Stellar Blade / Project Eve Thread - aka Stellar Ass

People are butthurt about stellar blade being censored because of the double standard; TLOU2, Baldur's Gate 3, etc, had all sorts of grody sex scenes/gore/etc and didn't get touched even a little bit by Sony. Hell, BG3 flat out has bear fucking.
I still don’t know why this concept makes people throw themselves at walls. Even this thread looks like a car accident. It’s such a simple issue.
 
I hope everyone who is mad about this starts to reconsider preordering games before having any confidence in the developer, especally bc this shit is now 70 bucks
not to sound like a boomer btw, but what is the deal with people needed to buy the new shiny shit when they probably have a massive backlog, but I'm one of those people who says PS5/SexBox has no games.
 
Though I've been playing the game and have things to say (now prepared to go to after the second Alpha), I've felt like holding off on posting further until the tangential back-and-forth arguments that have been going on for the past day and six pages die out. I'd rather not have anything I say be immediately buried by more pages of this unrelated nonsense.
So let's talk on topic so there's actually a conversation and not some retards that think yelling "pedo" is somehow a gotcha and not something that has been worn out over the last decade and change like "racist" and "nazi".

Generally-speaking, gamers are not principled people. They can be rallied within the moment, but when no longer prodded to do so, they just devolve back into regular consoomer practices like the nigger-cattle they are.
Not really. At least, not more so than normal people.

The problem is one of incentives. They (what you call nigger cattle) aren't into games to play games, they are into games to talk around the water cooler in the office. I'm seeing this a lot with all the normies discovering Fallout due to the Netflix show.

A great example is how nearly every member of ResetEra suddenly "borrows" or "gets gifted" whatever the latest problematic hit is. Steller Blade included. They say they want the game banned, but the incentive is to play it.

It’s a lot more sleazy to me. I understand men oogling at women, but I find it pathetic to admit that as a man myself. It feels like someone is telling me their masturbation habits and I get grossed out. The tranny and twink shit makes me think something more insidious, though.
Because it is.

There is a subset of extremists on the left and the right that say things like "make straight sex gay" (left) or "having sex with women is gay" (right) and it sounds completely unhinged, but that's only because it is completely unhinged. They've destroyed their brain with contradicting ideology and the jargon that goes with it, they don't realise how insane they sound.

Steller Blade, Tomb Raider, etc. have sexy women because it's hot, and fun. Political nuts do it because they think it'll help them politically, or to groom kids, or even because they thing it's hot but don't have the self restraint to say enough is enough.

The She-Ra cartoon reboot is a perfect example. Made to be less attractive because that's problematic, but in the process made her look like a boy. But while the original series focused on action and adventure, the new series is all about a gay relationship complete with prom and a gay kiss.
 
I hope everyone who is mad about this starts to reconsider preordering games before having any confidence in the developer, especally bc this shit is now 70 bucks
not to sound like a boomer btw, but what is the deal with people needed to buy the new shiny shit when they probably have a massive backlog, but I'm one of those people who says PS5/SexBox has no games.
i learned that lesson with fucking cyberpunk 2077, there is no way in hell that i would had preordered some korean tittie game. the fact that they cucked made me not buy that shit after all
 
IMG_3938.jpeg

 
I understand men oogling at women, but I find it pathetic to admit that as a man myself.
That's the result of decades of feminist propaganda. We got to the situation where people proudly talk about weird ass fetishes but saying they find adult women with big boobs sexy is seen as "creepy coomer". I can't even follow how we had a loli debate here on one of the few Asian games without that content.
 
I can't even follow how we had a loli debate here on one of the few Asian games without that content.
It's not even that. Most asian games don't have loli content. Screaming loli/pedo is just an easy way to get people to shut up, or to push them into trying to defend the indefensible, even though it has nothing to do with the argument at hand.

It used to be used against anime and anime style games because they browbeat ignorant normies into agreeing with them, but they overstretched long ago. Dragons Crown was more than a decade ago, and now we have this. A game featuring a real 31 year old woman, and people mad about boobs in games are crying pedo over it.
 
I find the game kind of whatever for being marketed for a sexy character (her head is distractingly small to me), but shit like the Last of Us 2 has a sex scene that serves no purpose to the plot and weird gross dyke shit.
We got to the situation where people proudly talk about weird ass fetishes but saying they find adult women with big boobs sexy is seen as "creepy coomer".
I have been thinking about that reality.

