StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

pride-month-tomb-stonetoss-comic.png

Deadly Sin (S / A)
Happy pride month.
Pride comes before the fall.
 
Even when Stonetoss's hot takes are wrong and edgelordery he still never fails to make me laugh my ass off, even if he's attacking my own opinion. IMO only other comic strip as consistently funny was Perry Bible Fellowship. Both don't treat their audiences like they're retards (Ben Garrison thinks his audience is as smart as he is, which is, not very).

The most I can think of is that Invader Zim was also widely popular "wacky" show, but barely to the degree Rick and Morty did, and its fans where mostly fat girls rather than 30 year old redditors.
Hah, bullseye. Every Invader Zim freak I've met (and that's been a loooong time, the show is quickly being forgotten) was a chubby girl. There are worse shows to be fans over. Better than being a weeb.
 
View attachment 5152090
Apple of my Eye (S / A)
Golden (priced) apples.
Nobody loves conspicuous consumption like progressives.
I decided to check out the price of the Apple AR headset, and it cost a whopping 3.5k. That's a lot! But then I checked the price of M$ Hololens 2, and... it costs exactly the same. So I honestly don't see the issue, Apple's products are usually overpriced, but this one seems to be priced competitively.
Also,
1686076226100.png
 
Even when Stonetoss's hot takes are wrong and edgelordery he still never fails to make me laugh my ass off, even if he's attacking my own opinion.
Another consistently high quality "alt-right cartoonist is Wormwood. It's often less overtly political and more surreal, but when it is political it's the sort of edgelordery you get from ST too, so it's fairly often racist, "transphobic," etc. Also has a simple yet distinct style like ST and a solid grasp of how to use panels.

It's cringy how few left wing web cartoonists seem to understand panels at all and fill their shit with words to the point they look like the shit R. Crumb's brother did while he was losing his mind.
 
Even when Stonetoss's hot takes are wrong and edgelordery he still never fails to make me laugh my ass off, even if he's attacking my own opinion.
I think I agree with him on almost everything. I don't get how the alt right is edgy when lefties are literally larping as Satan worshipers. Maybe this was the case in 2015 or 2016, but now people mean it when they say nigger or other colorful words and phrases.
 
Even when Stonetoss's hot takes are wrong and edgelordery he still never fails to make me laugh my ass off, even if he's attacking my own opinion.
You know what's the funniest aspect of that? He's just competent in what he does, not some art-prodigy. He did not create a museum-worthy masterpiece, didn't redefine modern art or something. He just knows how to make his 4-pannelers work, he plays to the strong points of visual media. I can't comprehend how so many people fail to understand those basic things. It's not something new either. Commies from hundred years ago knew that(one can argue they've invented 4-pannelers). Or, for other example, Brittish inteligence basically invented modern propaganda through two world wars, and information about that is not classified. One can learn that. In modern days it is a few clicks away. There are pictures of visual media, and there are books about the history of propaganda. Or, if you don't like the word "propaganda", there are a tonns of literature and full univercity cources on how to design ads, which is fundamentally the same. Yet these people willingly choose to work off pure vibes, it seems, and then say how stonetoss is bad in their one page comics with a highschool assignment worth of text. I just can not comprehend.
A man learns. A wokie vibes.
Безымянный2.png

A man learns! A wokie vibes!
Some time ago I've used to despise these guys who tried to just copy toss's style as the absolute lowest, but now I don't think so. So far they did a piss-poor job, but by adopting an efficient art form and putting themselves in its boundaries they have a chance to actually learn something one day.
 
