These are bad examples. Rachel Garret from a different time period interacting with "modern day" Picard?
That was entirely my point though. The starfleet uniform has *clearly* changed many times over the years. It literally changed multiple times over the course of TNG alone. I still don't get why the uniform change from TNG to DS9 was your hill to die on here. At least TNG and DS9 as shows both managed to keep the uniforms internally consistent.
Hell, and I even went back to check this just now, Sisko is wearing a contemporary (for the time) TNG uniform in opening scenes of DS9, and O'Brien is already wearing the original DS9 uniform in the same scene. That even makes some sense in context, O'Brien says he has already been on DS9 for several days at this point, Sisko is just now showing up.
Trek Uniforms *obviously* change in universe, fairly often even. I admittedly don't know why Starfleet wanted a different uniform for their personnel on DS9, but they obviously did. And they at least kept that relatively consistent, until they changed it again...
DS9 just said fuck it to continuity. For some unexplained reason, people on this one space station wear different uniforms than the Enterprise-D and the rest of Starfleet. And then Generations kept up the stupidity by using both uniforms at the same time on the Enterprise.
Except everyone on Voyager also wore those exact same uniforms at more or less exactly the same time. If anything, the fact that Voyager had the same uniforms as DS9 was the weird part. I'm not saying that it isn't odd for a paramilitary organization to change their uniforms so many times over so few years, but DS9 wasn't even close to the first time that Starfleet did this, and it wasn't the last. I'm asking again, why is this your hill to die on?
Voyager was isolated from the rest of Starfleet and had an older style uniform.
Sorry I'm setting this out of order, but it made sense to reorder it this way, because I already clearly said why this was stupid. I would have actually agreed that it would make sense for Voyager to keep an "older uniform" even after StarFleet as a whole changed theirs, (as they again have *obviously* done multiple times.) After all, Why would Voyager waste (supposedly limited) replicator energy to change every crew member's uniform when they were many lightyears away from home to begin with?
Except... Voyager's "older style uniform" was literally just DS9's original uniform, the one that you're saying said "fuck it" to continuity. Voyager never even changed their uniform over the course of the show, (that's the reason why the Doctor had the original DS9/Voyager uniform in the same episode where Andy Dick had the second DS9/later TNG Film uniform.) It's the reason why Voyager mostly kept that uniform, except for a few later time travel shenanigans. And I'm ok with that.
Then they had to change AGAIN in First Contact and this time DS9 had to adopt those same uniforms.
DS9 changed their uniforms *once*, and it was as you say, to fit in with the change in First Contact.
Not 'again', *ONCE*. I will freely admit, I don't know why they changed the uniform between TNG and DS9, but that is no more a negative towards DS9 than it was towards TNG when it had different uniforms than TOS did. This is a ridiculous hill to die on.
How many times did TNG change their uniforms, for no reason even?
it was more than once.
And I don't care what you say- In DS9's case, it was a change for the better. I'm no war master, but maybe when you're in the middle of a dangerous war, it makes sense to have everyone in your paramilitary organization wear the same uniforms. I would even agree with you if you said that it was stupid that Starfleet wasn't *already* doing this in the first place... but however you want to spin it, they weren't. Starfleet was kind of stupid in TNG times when you look at it objectively/pragmatically...
I'm convinced Paramount and Playmates toys just wanted to sell new action figures. So change up the uniforms every two years or so.
Yes, and? Even if that's true (and there may even be some truth to it,) I still don't get where you're coming from.
Even if you disagree with me, one film which has multiple actors in the very same scene wearing multiple random costumes that don't at all look right together is clearly worse than 2 entirely different shows having different costume designs, right?