- Joined
- Mar 8, 2024
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
is that fuckingThe absolute state of nununusoibooru...
View attachment 5900406
No, its this: https://soyjakwiki.net/Fundamental_Paper_Educationis that fucking
chinese latex furry pedophile indie pixel art game "Changed"?
i miss when incomprehensible whoajacks made fun of people
Blud forgot my lessons about shortening his postsThe fact that you fucking think cretins stylized as writers having made up a word barely 100 years ago makes "unironically" not a neologism is beyond me. Also, your pfp and username show how much of a goyslop addict you are.
>inb4 ad hominem
To that I say fallacy fallacy.
And let's not get started on the most grating things to have become popular in English lately, the singular "you" and "they". Troons will say they date back to 700 years ago therefore they're based and valid, but that couldn't be further from the truth. I could go on, but I'd just be dismissed as a prescriptivist bigot.
Even still, that doesn't take away from the fact that the jews and trannies higher up only seek to subvert, corrupt, and pozz everything they touch, not the least of which is, indeed, language. They don't care about precise communication in English, which is why they endorse non-words like "unironically", which is nonsensical, and the singular "they" and "you". "You" is a particularly insidious example. We have other words that express its meaning more clearly: "One" as the indefinite pronoun and "thou" as the 2nd person singular. Wonder why that is? It's the frogniggers and their cosmopolitan bullshit. So we had a perfectly fine, pure language, yes? Then it absorbed huge gobs of impure frognigger semen. Imagine this: Some frognigger says "hon hon hon oldengloogoogagas can't into POLITENESS hon hon THOU art VOUS now" and done, he set a precedent for all sorts of linguistic degeneracy!
Imagine being such an illiterate retard you don't know un- is a universal prefix freely generating new words.800-1000 words are added to English dictionaries every year, so let's just say there are about 90K other things for you to cry about over the last century.
un-, prefix 1
7. a. Un- is freely prefixed to adjectives of all kinds, except where a Latin form in in-, etc., has definitely established itself in common use. Both forms, however, may co-exist, and in some cases a new formation with un- has been introduced when that with in- has acquired a connotation which it is desirable to avoid. The form with un- is then purely negative, while the other may have almost a positive sense, e.g. un-moral in contrast with immoral. (When the form with un- has similarly acquired a positive implication, the simple negative or neutral sense is expressed by the use of non- or not-.) There is also considerable restriction in the use of un- with short simple adjectives of native origin, the negative of these being naturally supplied by another simple word of an opposite signification. There is thus little or no tendency now to employ such forms as unbroad, undeep, unwide, unbold, unglad, ungood, unstrong, unwhole, unfew, etc., which freely occur in the older language. On the other hand, derivative forms in -al, -ant, -ar, -ary, -ent, -ful, -ic, -ical, -ile, -ish, -ive, -ly, -ory, -ous, -y, etc., are too numerous to be completely recorded. The general character of the less usual or permanent of these and other adjectival forms is illustrated by the following examples, which are a severly restricted selection, and could be indefinitely increased by the addition of less noteworthy material. In dictionaries of various dates many formations are given of which no real instance has been found. Levins (1570) has unhateful, unprecious. Florio (1598 and 1611) renders equivalent Italian words in in- by such forms as unavailful, unbrittle, uncontinuall, uncoy, unempty, unfrail, unnice, unoffensible, unopen, unplenteous, unshrill, unvalorous. Ash (1775) gives unalphabetical, unattendant, uncohesive, uncompatible, uncompressible, uncompulsive, etc. (about 80 in all). Later dictionaries (Webster, Worcester, etc.), with or without indication of source, have the entries unabundant, unbiographical, uncogent, uncollectible, undeceptive, undeliberative, etc.
