Thou art a faggot and thine shit is all retarded.The fact that you fucking think cretins stylized as writers having made up a word barely 100 years ago makes "unironically" not a neologism is beyond me. Also, your pfp and username show how much of a goyslop addict you are.
>inb4 ad hominem
To that I say fallacy fallacy.
And let's not get started on the most grating things to have become popular in English lately, the singular "you" and "they". Troons will say they date back to 700 years ago therefore they're based and valid, but that couldn't be further from the truth. I could go on, but I'd just be dismissed as a prescriptivist bigot.
Even still, that doesn't take away from the fact that the jews and trannies higher up only seek to subvert, corrupt, and pozz everything they touch, not the least of which is, indeed, language. They don't care about precise communication in English, which is why they endorse non-words like "unironically", which is nonsensical, and the singular "they" and "you". "You" is a particularly insidious example. We have other words that express its meaning more clearly: "One" as the indefinite pronoun and "thou" as the 2nd person singular. Wonder why that is? It's the frogniggers and their cosmopolitan bullshit. So we had a perfectly fine, pure language, yes? Then it absorbed huge gobs of impure frognigger semen. Imagine this: Some frognigger says "hon hon hon oldengloogoogagas can't into POLITENESS hon hon THOU art VOUS now" and done, he set a precedent for all sorts of linguistic degeneracy!