@Allanon
It seems like the various things I'm hearing about Roddenberry is that he's not particularly good at managing a franchise, much as he wasn't particularly great at writing science fiction. That he ended up credited with one of the biggest science fiction franchises in history is an amusing accident, apparently.
Roddenberry was one of the most flawed SF magnates pretty much ever. Just about all of the episodes he personally wrote for TOS are horrible, including the fantastically stupid The Omega Glory which is my pick for the worst episode of TOS. There's also Turnabout Intruder which hates women so much it really gets uncomfortable even for the people who don't have a single woke bone in their body (it was written during a nasty divorce). He was also a sex addict who did drugs constantly, flip-flopped on his politics back and forth, and even wrote lyrics to the TOS theme that were never used just so he could cheat himself into getting royalties for them.
Still, its worth noting that the entire reason we're even having this pages long discussion about what is or isn't canon and the merits of it is because Roddenberry actually defied convention at the time of TNG and even
had a strict canon policy in the first place. Neckbeards and nerds didn't really have these kind of restrictive arguments about what episodes of a TV show and what supplemental materials counted as canon until Roddenberry started making decrees about the subject. Specifically, one of the patient zeros was Franz Joseph's
Starfleet Technical Manual which was written by a good friend of Roddenberry's, only for the two to have a falling out years later and for Roddenberry to suddenly declare the whole thing non-canon. Then TNG's canon policy got into the weeds of whether or not TAS and even some of TOS was canon and the whole convention of arguing about what did or didn't really happen in the Star Trek universe became part of the franchise.
I don't know shit about comic books so maybe they pioneered the whole arguing about canon thing but from what I can tell it didn't make the jump into TV/movieland until Trek started doing it.
I think it's a shame that people generally separate the visual mediums like TV and movies from everything else, as you say. I feel like that's a prejudice that existed from the time Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was written, where people who watch TV just sit and drool and are physically incapable of ingesting anything higher effort. Most franchises can be improved by including at least some of their written work as canon.
Its true that there are some really good stories overlooked in EUs, but at the same time it is kind of an obvious problem that giving people homework or lists of obscure media they need to track down just to bring themselves up to speed is rather inconvenient. I've read/played a lot of the supplemental material for Star Trek, but I've been into Trek basically my whole life. For a newcomer, they're just going to want to watch the show.
Sometimes its the opposite, there are STO fans out there who've never watched a single episode because they prefer to play videogames and get bored if they have to sit still for 700 hours or however long the total runtime of the shows is.
To be fair this is also how I feel about Picard. It's never going to be canon to me no matter what the company says. If I ignore the whole Mikey Spock thing, I can accept Discovery as just a really lame entry into canon, but Picard contradicts and tramples over so much of existing canon and provides no benefit in return -- that I simply cannot accept it as canon. It's a self-deleting paradox.
Oh, don't misunderstand me, I don't remotely consider NuTrek to be canon at all. I actually have a hard time even accepting Enterprise into canon because it contradicts TOS on a lot of fronts that I just can't ignore, like holodecks showing up fairly early on, the not-phasers and not-photon torpedoes instead of more conventional weaponry, the Temporal Cold War plot when the entire point of Enterprise was to get away from superadvanced tech, Romulan ships already having cloaking devices, and most of all those god damned knife-shaped nacelles that both the Klingons and Romulans use that look more like they belong with 24th century Dominion tech than anything else.
Enterprise is likeable and there are some parts of it I enjoy and would gladly consider canon, but there are parts of it that are just too ridiculous to take seriously. Kind of like TAS, though I acknowledge I have a much more generous opinion of TAS than most people do.
If I'm gonna be a hardass about STO's plotline I'm definitely not giving NuTrek a pass just because its on TV. NuTrek has pretty much shown everyone involved that there aren't really any canon rules anymore and its just up to each individual fan to pick and choose whatever they want to accept as part of the franchise. Some kind of split like this was probably inevitable since STO's fanbase is rather dedicated, but NuTrek pretty much made the split immediate and inarguable.
and I recall reading at some point that in s1 they weren't allowed to use star ship interiors that had the look and feel of TNG ships due to licensing reasons
I think this is still just a rumor that nobody has been able to prove. I honestly think it gives Kurtzman too much credit though, I'm dead certain he had full freedom to use the old look of the shows and just threw it out the window because he wanted his fuckugly IKEA Genius Bar look.