He didn't even mention the original xbone required the kinect as part of the console, which added another 100+ to the pricetag. The kinect would also be used to count how many people were watching a movie/game to enforce private use of media only. People asking if the kinect was optional was told the xbone was built around the kinect and it couldn't be removed. Of course, once market research came in kinect was gone.
I remember something similar. It was meant to allow you to share discs with others, even when games are all linked to your gamertag. Seeing how now all games are digital only and linked to your gametag with zero methods to share, they were actually generous with that alternative.
SKG just wants to piggyback on the form, not support any other points on that list. It is a bit iffy since it seems that adding things to it implies implicit support of the already existing points, but Ross just wants this to happen.
I gaurentee you it's being astroturfed to hell with the usual suspects.
No, the whole point was that there was not going to be any sharing of used discs and definitely no sharing of digital titles. PS4 included backwards compatibility and no DRM for discs and so they blew Microsoft out of the water.
God... when are we Euroniggers going to have to stop carrying everything on our backs
Until the Americans stop choking down 10 litres of coke, shove down fake cheese their throat and watch nigger TV +8 hours per day. We still have to direct their consoomer habits from killing them.
| 1 Litre | 0.264 Gallon |
| Fake cheese | Mcdonald's cheeseburger yellow square thing. |
| 8 hours | 8 Netflix episodes. |
The issues at hand have little to do with individual consumption habits and more to do with judicial precedent set in the 90's and a strong corporate lobbying industry.
Microsoft pushed super hard in 2013. Luckily gamers gave a no so hard that it tanked the brand to no hopes of reaching 2009ish levels of popularity.
I have coworkers that are turbo consumers manifest and are unironically against anything that prevents a company from raping consumers on a daily basis because stopping companies from doing that would "reduce freedom".
There's no reason not to pursue all possible avenues. They're not going to reopen the Digital Fairness Act for further commentary by gamers if SKG simply gets a "no" from the European parliament.
