Some of those chatters are not anonymous and he often bans them on stream. DuncanCantDie for example is a way bigger streamer/influencer than President Sunday. The easiest way to prove your point would be to show cases where someone calls somebody a pedophile on the Internet without any specifics to that "accusation". Spoiler, they don't exist.
You have to ask yourself the two Questions:
1) What is the harm
2) what is the relief sought
I don't really know anything about what would actually count as slander, but pretending that what tiny is recently doing to some random person on the internet a pedo is kind of silly. Lets check the vod:
2) Before reacting to Turkey Tom’s video about him (him being Destiny) Destiny says he was “sexually harassed” by Donut Operator, and he was creepy towards children
View attachment 6218927
View attachment 6218930
- Tiny intentionally called donut a pedo: As this stage, i agree it stills fits on your interpretation of it not being an insult to take at face value.
- Tiny then expands to say that donut "had really weird statements about children" and "creepy jokes about children": Right now it is not calling him a pedo (slang), it is saying that he is openly a pedophile.
- To sign off, tiny adds "that's how i remember it, my friend will attest to that too", which is what, in my mind, really shows that tiny's intention is to slander donut.
So, all in all, Tiny is (1) is directly calling donut a pedophile, without doubt of it being the colloquial use of the word, (2) , he knows that it is a completely false statement (dans recounting of the event, the fact that tiny only started saying that AFTER donut joked about him), and, more importantly, (3) he knows that what he is saying is slanderous, and tries to qualify the insults in a way that he can fall back to unprovable things from their encounter (with emphasis by me): "i
THOUGHT that's what happened", "that's how
I REMEMBER it", and "
my friend will attest to that" (said friend was never confirmed to be TT, so it could be anyone else).
All that to say that even tiny is aware of how slanderous the statements are. So even if tiny thinks its a possible lawsuit, why do you feel so compelled to pretend there is no way he could be dragged into a lawsuit? Not saying that he will be, but it is already out of his hand, if donut wants to push some charges it would not be crazy. Even I can see through his meth fuelled 3d chess he is playing against his own schizophrenic head, and i am literally a retard posting analysis of other retards retarded actions, so imagine how someone more capable and with a motive could easily justify a case for slander.