Culture Star Wars' Biggest Problem Is the Fans - Slop Wars: The Rainbow Menace

The internet has never made it easy for people to speak their minds. Convenience of digital connection aside, there have always been online trolls and toxic comments ready to pounce on anyone who dares to bare their authentic self in public life, and the newest round of controversies and unfounded criticisms directed at Star Wars projects demonstrates that the beloved sci-fi franchise is no different. For decades, viewers have been relentlessly attacking Star Wars performers and creators, with the renewed push against TV shows like The Acolyte demonstrating the venom with which a particular set of audience members scrutinize everyone's favorite galaxy. The vitriol of these persistent voices has subsequently spread throughout the internet, making it feel impossible to say anything positive about Star Wars without turning every discussion into a heated debate.

The unacceptable abuse that Star Wars' prequel-era actors like Ahmed Best received from fans in the late '90s and early 2000s has been well-documented, and since then, negative Star Wars voices have only been amplified by the mainstream spread of social media. Leslye Headland's groundbreaking series has been relentlessly review-bombed online, causing The Acolyte to possess a huge disparity between its positive critical reception and abysmal audience score on aggregate websites like Rotten Tomatoes. Since the majority of these hate-filled criticisms are either overreactions to alleged continuity errors within the Star Wars universe or backlash aimed at attacking the show's long-overdue inclusivity, the bad actors spreading them are clearly spinning controversy out of nothing, and this manufactured outrage can be directly traced back to the demographics of the original trilogy.

The Original Star Wars Movies Were a Product of a Different Time
Given the franchise's current popularity, it's hard to believe there was ever a time when no one on earth had ever watched one of George Lucas's Star Wars movies. The first film in the original trilogy, originally just titled Star Wars upon its 1977 release, was shown to the public during a decade of classic hits like Steven Spielberg's Jaws in 1975 and Rocky in 1976. This was a time when Hollywood relied almost exclusively on traditional tropes to tell stories exclusively through a Euro-centric, white male lens. Protagonists were almost always played up as ultra-masculine tough guys, while supporting casts typically consisted of domestic female characters or problematic stereotypes, and as films released during this insulated time period, the original Star Wars movies are often construed as possessing a similarly narrow narrative focus.

Despite taking place in a galaxy far, far away from the filmmaking conventions of Earth, Star Wars' original trilogy features a mostly white cast, female characters with largely unrealized potential, and no LGBTQ+ storylines depicted onscreen. While powerful female leaders like Mon Mothma and Carrie Fisher's iconic Princess Leia are outspoken forces for good in the trilogy, the latter's relationship with the Force and her father is glossed over in favor of her brother, and Leia's infamous bikini scene at Jabba's palace in Star Wars: Return of the Jedi feels like fodder for a generation of male fantasies. Yet, the original trilogy's premise still feels magical to watch and provided formative memories for many of Star Wars' older fans, creating such an impact on viewers' minds that many still consider the first three movies the definitive guide to the Star Wars experience. Unfortunately, this mindset's reliance on the original trilogy's outdated aesthetics severely limits the understanding of what a Star Wars story can be.


Modern Star Wars Projects Have Expanded the Universe While Battling Online Hate
In the aftermath of the original trilogy's popularity, Star Wars broadened its appeal to accommodate an entirely new generation of fans to the franchise. The prequels' Queen Padmé Amidala (Natalie Portman) made up for the original movies' oversight by showcasing a powerful, fictional queen whose bravery and political wisdom competed with the likes of Count Dooku (Christopher Lee) and then-Chancellor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid), and the introduction of Ahsoka (Ashley Eckstein) in 2007's Star Wars: The Clone Wars gave younger viewers a powerful heroine to grow up with. Increased efforts at telling diverse Star Wars stories came when Disney purchased Lucasfilm in 2012, though many of the Mouse House's Star Wars releases have been marred by online hate.

While Disney did make some decisions that caused legitimate controversy within the Star Wars fandom, such as removing the beloved Legends continuity from canon, many alleged controversies of this time period unfolded because problematic Star Wars viewers chose outrage over trying to understand change. The narrative quality of Disney's Sequel trilogy aside, the movies' progressive decision to hire Daisy Ridley as Rey and John Boyega as Finn marked important firsts for the franchise's leads. Yet, these casting decisions also resulted in constant online harassment for both actors in the aftermath of their performances, with many detractors trying to drag Star Wars back to a less inclusive past.

Flash forward to The Last Jedi's release in 2017, and this online hate reached a fever pitch. Kelly Marie Tran's heartwarming performance as Rose Tico drew the ire of a racist internet horde, causing Tran to quit Instagram in order to look out for her mental health. Disney, admittedly, did not handle the backlash well. Not only did the final film in the sequel trilogy, 2019's The Rise of Skywalker, greatly reduce Rose's screentime, but the brief lesbian kiss featured in the background at the very end of the movie felt disappointing for audience members who waited so long for sincere queer storylines. In this instance, it felt like the most vocal opponents of the sequels' central performances had won.

