of a bunch of stuff said here trying to damage the movie and tie it to conspiracy theories.

1689461546581.png
 
if you have any normie family who are on the brink of awareness because they saw a movie on this topic, here is a very well written, completely grounded book about how the feds covered up the worst child trafficking network in america, aka the franklin credit union scandal. I shill this in every relevant thread because it's good. spoiler alert the good guys do not win.
it's fucking over for this country. boomers and gen x just put their head in the sand and let the cancer spread. millenials and gen z run active interference to deny organized crime exists at all.
 
if you have any normie family who are on the brink of awareness because they saw a movie on this topic, here is a very well written, completely grounded book about how the feds covered up the worst child trafficking network in america, aka the franklin credit union scandal. I shill this in every relevant thread because it's good. spoiler alert the good guys do not win.
it's fucking over for this country. boomers and gen x just put their head in the sand and let the cancer spread. millenials and gen z run active interference to deny organized crime exists at all.
And you can't present it in an I'm not even going to click on this shit pdf-file? What the fuck is wrong with you?
 

Attachments

Saw It two days ago, it was a lot better than I expected it to be and got pretty emotional at parts.
If you got family and friends go take them to it.

Saw it last night in theatres, encountered no issues with the projector or the AC. Not really sure I agree with the sentiment that the movie is "overtly Christian" outside of the main character's motivation.
It really wasn't like that. He says God's name but not in vain like three times throughout the film. Your average children's book from the 19th century was more overtly religious than this film is.
 
Saw it last night in theatres, encountered no issues with the projector or the AC. Not really sure I agree with the sentiment that the movie is "overtly Christian" outside of the main character's motivation.
For some reason the people who hate this film, if you can call them that, seem extremely offended that the very real problem of buying and selling children as sex toys is not considered an okay thing.

There are very few charitable interpretations left as to why this is so.
 
They couch it as being against "mob justice", "witch hunts" and mindlessly attacking people who've been made into acceptable targets. Which is something when you see these sentiments coming from some of the same people who think someone should lose their livelihood and maybe get arrested for misgendering people, or not thinking the Jan 6 protests were that big of a deal, or having been against masking mandates.
 
So is the only reason people are calling this a right wing movie cause one of the actors is a right wing nut job?
Well no, some people are calling it that because it highlights an actual problem (child sex trafficking), depicts it negatively (and judges it accordingly) and inspires a spirit of "down with child raping!" in the average person, and they're looking for a way to marginalize this position. It naturally upsets pedophiles, because they enjoy fucking children, and people being upset about them fucking children tends to make things messy. And there are apparently an astonishing number of journalists, twitter users, media outlets, actors, producers, directors, writers and others who are either pedophiles themselves or at least support the activity in private.

Fun to see them go masks off like this though. It's not often people openly broadcast "hey, kid fucking is great!" like this.
 
Attempt to expose them and later commit suicide by stabbing yourself 37 times vs. keep your head down, make money and die comfortably.
it is not not sacrificing life and limb to admit your favorite politician/celebrity/preacher is corrupt. nobody stabs me 37 times for sharing a book and saying it's all bullshit.

I do understand why whistleblowers are afraid. they all get destroyed. the book I posted goes into detail about Alisha Owen, who spoke out about her abuse. the media crucified her and the law convicted her of 8 counts of perjury in a blatant sham grand jury. here's the legacy of her bravery:
debooked.png
why should we expect anyone martyr themselves for an apathetic population.
 
Last edited:
Just saw it myself. I liked how they showed actual footage of a raid during the credits. You can see the actual moment the pedos realize their lives are effectively over and they're going to be locked away in a Colombian prison.
Another thing that stood out to me is how a woman was instrumental in kidnapping all those children. It didn't occur to me while I was watching it, but I remembered Null talking about Ralph's pedohorse Meigh during one of his MaTI podcasts. He mentioned that female predators were more dangerous than men because children instinctively trust them more. That's going to haunt me more than anything I saw during the movie, which in of itself was very captivating.
I saw the A&H articles smearing the movie as Qanon propaganda so I made sure to watch out for that. But I didn't really notice anything political about that movie. The only way it could be considered political is if you went out of your way to politicize religion and child trafficking. If you have to wait to see what the politics of those involved in child trafficking are before you'll condemn it, you probably were never against child trafficking in the first place.

It's a great movie and one of the few I would never pirate just out of respect.
 
So is the only reason people are calling this a right wing movie cause one of the actors is a right wing nut job?
It's about child sex trafficking. So it's hitting them in the pocketbook.
I saw the A&H articles smearing the movie as Qanon propaganda so I made sure to watch out for that. But I didn't really notice anything political about that movie.
QAnon is viewed, more or less correctly, as largely batshit lunacy.

So if you are pro-molesting, you're going to try to paint anything against your perversion as "QAnon."
 
I saw it Sunday. I'm not much of a movie goer and I was really more curious about it after reading the batshit opinions on it.

Honestly not a bad movie. Pretty solid 8/10 imo for such a difficult subject matter. It wasn't religious at all nor conspiracy laden. Nothing in there made me think of qanon at all.

The people hating on this movie are the ones who praised cuties. That really makes you think what kind of person they are.
 
Back