As I continue to watch the Original series one of the things I've noticed is how characters disagree with their superior officers. Like you mentioned Spock confronts Kirk on his quest for vengeance but he does so in a professional way, saying that if Kirks obsession affects the lives of the crew Spock will be forced to take command for the good of the ship. Similarly in the Doomsday Machine episode Spock regains control of the ship by calmly pointing out that the Admirals mental state is not fit for command and he will have McCoy medically diagnose him as suicidal and unfit for command. In the episode where Kirk goes full Ahab on the energy cloud both Spock and McCoy confront him over his obsessions saying he is behaving irrational and putting their lives at risk and how he is better than this.
Compare this to most modern media where if someone disagrees with their superior its usually in an aggressive manner usually pulling a gun on them and shouting at them how they are wrong while trying to convince everyone else to join them in their mutiny. I've seen some clips of STD and in it Michael is physically assaulting her Captain and people arrogantly talk down to their superiors, just telling them to their face they are wrong and the hero is always right. This is in contrast to TOS where characters confront Kirk not because they think they're right but because they think Kirk is going down a dark path and he's a better person than that.
There's a scene from TNG that shows this very well:
They are very calm about it, respect each other and resolve it in private. I always loved that scene, the way how they treat each other is just nice to watch.
In STD and STP, you wonder if there even is a chain of command, cause anyone can do anything without being punished, it's a madhouse.
Also, watching the first few episodes of STD, the one time someone does something that gets them punished, it's Burnham, who is accused of starting a war with the Klingons, even though they instigated it all.
This video puts it into context as well:
I can't wrap my head around this at all. They want to make him look like a fool and her like a quirky, spunky STRONK WAHMAN, but they achieve the opposite. She's an arrogant bitch, she doesn't even allow him to make a statement and then there's the subtle thing: He never interrupts her speech, but she never lets him finish even just one sentence.
If that chick is a captain, she must be the worst one I've seen, she'd get along nicely with Holdo from Star Wars.
Too bad, the actress is pretty good and she looks cute, but damn, this is a terrible screenplay.
The writers read Hamlet, saw some of the main themes behind it, and rewrote a more optimistic version of the story. I can't see modern TV doing anything like that today.
What, some racist old white guy? His works hardly include any PoC at all! And no trannies or gays!
If they read it, their first instinct would be to look for the most iconic character and turn them into a gay quadriplegic muslim tranny in a wheelchair. Their next instinct would be how to invalidate everything within that story, to piss off the original fans of it. Their attitude towards creation isn't love, it's spite.