The Future of Star Wars Should Be Focused on Representation and Inclusivity
Thankfully, the most recent installments in the Star Wars universe have built upon the franchise's contemporary legacy by including more representative storylines in an age of digital hate. The lesbian relationship between Vel Sartha (Faye Marsey) and Cinta Kaz (Varada Sethu) in Andor marks an important step forward for LGBTQ+ inclusion in Star Wars, as does the relationship between Osha and Mae's mothers in The Acolyte. Likewise, Kelly Marie Tran's 2018 article in the New York Times demonstrates that performers can reclaim their stories by publicly disavowing those who only have the courage to tear others down in private, providing an inspiring example of how actors can stand up to Star Wars' most toxic audience members.

As the bigoted campaigns against Obi-Wan Kenobi's Moses Ingram and The Acolyte prove, Star Wars' online hate isn't going away anytime soon. Therefore, it's up to Star Wars creatives to boldly navigate the turbulent waters of the beloved franchise's fandom. In a recent interview with the New York Times, Lucasfilm President Kathleen Kennedy herself acknowledged that women in Star Wars are often subject to audience attacks because of the franchise's vocal male fanbase, as well as espousing her belief that "storytelling needs to be representative of all people." This sentiment echoes the similar views of both Headland and director Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy, who is set to helm Star Wars' upcoming solo Rey film. In an interview with Variety, Chinoy expressed her appreciation for the franchise's passionate fan base, but she also acknowledged it's best for her to "drown out those voices" in order to tell her stories.

This delicate balance between creating Star Wars content and maneuvering around its most toxic elements highlights one of the most difficult struggles facing the franchise today. The most vocal viewers of the franchise wield the power of the internet in order to push a bigoted agenda that originates from the prejudices of an earlier time, while mainstream Star Wars content has grown to produce meaningful narratives while being bogged down by hate in the background. Opinions about Star Wars have grown so loud because both sides are vying for rhetorical victory, but at the end of the day, these controversies are unnecessary. True fans understand that the Star Wars universe is a sci-fi wonderland where anything can happen and anyone belongs, and the future looks bright for those who have already opened up their minds to the compassion that all audience members should have learned a long time ago.

The Acolyte is currently streaming on Disney+ in the U.S. New episodes air every Tuesday.

 
If the first things I hear about a piece of media is is how "inclusive" it is, instead of how cool/fun/entertaining/well-written it is - it's a waste of time. If all you have to recommend your product is diversity, you have a shitty product. If the story and characters suck, the basics of entertainment were failed.
it's basically everything about why Christian Media is dogshit
it can't stand on its own as Media so it needs the modifier to run, Christian, Inclusive, whatever
 
I couldn't get through the whole article because I got too disgusted. I'm so sick and tired of these political hacks dismissing the valid criticisms of Disney Wars. We are talking about something that many, many people loved dearly. A universe that people were passionate about. A world that many fans wrapped their whole lives around. A piece of art that brought generations together, that parents passed on to their children like an heirloom, and that inspired countless children and adults alike to broaden their imaginations. It brought people into the film industry and broke new ground in several areas, especially in special effects. It had a massive, dedicated, loyal fan base from all walks of life, classes, races, sexes, and religions.

George Lucas and the people who helped him create Star Wars were able to foster such a large, passionate fan base because they themselves were deeply passionate about what they were creating, and they were dedicated to making something that would entertain anyone and everyone from a five year old kid, to great grampa and gramma. And they were successful in doing so because they made a timeless story (those "tired old tropes" the author dismisses) and found the most capable and talented people they could to bring it to life.

The problem with Disney Wars, and what most fans are pissed off about, is that the people behind it now at every level (aside from very few exceptions, like Favreu) absolutely don't give a shit about Star Wars, or even outright HATE it. Most of the people behind Disney Wars are talentless, unskilled hacks and diversity hires who see themselves as political activists shaping culture, not people who want to make the best quality entertainment they possibly can. So they take something extremely popular and beloved like Star Wars and they have to "reimagine it for a modern audience" (that doesn't exist) by filling it full of current day bullshit. By doing so they automatically make the project dated, because politics and cultural standards are always changing.

Years from now, if people watch Disney Wars, they will ask themselves "Why did they put this crap in there? Why does that character look like a man in drag? Why are all the white males either evil, or incompetent morons? Why is that female character already perfect at everything? This shit is boring and unrealistic." They'll see it and be able to peg it to this time period. Good art is timeless. It can be enjoyed by anyone at any time because it doesn't have a bunch of bullshit stuffed into it that can be tied to the time period that it was made. Art made for and of the period it was made, for the "modern audience" current to that time period, is timely and dated. Like when you watch an old sitcom that's making fun of Gerald Ford or Saturday Night Live doing a skit about the first George Bush. Sure, people who were alive back then might get a laugh seeing it again, but anyone born after that period just won't get it and it will take them out of the experience.

