Starfield - Bethesda's new space IP: will probably be full of fun and easily trackable bugs

How do you think Starfield will turn out?

  • Total voters
    971
Potatoherder said:
I am glad they learned from fo4 and removed the player voice. That completely crippled quest mods in fo4. Though i have major doubts about modding as Hines came out and said Starfield was "the most moddable game ever."

Lots of concerns on the physics engine and the UI format as if they changed enough there simply aren't tools to modify those. All the guys who did the heavy lifting for this stuff have either left the scene or are under contract with game companies and can't help if they wanted. Common view with the modders i know is the community simple doesn't have the ability to do a script extender if it takes any serious reverse engineering.
Click to expand...
If you think the game is going to be so bad to the point your only concern is if the modders will be able to fix it, what is the point of even playing this shit?
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Moths, DOUBLE_WHEEL, Soup Sammiches and 2 others
Bethesda continuing to make no sense to me. They give review codes to basically everyone weeks out before launch meaning people have plenty of time to actually complete the game and do thorough reviews, but then still have the review embargo hold until literally just hours before launch. I know they traditionally do these late embargoes, but given the absolute fucking shitshow that was Redfall's release you'd think if Starfield really is that good they'd want that news out there ASAP.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr, Total Annihilation, Exterminatus and 3 others
East_Clintwood said:
Bethesda continuing to make no sense to me. They give review codes to basically everyone weeks out before launch meaning people have plenty of time to actually complete the game and do thorough reviews, but then still have the review embargo hold until literally just hours before launch. I know they traditionally do these late embargoes, but given the absolute fucking shitshow that was Redfall's release you'd think if Starfield really is that good they'd want that news out there ASAP.
Click to expand...
I think they're going to publish reviews a week before in advance, plus the word of mouth from the early access users will generate hype for the game
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Total Annihilation and TVB
CyrusHowler said:
You literally follow me around from thread to thread posting clips of the Simpsons or SlobLetterMedia telling me to shut up. THAT’S rent free.

True tbh. This place isn’t very good for one’s mental health. At least not the gaming threads.
Click to expand...
>"y-y-you keep replying to me waaah waaah"
And you still continue to use me as someone rent free in your mind. Don't act as if I'm the one following your antics as if I'm some kind of drone. So kindly keep coping and seething, dude. Please try to ignore me, there is a feature on KF for you to ignore me.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Begemot
East_Clintwood said:
Bethesda continuing to make no sense to me. They give review codes to basically everyone weeks out before launch meaning people have plenty of time to actually complete the game and do thorough reviews, but then still have the review embargo hold until literally just hours before launch. I know they traditionally do these late embargoes, but given the absolute fucking shitshow that was Redfall's release you'd think if Starfield really is that good they'd want that news out there ASAP.
Click to expand...
this way it's assumed people play more of it before they can post a review, instead of trying to trip over each other I PLAYED 10 MINUTES OF STARFIELD AMA SPOILER IT'S GOTY 10/10
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Total Annihilation, TVB and Super Hans v2
"Todd, no offense man, that's a good game."

Uhhh...

It kind of sounds like he hates it but he knows that the retards on reddit who are following him now for leaking it would lose their shit if he said that. "It's a different kind of game, you gotta read, it's swift and has good moves, etc. etc."

It's the kind of shit the guys I know who bought the PS5 and never play games say about every game they purchase that they never play.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Moths, DOUBLE_WHEEL, Rotollo 2 and 2 others
I have yet to put in my thoughts on Starfield, so here we go:

I think the game is going to be a tad bit deeper when it comes to rpg choices(no mc voice fuck that shit) than fallout 4, but with combat closer to Far Cry in space, which I think that was what Fallout 4 really wanted to be
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: More AWS-8Q Than You and Total Annihilation
General Emílio Médici said:
We have neither Turians, nor Quarians. We don't even have Asari level horny bait. If I wanted some generic mutt women porn I can just type booba on AI generation and get some random thot.
Click to expand...
Look, if you think Quarians are hotter than Asari, you need to get your eyes and/or libido checked.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Begemot, Moths, not william stenchever and 1 other person
Snekposter said:
Look, if you think Quarians are hotter than Asari, you need to get your eyes and/or libido checked.
Click to expand...

Asari appeal to the most common denominator and simplest standard. They are hot, but that is a given with such a human appearance. It feels like they tried too hard. Quarians are the thinking man's choice as they offer a subtler experience and more refined appeal. Also they come with in-built bondage gear.

xXx: State of the Union said:
It's the "I want to fuck robots but don't want to admit it." choice
Click to expand...

Joke is on you I am fully willing to admit that.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Begemot, Wright, More AWS-8Q Than You and 1 other person
Flexo said:
Even though we are so hot I understand we're irresistible (flinging DNA at someone without permission though is not cool)
Click to expand...
Hot as in fiery hot that can burn the processor?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Flexo
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back