State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[Dartos Cremaster]

no bodycam footage

So that’s it, we’re felted. Basically all charges dropped and cucked out of our bodycam footage. Nick wins.

Hopefully he turns his life around and actually raises his kids, but let’s be honest, Montagraph will probably win since Rekieta has quintupled down on his statements and that will fuck him over, and there is a non-zero chance that celebration cocaine and more shitty group tattoos are already being purchased.

 

[Warm Lasagna]

quintupled down

That’s the thing, he HAS to quintuple down on his words. To pull up now and say that what he said was not true is a kiss of death to his defense. He’s locked himself into a path that leads to his defeat in court.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Nick is a public figure. Doesn't the public have compelling interest in the bodycam footage after Nick said Wisconsin CPS is corrupt and perjurers? The visible state of his crack den is pertinent. Probably not worth litigating, but still.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Nick is a public figure. Doesn't the public have compelling interest in the bodycam footage after Nick said Wisconsin CPS is corrupt and perjurers? The visible state of his crack den is pertinent. Probably not worth litigating, but still.

In theory you might argue that the state could release it, but in reality the case got very little public coverage by mainstream media and has remained very much confined to its corner of the internet.

The law that allows release of footage is for cases of high public interest, like police shootings, accusations of misbehavior by law enforcement ("that officer raped me your honor!"), and other such volatile topics that could lead to the Niggers rioting and looting.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

accusations of misbehavior by law enforcement ("that officer raped me your honor!"),

"Officer Pomplin falsified the coke hair test and perjured himself," would qualify I'd think.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

In theory you might argue that the state could release it, but in reality the case got very little public coverage by mainstream media and has remained very much confined to its corner of the internet.

The law that allows release of footage is for cases of high public interest, like police shootings, accusations of misbehavior by law enforcement ("that officer raped me your honor!"), and other such volatile topics that could lead to the Niggers rioting and looting.

There also the possibility that only the public in Minnesota matters to the judge. Who gives a fuck if a splatter of anonymous posters and a handful of out of state youtubers have interest in the case?

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

"Officer Pomplin falsified the coke hair test and perjured himself," would qualify I'd think.

Why? Those claims had zero reach and minimal impact on the lives of the citizens of Minnesota.
The case is not impactful enough by far.

Obviously I would want to get the bodycam footage released as much as any Kiwi would, but we have to realistic and not pretend Nick being a faggot is enough to somehow slander the police department.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

In theory you might argue that the state could release it, but in reality the case got very little public coverage by mainstream media and has remained very much confined to its corner of the internet.

The law that allows release of footage is for cases of high public interest, like police shootings, accusations of misbehavior by law enforcement ("that officer raped me your honor!"), and other such volatile topics that could lead to the Niggers rioting and looting.

Your Honor, have you considered that I really really really really want it and have said ‘pretty please’?

 

[Dartos Cremaster]

To pull up now and say that what he said was not true is a kiss of death to his defense

True. Instead of doubling down at the beginning he should have just said: “yeah that isn’t true, just a bad joke I made when shitfaced. Sorry, Monty”. I meant since reiterating his statement continuously a “bad joke when I was shitfaced on a stupid drinking podcast” excuse can’t be used.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Nick is a public figure. Doesn't the public have compelling interest in the bodycam footage after Nick said Wisconsin CPS is corrupt and perjurers? The visible state of his crack den is pertinent. Probably not worth litigating, but still.

He also accused a sheriff/cop of contaminating a child's hair with cocaine. He claimed that the bodycam footage proves it and suggested that he might eventually show this evidence. One would think it's only fair to publish all the bodycam footage for full context after reading such allegations.

https://archive.is/Iqsky

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/g6D2X

Source (timestamped): https://youtu.be/TbWoVtJqKpQ?t=6611

"I have on bodycam one of the sheriffs actually touching my daughter's hair with gloves that had just handled bags of cocaine. And then there's like, oh, you exposed your daughter to cocaine. I'm like, I never fucking did. Not a chance. And I think she may have accidentally been exposed by this guy, but there's no way for me to prove it or anything. But I do have it on bodycam. And so I have to like talk about how this can happen at some point. Again, this isn't the right place. My show isn't the right place, but it will be addressed at some point. And there's a ton of stuff out there. And I have an expert who agrees that can be the cause of this thing."