The thing about anything that develops a loyal fandom around it, whether that's Star Wars, 40k, Star Trek, Harry Potter, Fallout, Metal Gear...the old fans bring the new fans with tthem. They old fans share it with their kids, their friends, their nieces and nephews, who then fall in love with it and become fans themselves. This bullshit about "modern audiences" is just that: bullshit. Those people that are being referenced when you hear about the "modern audience" are such a small minority and so niche that they would not be able to keep a property like Star Wars financially successful like it was in the past, because that property now excludes and disinterests so many people.

Had Disney handled Star Wars with respect to the canon, honored what came before, and made sure that it was being created with people who love the universe and want to remain faithful to it and the characters, and with the only objective being making the best quality entertainment they possibly could, then they'd still have a fan base. Any time there is an established canon and fan base, both must be respected and guarded, because if you lose the fans then you'll lose your profit, and you'll lose the fans by ruining canon. It's clear that virtually no one at Disney gives a damn about Star Wars. They took the most successful piece of pop culture and sacrificed it on the altar of political messaging. They destroyed canon to the point that people who once deeply, passionately cared for that world so much now care so little for it that they're only around to laugh at it's numerous failures.
 
Had Disney handled Star Wars with respect to the canon, honored what came before, and made sure that it was being created with people who love the universe and want to remain faithful to it and the characters, and with the only objective being making the best quality entertainment they possibly could, then they'd still have a fan base.
This right here is part of why Top Gun: Maverick was so successful. Minimal-to-nonexistent broadcasting of "The Message™", and a dedicated, skilled, passionate team with one goal in mind: to make an entertaining movie that everyone could enjoy. They respected the original and what made it so fun, got a lot of the original people involved, and even used some of the same shooting locations.

It was a fun movie that didn't try to be anything other than that. And they made truckloads of money for their efforts.
 
This article isn't worth the time but skimming a few points out of it. I think most of the criticism of Jar Jar Binks was of the goofiness of the character rather than the actor BUT, so far as Ahmed Best did actually get criticised, I seem to recall it was mainly proto-Progressives complaining that he was racist for the Jamaican-adjacent accent he did. The whole "cultural appropriation" thing. So it's a bit rich for the heirs of those same people to now blame others for any abuse the actor received.

Also, blaming the audience for them not liking your show is never a good idea.
 
In other words they fucked up every star wars project they touched, don't understand why and blame people for not liking it and put all the blame on them

ffs the idiots in charge of star wars these days act like fucking troons. At this rate they'll keep doing it until they kill the franchise entirely
 
I tried watching andor which I was told was the least woke of all the nuwars series.

It was incredibly boring and generic, like all nuwars crap is when you stop focusing on the propaganda. And that's the problem, even if you remove the woke from nuwars its still shit, andor itself barely felt like starwars at all, there were only hints in some of the aesthetics but remove that and its any other scifi series.

When you watch the pre-disney starwars even with the prequels you can see this stuff is made by people who care. The nuwars on the other hand is pure manufactured slop, the people involved are so dispassionate about this that it seeps into their work, you can fell when watching andor how little they care.

And this is the high bar of nuwars mind you...
It's hard to believe that anyone is still engaging with this "debate", if you can even call it that.
Because rageclicks are still clicks, its been true for over a decade.

Same with ragewatching, you think the guys who do market analysis don't factor for that? think again...
1720052259008.png
He looks like the kind of guy who always volunteers to babysit his niece...

"Uncle touchy".
 
Star Wars was always bad, the story was bad, the "message" was bad, the acting, casting and special effects were bad. The movies inserted enough Muppet type bullshit to appeal to children but not enough to turn off Adults.
It was a gimmick in 1970s, most "fans" were children and sometimes the parents that took said children to watch those movies.
The prequals were those children all grown up now taking their children to watch them.
Like most things pop-culture in 2024, it's man/woman children trying to hang on to the nostalgia of their Youth when they were much happier and the fact that they fear their boring lives they live now. Same can be said for all the 40 year-olds who still are into comic books and marvel movies.
These things are literally the High-Fructose Corn Syrup of media and art.
 
What do you like? It's entertainment, not some kind of deep commentary FFS.
I'm sure he's got some kind of snooty avant-garde drivel he likes to peruse.

But sometimes people just want escapism. That's the problem with Star Wars now. It's no longer escapism. It has to be all about the DIVERSITY and REPRESENTATION. A number of posters here have commented on how popular entertainment in general has suffered because the writers aren't writing to entertain, or even have fun -- they're activists and they're writing to preach.

And the last thing people want to do after a long week of RL bullshit is turn on the TV or go to the movies and get MORE RL bullshit ladled out to them. Who wants to deal with that? So they vote with their dollars and their remotes and fuck off to something else.
 
Leslye Headland's groundbreaking series has been relentlessly review-bombed online, causing The Acolyte to possess a huge disparity between its positive critical reception and abysmal audience score on aggregate websites like Rotten Tomatoes. Since the majority of these hate-filled criticisms are either overreactions

Hiring Carrie-Ann Moss to be a Jedi only to kill her 5 minutes into the show is such a dick move that it must be intentional malice against the fanbase at this point.
 
Back