Recent formations include: unadult, un-African, unairworthy, unambivalent, unarcadian, unarchæological, un-Australian, unbitchy, unblameworthy, unblasé, unbureaucratic, un-Byronic, uncerebral, uncharismatic, unchic (also absol.), un-Chinese, unchipper, unchoosy, un-Christmassy, uncomfy, uncomposite, uncomradely, unconscient, uncool [esp. cool a. 4e] (also absol.), uncooperative, uncosy, uncranky, uncreditworthy, uncuddlesome, uncuddly, un-Darwinian, undeducible, un-Dickensian, undimensional, undisastrous, undoctrinaire, undynamic, unecological, uneconomic, unecstatic, unecumenical, unegoistic, unegotistic, unegotistical, unerotic, unetymological, unexotic, unfaery (poet.), unfeline, unfeminist, unflamboyant, unflashy, unfond, unfresh, unfurtive, un-Gaelic, ungay, ungimmicky, unglamorous, ungroovy, unhep (also absol.), unhip (also absol.), unhors(e)y, unideological, unintrospective, unirksome, unironic, unironical, un-Islamic, un-Italian, un-Jamesian, un-Japanese, unjingoistic, unkeen (also absol.), unkosher, unlegendary, unlocal, unmarital, un-Marxist, unmawkish, unmeritocratic, unneurotic, unodoriferous, unopen, unpacifist, unphonemic, unphon(e)y (also absol.), unphotogenic, unplatonic, unpolemical, unpolicemanly, unpositive, unprestigious, unpriggish, unprivate, un-Proustian, unpugnacious, unradiogenic, unresilient, unrevolutionary, unrisky, unroadworthy, un-Russian, unscenic, unseductive, unselective, unsemantic, unsexy, un-Shelleyan, unsnobbish, unsorry, un-Spanish, unspecial, unspectacular, unstarchy, unsterile, unstiff, unstuffy, unsycophantic, unsymmetric, untendentious, untense, untherapeutic, unthistly, unticklish, untogether, untouristy (also absol.), untraditional, untrendy, unurgent, unutilitarian, unviable, un-Victorian, unviolent, unvisual, un-Western, un-with-it, unworthwhile, unyoung.
Ha, yeah. He's trying to pretend it's just a shitpost but obviously spent a lot of effort on the meme he made.Imagine being such an illiterate retard you don't know un- is a universal prefix freely generating new words.
What about 'tis nuts?Correction: "Thou art a faggot and thy shit is all retarded." ESL newengloogoogaga doesn't know the difference between "thy" and "thine". 'Tis over. 'Tis can't be helped. 'Tis the will of the Lord albeit.
"Though" became a meme because of thoughjak and a certain obsessed Mexican who didn't understand how having "though" at the end of a sentence was valid. Not to mention it was a common occurrence for 'teens to quote thoughers on 4cuck.Ha, yeah. He's trying to pretend it's just a shitpost but obviously spent a lot of effort on the meme he made.
It's a living language. If people intuitively understand the meaning, it's a word.
Ain't that right, y'all?![]()
Much like the jannies and admins trying to leverage their position (bottom) into becoming e-celebs, this is all much less interesting than you think it is."Though" became a meme because of thoughjak and a certain obsessed Mexican who didn't understand how having "though" at the end of a sentence was valid. Not to mention it was a common occurrence for 'teens to quote thoughers on 4cuck.
Good. Literally no one on that hellsite or it's splinters are just shitposting about CSAM.The soyjak.colony got fedded.
i also had a grand smile when I read thisI'm really excited and I'm smiling like an idiot as I make this post.
I wouldn't go full "living language" but the un- prefix is obviously a case where the rule is strongly in favor of word generation.Ha, yeah. He's trying to pretend it's just a shitpost but obviously spent a lot of effort on the meme he made.
It's a living language. If people intuitively understand the meaning, it's a word.
Ain't that right, y'all?![]()
That is a gay face. That is a chin that has had balls bouncing off it. I mean, just saying. Not a criticism, just an observation.Here is a snippet; bu5t's unedited face. Apparently, all the faces of him you see until today were enhanced with AI. His mustache hairs and his philtrum are more apparent in the photo, confirming that this is at least the most original variant that exists.
While everyone else is acting like it's a big revelation that the Sharty/Shploopy/Shlababa is absolutely full of pedoforks, I'm curious about the nuance of "living language" to you.I wouldn't go full "living language" but the un- prefix is obviously a case where the rule is strongly in favor of word generation
blud really didn't get the free toddler rape and torture video this is skibidi fanum tax only in ohio and for the rizzle
Null's rule on pedo jokes rarely failsMuch like the jannies and admins trying to leverage their position (bottom) into becoming e-celebs, this is all much less interesting than you think it is.
Good. Literally no one on that hellsite or it's splinters are just shitposting about CSAM.
If someone (((jokes))) about it, just take them at their word. And half of the user base thinks it's super funny
The dox was made by a colonynigger and CP spammer prokop, who has been spamming the shemmy for a while now, started out with threats of trying to rape scar's little sister to spamming BMT and 'p, trying to take the shemmy down. I wouldn't be suprised if he's one of the people to get arrested if the colony was really fedded, but we can only pray.Scar, a well known namefag who is an admin on soygem.party (the shemmy) was supposedly doxed.
The two sites are engaged in conflict over the legitimacy of the dox and allegations that scar uses discord.