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

He also accused a sheriff/cop of contaminating a child's hair with cocaine. He claimed that the bodycam footage proves it and suggested that he might eventually show this evidence.

If you can get a mainstream media outlet to cover these accusations there might be a realistic chance that the footage is released to prove the contrary.

But it is entirely possible that there is a moment where an officer touches his kid's head, giving credence to his claim without additional explanations about the testing methods for cocaine, such as that transfer of the specific metabolite from cocaine to the hair is impossible by the nature of what metabolite is tested for.

So without a proper and extensive explanation by experts why Nick Rekieta is a fucking liar, I do not see any point in the state getting into a mud slinging contest with the faggot retard.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Idea for new thread poll:

How long will Nick abide by his terms of probation?

A. LMAO! He will go back to snorting and drinking then get caught almost immediately.

B. He will go back to his old ways immediately, but keep it on the Q and T.

C. He will resist for a while, hence succumb to addiction and get caught.

D. He True and Honest luvs him keeds and won't jeopardise that, so he quits

E. The divorce arc will come first before probation violation

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Let's get real here. I do not know where you live but where I live some of the shit CPS finds it so vile and disgusting, you have to put Nick's neglect into perspective and ask where you want CPS to actually be for the real shit. what happened with Nick's kids is way down the bottom of the list of the shit they see and deal with.
Like all first time offenses, they give opportunities and why would you destroy a family unless you had to? Unless you have to?

Stay tuned, because Nick hasn't finished fucking up yet.

Agree with you, except that I maintain it is the criminal who destroys his family in a case like this, not the government.

Where a parent working is critical for children to remain in a home, get their Level 1 Maslow needs met, etc., then I can agree that sending someone away, or even sticking them with a felony conviction that could cripple their hireability or earning power in the future, should be put into context and consequence to others. But here? Nick is not critical to his kids' having food, shelter, or stability (which is fortunate, because he doesn't provide that).

In principle, sure: family together good, not abusing drugs or fucking other people in your home you share with children good, parents growing up and redeeming themselves good. But if we're picking and choosing who deserves a break or not, basically no compelling reason for Nick to get a break, compared.

That’s the thing, he HAS to quintuple down on his words. To pull up now and say that what he said was not true is a kiss of death to his defense. He’s locked himself into a path that leads to his defeat in court.

What defense? There is no defense when you agree to a plea.

 

[Bunkerhousing]

There also the possibility that only the public in Minnesota matters to the judge. Who gives a fuck if a splatter of anonymous posters and a handful of out of state youtubers have interest in the case?

More people know about this case than CNN regular viewer numbers.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

More people know about this case than CNN regular viewer numbers.

That's not really saying much.

 

[AnOminous]

If you can get a mainstream media outlet to cover these accusations there might be a realistic chance that the footage is released to prove the contrary.

Absolutely nobody (mainstream) has shown interest in covering these accusations, much less endorsing them, probably because they're so obviously the scabrous lies from a diseased mind. If every single lying criminal saying "I wuz framed" was enough to release footage, there wouldn't even be a rule.

I do hope Null takes a shot at it, even if chances may not be great. Or they may be more amenable to a request from a more "respectable" outlet like Law & Crime. After all, we're basically seen, at best, as a bunch of Internet assholes who exist to defame people, which is kind of true, even if we try to keep the defamation as based on truth and actual documentation as possible.

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

I have on bodycam one of the sheriffs actually touching my daughter's hair with gloves that had just handled bags of cocaine.

Uh huh.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Absolutely nobody (mainstream) has shown interest in covering these accusations, much less endorsing them, probably because they're so obviously the scabrous lies from a diseased mind. If every single lying criminal saying "I wuz framed" was enough to release footage, there wouldn't even be a rule.

Exactly, which is why there is no reason to get into a shit-flinging contest with a retard. The Gubernment is above such concerns.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Please find attached the transcript of Nicholas Rekieta's 01/24/2025 Plea Deal Hearing. Thank you to everyone who contributed to the fund.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Please find attached the transcript of Nicholas Rekieta's 01/24/2025 Plea Deal Hearing. Thank you to everyone who contributed to the fund.

He really does not want another chemical use study now does he?