You know what's the funniest aspect of that? He's just competent in what he does, not some art-prodigy. He did not create a museum-worthy masterpiece, didn't redefine modern art or something. He just knows how to make his 4-pannelers work, he plays to the strong points of visual media. I can't comprehend how so many people fail to understand those basic things. It's not something new either. Commies from hundred years ago knew that(one can argue they've invented 4-pannelers). Or, for other example, Brittish inteligence basically invented modern propaganda through two world wars, and information about that is not classified. One can learn that. In modern days it is a few clicks away. There are pictures of visual media, and there are books about the history of propaganda. Or, if you don't like the word "propaganda", there are a tonns of literature and full univercity cources on how to design ads, which is fundamentally the same. Yet these people willingly choose to work off pure vibes, it seems, and then say how stonetoss is bad in their one page comics with a highschool assignment worth of text. I just can not comprehend.
A man learns. A wokie vibes.
View attachment 5156201
A man learns! A wokie vibes!
Some time ago I've used to despise these guys who tried to just copy toss's style as the absolute lowest, but now I don't think so. So far they did a piss-poor job, but by adopting an efficient art form and putting themselves in its boundaries they have a chance to actually learn something one day.
There are actually good communist political cartoons from 100 years ago, what we call memes and webcomics today. Although theyre not agreeable and stupid at times they communicate well. Its just the current crop of communists are complete asshats, illiterate retards and just plain unartistic. Check out https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/red-cartoons/1929/index.htm.

1686320220947.png

1686320262604.png

1686320347013.png

1686320453325.png

Even if I dont like this shit, it is a lot better than fucking breadpanes and birdwug. Also has little to no text unlike modern commie comics.
 
There are actually good communist political cartoons from 100 years ago, what we call memes and webcomics today.
I know. I live there. That's why I chose it as an example. Here's another one, by the way, somewhat reminicent you can say:
Plakat_mayakowski_gross.jpg

If you cope enough, you can even see a tiny black amogus in that skeletons hip bone.
Not many words, and that comic can be understood even without them. It was specifically done that way, so even illiterate pesants from bumfuck nowhere hear the chinese border could get a solid grasp of what was stated. But if someone is literate, this shit also rhymes and not easy to get out of your head.
But even commies aside, caricature was a thing before them. It can be studied, and it isn't hard. They've already learned how to draw(more or less), which is a more complicated matter. But they choose not to.

Sometimes I start to believe that all this woke shit, an ideological dead-end, was invented by a think-tank. Like, they wanted to make gangsta-rap for white people, but way more stupid. They are trained wrong intentionally.
 
I know. I live there. That's why I chose it as an example. Here's another one, by the way, somewhat reminicent you can say:
That Russian stuff looks like street signs, the ones I put were from America, the daily worker to be particular. More importantly I blame cultural Marxism for producing shit art and teaching commies how not to draw cause any identifiable categorical feature given to the drawing denominates a physical difference and becomes a vector of oppression. Lenin there looks like Lenin, but if a modern commie drew him he would be a bean headed troon.
 
You know what's the funniest aspect of that? He's just competent in what he does, not some art-prodigy. He did not create a museum-worthy masterpiece, didn't redefine modern art or something. He just knows how to make his 4-pannelers work, he plays to the strong points of visual media. I can't comprehend how so many people fail to understand those basic things. It's not something new either. Commies from hundred years ago knew that(one can argue they've invented 4-pannelers). Or, for other example, Brittish inteligence basically invented modern propaganda through two world wars, and information about that is not classified. One can learn that. In modern days it is a few clicks away. There are pictures of visual media, and there are books about the history of propaganda. Or, if you don't like the word "propaganda", there are a tonns of literature and full univercity cources on how to design ads, which is fundamentally the same. Yet these people willingly choose to work off pure vibes, it seems, and then say how stonetoss is bad in their one page comics with a highschool assignment worth of text. I just can not comprehend.
A man learns. A wokie vibes.
View attachment 5156201
A man learns! A wokie vibes!
Some time ago I've used to despise these guys who tried to just copy toss's style as the absolute lowest, but now I don't think so. So far they did a piss-poor job, but by adopting an efficient art form and putting themselves in its boundaries they have a chance to actually learn something one day.
When the competition in the "comic with an axe to grind" space is something like, say, Assigned Male, Boulderhurl looks MENSA level by comparison.
 
When the competition in the "comic with an axe to grind" space is something like, say, Assigned Male, Boulderhurl looks MENSA level by comparison.
I like the ones where he takes a break from the axe grinding and just does something funny, mostly because the REEEEE REEEEEE NOTSEE crowd are completely confused and wonder how he is dog whistling for TND.
 
Back