There is a push to normalize prostitution, also known as sex work in newspeak, and other extreme degeneracy.
And there is a constant push to remove sexy female characters from media.
There is a big overlap of people who support both these positions, all the way up to the big money movers.

Now, if I were conspiracy-minded, I would connect this to the Weimar Republic and say this is a deliberate push to increase prostitution.

I would argue that the only real effect sexy women in media have on society is that they pacify the hordes of lonely men.
The ugliness of media definitely doesn't increase modesty in real life, but it might increase the audience for OnlyFans-like content.
 
people mad about boobs in games are crying pedo over it.
If they had a concrete meaning to lolicon such as. Lolicon: The depiction of childlike characters in sexual situations. No one would be against banning it but they purposely keep it vague just so they can bash anime and have all of it fall under that category without realising that everyone else sees that it's purposely left vague and that because of how vague the definition, it can and will be abused by malicious actors later on.
 
I have been thinking about that reality.

There is a push to normalize prostitution, also known as sex work in newspeak, and other extreme degeneracy.
And there is a constant push to remove sexy female characters from media.
There is a big overlap of people who support both these positions, all the way up to the big money movers.

Now, if I were conspiracy-minded, I would connect this to the Weimar Republic and say this is a deliberate push to increase prostitution.

I would argue that the only real effect sexy women in media have on society is that they pacify the hordes of lonely men.
The ugliness of media definitely doesn't increase modesty in real life, but it might increase the audience for OnlyFans-like content.
The way these gamers have it, it's like everything under the sun is fine. But then they just draw this arbitrary line at pedophilia without realizing that it destroys their entire argument against censorship. You'd think that would inevitably lead them to think, "Hmm, maybe censorship is a good thing..."
Certain forms of 'art' should not see the light of day because they are blatant attempt to normalize unnatural or inhuman behaviors.
The "we got bear sex and nudity in BG3 but we can't have this?!" guy is probably the most cringe of the bunch and I think the reason he made 2 videos is because he must've realized how insane he was advocating for something on the back of virtual bear sex and scaly dragon penises. So he had to amend his first video to clarify it was about "muh censorship" because generalizing the argument as artistic freedom is a lot better than saying he just wants goon material.
 
Last edited:
I have been thinking about that reality.

There is a push to normalize prostitution, also known as sex work in newspeak, and other extreme degeneracy.
And there is a constant push to remove sexy female characters from media.
There is a big overlap of people who support both these positions, all the way up to the big money movers.

Now, if I were conspiracy-minded, I would connect this to the Weimar Republic and say this is a deliberate push to increase prostitution.

I would argue that the only real effect sexy women in media have on society is that they pacify the hordes of lonely men.
The ugliness of media definitely doesn't increase modesty in real life, but it might increase the audience for OnlyFans-like content.
It's all oppression theory. Male oriented heteronormativity is evil and needs to be expunged from media as well as the men need to be "educated" to accept disgusting women and faggots. Meanwhile female oriented sexuality is more shameless than women fanservice ever was, with men taking off clothes more than any previous parody.

The push for prostitution is more of a direct result of economic decline and social issues.
 
The way these gamers have it, it's like everything under the sun is fine. But then they just draw this arbitrary line at pedophilia without realizing that it destroys their entire argument against censorship. You'd think that would inevitably lead them to think, "Hmm, maybe censorship is a good thing..."
Certain forms of 'art' should not see the light of day because they are blatant attempt to normalize unnatural or inhuman behaviors.
The "we got bear sex and nudity in BG3 but we can't have this?!" guy is probably the most cringe of the bunch and I think the reason he made 2 videos is because he must've realized he was basically advocating for something on the back of virtual bear sex and scaly dragon penises. So he had to amend his first video to clarify it was about "muh censorship" because generalizing the argument as artistic freedom is a lot better than saying he just wants goon material.
It's always pathetic when people can't stand for their actual beliefs.
Saying 'I like looking at sexy women when playing video games' is literally all they have to say, but they try to make it about some higher purpose. It also often leads to really dumb arguments; just say you like boobs.

I like looking at beautiful women in video games, and unless there's a good narrative reason, every woman should be beautiful.
Who wants to look at ugly people if given the choice?

