Standardized Profile
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2018
Why would Jem'Hadar have gametes? Or the organs necessary for insemination with said gametes?Jem'Hadar father, Klingon mother.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would Jem'Hadar have gametes? Or the organs necessary for insemination with said gametes?Jem'Hadar father, Klingon mother.
In my head canon Starfleet just stitched the Jem’Hadar’s junk back on so he could hook up with a Klingon, who TF cares.Why would Jem'Hadar have gametes? Or the organs necessary for insemination with said gametes?
How is that any different from what he's done the entire time?This is Kurtzman's final fuck you to the fans
Fuck you for not loving my shit
Fuck you for not watching my shit
Fuck you for not believing in my shit
Fuck you for telling me I'm shit
He's slashing and burning on his way out.
I really don't get this mindset, is this just modern progressivism mindrot, a pure and unfettered hatred for everything of the past? Is this some jewish hatred of the western white man's achievements, practically ingrained in their DNA at this point? Are they just really sad, sad little nepo people that just didn't grow up?
I don't know, this shit happens after THE BURN, which I personally hated as a story telling hook. I'm one of the few who liked the idea of a deeper study of the feudalism of Klingons that happened early in Discovery. Before the time travel crap, it was a smaller, more intimate Trek, which was kind of cool. No one else liked it (having a dedicated main character in Star Trek sucks. It's best as an ensemble show. Also, weird Klingon design is weird.) So they did the silly time travel crap to end that story, and make a 'new and better one.' Maybe the Jem'Hadar, in a thousand years time, figured out how to do the horizontal mambo.Why would Jem'Hadar have gametes? Or the organs necessary for insemination with said gametes?
No, you don't. The ruins serve as a fine replacement of the well constructed thing. From the perspective of the Hollywood retards, the normies don't deserve anything well written anyway, plus this "fuck the past, fuck capitalism, fuck white people"-shit appeals to the revolutionary instinct that tells people that the world isn't what it's supposed to be. The TV telling them that everything is shit and needs to be burned to the ground has the interesting effect that the audience doesnt go out there hanging politicians and bankers from the next lampposts.I never understood this quote though. If you are going to kill the past, don't you have to replace the future with... Anything? They seem to be incapable of doing this.
Oh god, they did see how much people liked Bortus and tried to ape it. For an attempt for a one off chuckle(I hope).But then they wouldn't have their poorly-disguised Bortus rip-off.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=M51CCeoV418
Then you will be happy to hear they have already filmed Season 2.I think it's been mentioned but Jesus Christ, Holly Hunter can not act or enunciate. Nor the fat one.
Ok, I give up. I made it 32 minutes. I survived Discovery and Picard but... I just can't.
Academy also shows one of the many problems with New Star Trek, that has been replicated across various entries in the New Star Trek franchise, the bridges on these ships on newer shows are huge with stations and crew way too far apart. The original series' Enterprise bridge was efficiently designed, any crew member could reach any other's station in a few steps, orders could be given across the bridge at conversational-level volume, and the main viewscreen wasn't huge but also located seemingly yards away.
Besides being pointlessly large, these New Star Trek bridges have a lot of unnecessary lighting, more akin to a nightclub than a Starfleet vessel. It's just one sign of a franchise where the worst ideas and design philosophies and dialogue get repeated throughout every new show.
Who wants female Jemmies when we have female Vortas?
View attachment 8438785
Yes, but Garak is a professional and you become gay if there was a good reason for it.The problem with this idea is garak is exceptionally good at reading people. Its what he does. He's not incompetent enough to mistake the stations number one horndog, who is practically trying to hump jadzias leg at every opportunity, as gay. It would be astoundingly out of character
It's commie gobbledygook. It's the true meaning of the "deconstruction". They pretend to know better than the original creators so they break the toys and make something ugly out of it.
This was funny because Shatner was barely acting. That's actually his real attitude.
Modern liberals have a real problem with this. Something to them about a womanizer makes their brains do the "ARACHNOPHOBIC? YOU MUST SECRETLY WANT TO FUCK SPIDERS!" thing. There's no more real example than what they did with Iceman over in the X-Men comics.and that isn't even getting into the whole bashir isn't gay either and was obsessed with every woman who gave him the time of day. He was basically the geordi of ds9, except less of a loser outside his technical field
It's a consequence of a feminist society that dictates our rules. Bashir ain't even a womanizer. He's a young man with a normal libido who wants to have a sexual partner. He's not as bad as Riker, but I wonder if it's a bit of projection here because Riker is a chad while Bashir is presented more a comic relief and a loser. It's a self hating thing.Modern liberals have a real problem with this. Something to them about a womanizer makes their brains do the "ARACHNOPHOBIC? YOU MUST SECRETLY WANT TO FUCK SPIDERS!" thing.
And he's even more promiscuous now that he's gay. These same people writing stuff like this only mind that characters are like this when they're heterosexual males.There's no more real example than what they did with Iceman over in the X-Men comics.
View attachment 8441680
My best guess.How is that any different from what he's done the entire time?
View attachment 8438975
But seriously... It's this.
I never understood this quote though. If you are going to kill the past, don't you have to replace the future with... Anything? They seem to be incapable of doing this.
It's a consequence of a feminist society that dictates our rules. Bashir ain't even a womanizer. He's a young man with a normal libido who wants to have a sexual partner. He's not as bad as Riker, but I wonder if it's a bit of projection here because Riker is a chad while Bashir is presented more a comic relief and a loser. It's a self hating thing.
Also, most characters Riker flirts with exist for the reason of Riker having sex with them. Dax is a character on her own and most females written in that time are annoyed by male sexuality because they were written by men and women who find male sexuality either annoying or aggressive and dangerous, like beta males.
And he's even more promiscuous now that he's gay. These same people writing stuff like this only mind that characters are like this when they're heterosexual males.
Then you will be happy to hear they have already filmed Season 2.
Yeah there is a huge difference between old star trek and new
https://youtube.com/watch?v=rnlxugk3Qb0