Stinkditch Meta Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
(...) and Null has said before that boards for audiences, not categorization. I have two critiques on why I think that the location and the board name is incorrect:
The troon troops on Twitter have made it clear they're going after women's spaces (Mumsnet specifically, likely due to the fact that it's by and for women and hosts a trans widow thread) and GC spaces next, and they probably have fewer resources which might not be as developed and thought through and less obstinance than Josh when it comes to not being censored, so imho Beauty Parlor, which is where women congregate and where Null mentioned wanting to place the board, is a perfect location not only because it's funny that it makes them seethe but also because women who are losing spaces, afraid of losing them, or waking up to the menace of troons is a specific and distinct audience than those who just like to laugh at retards.

Either way, I appreciate the thought of having this zone for that group of people and the opportunity for more of them to discover and contribute to the farms.
 
The Bobposting and Esqueer threads should be brought over.

I'm torn over whether breadtubers like Contrapoints and Philosophy Tube belong here. They're both troons who prominently advocate for trannies, but they also could stay under Internet Famous.
I am voting against Contrapoints and Philosophy Tube. I think my metric would be, "If they weren't transgender, would they still be a lolcow?" Both parties did lolcow shit before trooning out (especially Philosophy Tube), so definitely yes.

I am also voting, ironically, against any sort of community voting/polls on if a cow should go into this board. People will say yes regardless of fit just because they hate trannies. And then the thread is going to turn from whatever it was, to screeching 75% about how the cow is a troon.
 
Should we bring the Fat Tony thread out of Lolcow General? It could probably be renamed to Minor British Troons and used to keep coralled a few of the loudmouths who aren't funny enough for a thread of their own, but appear regularly enough that all their misdeeds ought to be gathered together for anyone looking, rather than scattered through the general troon threads.

 
Would it make sense to demote the Rat Kings board to a subsection on this board? At least a few cows have been moved to this board already, but apparently fully merging the boards has already been rejected. There will be substantial overlap in posters between the two boards and having all the cows under one roof seems more convenient.
 
I am genuinely delighted that the direct outcome of the Keffals spergwar is the establishment by the Final Boss of the Internet of the new TERF compound.

This will provide an excellent one stop shop for information on prominent AGPs, child groomers, speech censors, sex offenders, violent misogynists and the rest of those who make up the “trans right activist” grouping.

And they‘re here forever.
 
I am voting against Contrapoints and Philosophy Tube. I think my metric would be, "If they weren't transgender, would they still be a lolcow?" Both parties did lolcow shit before trooning out (especially Philosophy Tube), so definitely yes.

I am also voting, ironically, against any sort of community voting/polls on if a cow should go into this board. People will say yes regardless of fit just because they hate trannies. And then the thread is going to turn from whatever it was, to screeching 75% about how the cow is a troon.

I think contrapoints because of the level of influence they have over university stuff in the US

speaking of university troons, the Ortberg/Lavery thread belongs here
 
I am voting against Contrapoints and Philosophy Tube. I think my metric would be, "If they weren't transgender, would they still be a lolcow?" Both parties did lolcow shit before trooning out (especially Philosophy Tube), so definitely yes.
Agreed, in the prior thread and elsewhere I advocated for something like a simple metric of "is this person popular because of troonery? is their content almost entirely troonery-based?" Contra and Tube are decent examples of someone who has headed in that direction but probably is not the original reason they got a thread. I think there may be reason to later on move someone here if that becomes everything about them. Those two examples at least seem to produce other content still.

Troon Lawyer or Tony/Erin Reed is a good example of the converse, it's entirely their troonery and stuff like involvement with Keffals that got them noticed and led to them getting threads. Also if you look at their Twitter this is basically all they actually ever talk about or the root of all they talk about. Often even when they talk about other topics they eventually make it all about troonery. (Tony's politics are, for example, almost entirely nothing but whether he thinks someone supports troons or not.)
 
Back