I do find the changes made to the skimpy outfits disgusting since all they are is a 'fuck you' to the players who bought the obvious coomer game for its skimpiness. On the other hand Sony drones deserve far worse.

The censorship of Hard to Crime might be incidentally funny, but the censorship is extremely disgusting.
That was only done because Niggers have become America's religion.


The push for prostitution is more of a direct result of economic decline and social issues.
That is an optimistic view I don't share. I don't believe that the trillions of dollars sunk into researching social engineering have no effect.
I know that the most proactive of the Western oligarchs actively want to destroy the West.
Oops, we printed another trillion dollars and funneled it to our overseas ventures.
Oh no, who could have foreseen that raising women's standards while decreasing men's options could lead to a large number of miserable singles?

There are millions of silly social theories, but somehow only the ones that are destructive to Western societies propagate.

The phrase 'the purpose of a system is what it does' comes to mind; and it is destroying the West.
 
Last edited:
It's always pathetic when people can't stand for their actual beliefs.
Saying 'I like looking at sexy women when playing video games' is literally all they have to say, but they try to make it about some higher purpose. It also often leads to really dumb arguments; just say you like boobs.

I like looking at beautiful women in video games, and unless there's a good narrative reason, every woman should be beautiful.
Who wants to look at ugly people if given the choice?

I do find the changes made to the skimpy outfits disgusting since all they are is a 'fuck you' to the players who bought the obvious coomer game for its skimpiness. On the other hand Sony drones deserve far worse.

The censorship of Hard to Crime might be incidentally funny, but it is extremely disgusting.
That was only done because Niggers have become America's religion.
Ironically, people censoring themselves from saying what they really want even as they talk about being against censorship.
Meanwhile, none of these guys would be caught dead saying "nigger"
 
The way these gamers have it, it's like everything under the sun is fine. But then they just draw this arbitrary line at pedophilia without realizing that it destroys their entire argument against censorship. You'd think that would inevitably lead them to think, "Hmm, maybe censorship is a good thing..."
Certain forms of 'art' should not see the light of day because they are blatant attempt to normalize unnatural or inhuman behaviors.
Except I don't buy that argument. People going on some moral high horse about why things should be censored only to turn out to be a creep themselves is an old cliche. Back in the 90s and 2000s it was family values conservatives being caught in gay bars, to the more recent trend of male feminist allies turning out to sex pests. Just look at how ResetEra condemns the game, while turning a blind eye to their Discord members talking about which first world countries have the lowest age of consent years ago, or how one of their most prolific members has a mail order bride (or an arranged marriage, I forget which).

I hate to use the term projection, but it really seems to be the case. Real world harm is real, whereas possible theoretical harm is at best unknown.

It's always pathetic when people can't stand for their actual beliefs.
Saying 'I like looking at sexy women when playing video games' is literally all they have to say, but they try to make it about some higher purpose. It also often leads to really dumb arguments; just say you like boobs.
Agreed. The problem you run into is kind of like the pedo argument. People will just scream at you to look at porn on the internet and get it out of gaming, but that isn't the point.
 
People going on some moral high horse about why things should be censored only to turn out to be a creep themselves is an old cliche.
That's not the argument. What I'm saying is, let's say Stellar Blade had actual child pornography in it and Shift Up was insisting they did this for "artistic reasons."
Anyone with a modicum of sanity would want that stuff removed from the game. That would be still be censorship. But nobody (in their right mind) would have a problem with it.
See what I'm saying here? Censorship is not always a bad thing.

whereas possible theoretical harm is at best unknown.
Brain scans on people with pornography addictions show the brain rewires itself when subjected to visual stimuli. While I don't believe pornography or watching violence causes people to do harm, I do believe it has the propensity to turn people into sociopaths. Meaning you can become numb to certain stimuli because your endorphins are fried.
 
Imagine wanting this deranged AWFL to have legal power over your progeny, and worse, sharing DNA with the insane.
This is the male version of Pantsu hitching with Ralph.
That is why you use protection, I don't want her getting pregnant also Im not cut out to be a father. On reflection it would not be worth it. She would turn a consensual encounter into a false rape accursation. The feds need to have a word with her. Kick needs to get their shit together.
 
Back